no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Mary Eunice (Crume) Birkhead (1756 - 1817)

Mary Eunice [uncertain] Birkhead formerly Crume
Born in Bull Creek, Frederick, Virginia, Colony of Virginiamap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 15 Mar 1776 in Shenandoah, Colony of Virginiamap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 61 in Washington County, Kentucky, USAmap
Profile last modified | Created 1 Sep 2014
This page has been accessed 302 times.

I researched the same resourse below that you used and it clearly says that "Mary's" last name was Crumy and NOT Crume. I will therefore, suggest the merge of Crume -94 with Crume-32 as the same person. Henderson-4056

Biography

Mary married Samuel Horsely on 16 Jan 1798 in Nelson, Kentucky.[1]


Sources

  1. "Kentucky, County Marriages, 1797-1954," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:V5ZD-P7W : accessed 1 October 2016), Saml Horsely and Mary Crumy, 16 Jan 1798; citing Nelson, Kentucky, United States, Madison County Courthouse, Richmond; FHL microfilm 9,669.




Is Mary your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Mary by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Mary:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 4

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Crume-148 and Crume-32 appear to represent the same person because: There is overlap in birth and death dates, although one entry includes a middle name and the other shows married name and children. 99.9% certain this is a duplicate.
posted by Vicki Beyer
Caution: Unusual information. Is the following correct?

A birth date (Crume-32 born 15 Mar 1756) is more than 40 years before or after a sibling's birth date (Crume-29 born 17 Jul 1798) .

posted by Richard Balsley Jr.
Unusual, yes. But not impossible. Look at the father’s profile. He was married twice, with the second marriage nearly 40 years after the first. Of course the children of the second marriage were born decades after their older half-siblings.
posted by Vicki Beyer
Crume-94 and Crume-32 appear to represent the same person because: identical parents and birth (merges proposed) death is not sourced on either profile
posted by Robin Lee

C  >  Crume  |  B  >  Birkhead  >  Mary Eunice (Crume) Birkhead