no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Sarah (Unknown) Woodcock (bef. 1630 - 1676)

Sarah Woodcock formerly [surname unknown]
Born before in Englandmap [uncertain]
Daughter of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married before 1649 [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died after age 46 in Rehoboth, Bristol, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap
Profile last modified | Created 1 Mar 2011
This page has been accessed 470 times.
The Birth Date is a rough estimate. See the text for details.
The Puritan Great Migration.
Sarah (Unknown) Woodcock migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640).
Join: Puritan Great Migration Project
Discuss: pgm

Contents

Disputed Origins

Some, without source, identify her as the daughter of William Curtis who was baptized at Nazeing on 5 August 1627. Anderson concludes of that daughter that she may be the "Mary" named when William was admitted to Roxbury Church and that there is "no further record" of her.[1] The identification of John Woodcock's wife as a Curtis appears to be speculative and her origins are currently unknown.

Biography

Sarah (___) was probably born in England before 1630, based on the likely date of her marriage.

Sarah married John Woodcock before 1649.[2]

Sarah Woodcock is mentioned in a couple deeds in Plymouth Colony. "Sara" signed with her mark in a land transaction from John Woodcock to Joseph Carpenter, dated January 1, 1660(/1),[3] and John, "with the consent of my beloved wife Sarah Woodcock" sold land to Peter Hunt Jr. on June 17, 1673.[4]

Sarah, the wife of John Woodcocke, died May 10, 1676 at Rehoboth.[5]

Children

Children of Thomas Woodcock and Sarah (___) include:[2]

  1. John, b. 1649
  2. Israel (~1652-~1718)
  3. Jonathan (~1668-)
  4. Thomas
  5. [Sarah] (1667-), m. Thomas Estabrook
  6. Mary (->1697)
  7. Deborah
  8. Nathaniel

Research Notes

Sarah in Secondary Sources

In the Dedham Historical Register (1890), Sarah (Unknown) is mentioned as the wife of John Woodcock, and dying at Attleboro November 29, 1676.[6]The Genealogical And Family History of Maine (1909) writes that "About 1649 [John Woodcock] married Sarah, the mother of his children. She died in 1676 at Attleboro".[7] Similiarly, in History of the Woodcock Family (1912), Woodcock says that John's "wife and the mother of his children was named Sarah and died at Attleboro in the year 1676",[8] and in A Sketch of the History of Attleborough (1834), Daggett says that Sarah was his first wife and died May 1676.[9]

Sumner in Descendants of Thomas Farr of Harpswell, Maine, and Ninety Allied Families (1959) gives her name as "Sarah (Curtis?)" without providing a source, and gives her death as May 10, 1676 at Attleboro.[2]

Sources

  1. Robert Charles Anderson, The Great Migration Begins: Immigrants to New England 1620-1633, 3 vols. (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1995), 1:500; image, American Ancestors, (https://www.americanancestors.org/DB393/i/12107/500/23894859 : accessed 28 Jan 2022) [$ubscription required].
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Edith Sumner, Descendants of Thomas Farr of Harpswell, Maine, and Ninety Allied Families, (American Offset Printers, Los Angeles, Calif., 1959), 322.
  3. Plymouth Colony Deeds, vol. 3, pt. 1, p. 5
  4. Plymouth Colony Deeds, vol. 4, pt. 1, p. 153
  5. Arnold, James. Vital Record of Rehoboth, 1642-1896 (Narragansett Historical Pub. Co., 1897), p. 900
  6. The Dedham Historical Register (The Dedham Historical Society, Dedham, Mass., 1890-), vol. 4, p. 174-175
  7. Little, George Thomas. Genealogical and Family History of the State of Maine (Lewis Historical Pub. Co., New York, 1909), p. 1335
  8. Woodcock, William. History of the Woodcock Family (Altoona, Penn'a, 1912), p. 57
  9. Daggett, John. A Sketch of the History of Attleborough (H. Mann, Dedham, 1834), p. 35
  • Plymouth Colony Records, Deeds. Digital Images. FamilySearch, DGS film 007451133 ("Deeds, vols. 2-4, 1651-1681.")
See Also:
  • FamilySearch Profile for "Sarah Curtis" LCTG-GDK




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Sarah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Sarah:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 10

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
It's been almost two years since the start of the G2G discussion concerning her disputed origins and there still does not appear to be any source connecting Sarah, the wife of John Woodcock to the Sarah, daughter of William Curtis, who was baptized at Nazeing on 5 August 1627. Anderson concludes of that daughter that she may be the "Mary" named when William was admitted to Roxbury Church and that there is "no further record" of her (see GMB 1:500). It appears that the identification of John Woodcock's wife as a Curtis is speculative. Unless anyone is aware of a source to support this connection, I propose that this Sarah's parents be detached and her LNAB be changed to Unknown.
posted on Curtis-630 (merged) by Scott McClain
edited by Scott McClain
I agree Scott. The Woodcock wife should be Sarah _____
posted on Curtis-630 (merged) by Anne B
I reformatted this page (I fixed, but didn't remove anything that was there), and added the sources I posted on the G2G discussion. I haven't looked into her children - Samuel (attached on WikiTree) isn't mentioned in the secondary sources, and the two Israels need to be merged.

I left the origin section to point to the G2G discussion for now, even though nothing seems to have been concluded, and the discussion seems dead. Should her LNAB be changed to unknown, and disconnected from her parents (and of course explained in the biography)?

I'm also wondering if the profile should be PGM, or PGM adjacent, as there is no clear evidence of when she emigrated, and is first mentioned by name in 1660/1 (supposedly was married by 1649)?

posted on Curtis-630 (merged) by Thomas B
I guess the easiest thing to do would be disconnect from parents and change her name to Unknown. Or create a new Sarah Unknown to be the wife of Woodcock and change both profiles and move the children.
posted on Curtis-630 (merged) by Anne B
Lydia, you're a manager, what do you think.
posted on Curtis-630 (merged) by Anne B
Is there any source for Sarah being the daughter of William Curtis? I see it claimed everywhere when searching by google, but there are never any sources attached. The linked sources only give her name as Sarah, the wife of John Woodcock. There is no mention in Anderson's William Curtis biography of a daughter Sarah (apart from the Sarah baptism record possibly mistaken for Mary).

From what I can see there is no marriage record and her name is only mentioned in her death record?

posted on Curtis-630 (merged) by Thomas B
edited by Thomas B
Replied on G2G
posted on Curtis-630 (merged) by Anne B
Preliminary research . Anderson and the Curtis Society: Sarah Curtis bp Nazeing 5 Aug 1627; as there is no burial for a Sarah in Nazing and no room in the sequence of births for another child, this daughter is very likely the same as the Mary named by Eliot at the admission of her father to the Roxbury Church---No further record.
posted on Curtis-630 (merged) by Anne B
Curtis-4389 and Curtis-630 appear to represent the same person because: Same husband and child. Problem with dates.
posted on Curtis-630 (merged) by Rick Pierpont
This profile has been identified as a duplicate by Phil Smith, an Arborist. Please review the proposed merge - bottom of the profile on the left. If they are duplicates please approve the merge. If you have questions or would like assistance please ask. If the second profile is an orphan, you can complete the merge yourself. Thank you.
posted on Curtis-630 (merged) by Philip Smith

[Do you know Sarah's family name?]  |  W  >  Woodcock  >  Sarah (Unknown) Woodcock

Categories: Estimated Birth Date | Puritan Great Migration