no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Joseph Daggett (1668 - 1718)

Joseph Daggett
Born in Tisbury, Dukes, Massachusetts Bay, British Colonial Americamap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 1685 in Martha's Vineyard, West Tisbury, Dukes, New York Colonymap
Husband of — married 1693 in Tisbury, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 50 in Tisbury, Martha's Vineyard, Dukes County, Province of Massachusettsmap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Jeffrey Wall private message [send private message] and Colleen Griffin private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 29 May 2011
This page has been accessed 1,995 times.

Contents

Biography

Research Notes

The lineage and biography of this profile for Joseph Daggett has been adjusted to reflect the currently accepted NEHGS 2007 updated research. This source seeks to correct the many errors found in prior sources and is best considered as the main source until such time that new records are discovered. [1]

___________________________________________________________________________________

Joseph Daggett, son of Joseph, was born in Tisbury, Massachusetts.[2]

He married Amy Mantor about 1693.[2]

Joseph died about 1718 in Edgartown, Massachusetts.[2]

Joseph was born in 1668 in Tisbury MA and presumably followed the trade of his father. He married AMY EDDY abt. 1685. daughter of John and Hepzibah (Daggett) Eddy of Tisbury who was b. abt. 1668 and prob. predeceased her husband. She was living 17 Nov. 1712 (Deeds ii.349) but was not mentioned in John Eddy's will of 1714, either because he had provided for her or she was dead. The will of Joseph Daggett dated 17 Oct. 1704, was not proven until 12 Aug. 1718, the same year that his father's estate was administered. It would seem that the son's death necessitated the settlement of his father's large real estate interests. Children: (daughter? b. abt. 1686) } (daughter? b. abt. 1689) }"other children"' named in will as having received their "portions", prob. at marriage but nothing is known of them or their husbands. ELIZABETH,4 b. 1692; m. JOHN MARCHANT (13). AMY, b. Mch. 1694; m. THOMAS MARTAIN (10) 26 Dec. 1715. JOHN, b. (1696). TEMPERANCE, b. 1700; m. SAMUEL HUXFORD (10). JOSEPH, b. 1704. HEPZIBAH, b. (1706) ; m. ENOCH NORTON (412) 17 Dec. 1725. [3]

THE DAGGETT FAMILY

Patrilineal descent was incredibly important for both Wampanoags and English colonists. Among New England Algonquians, although some land could be transferred through the female line (matrilineal descent), paternal ties were "far more crucial." For example, sachems usually inherited their office through the paternal line, and the office usually went to a male relative (Plane 21). Even women who inherited the position of squa-sachem did so through their fathers or other male relatives. Patrilineal descent was also crucial for colonists: women took their husband's name upon marriage and in the case of a husband's death, the claims of wives to property were subordinate to that of their children. The power of the father was felt in both religious and political spheres: the "family reproduced patriarchal relations of power in which the obedience of wives, daughters, and children, was thought to be religiously proscribed" (O'Brien 23; Ditz 26). Moreover, since only male Puritans could be ministers, the religious legacy of the "missionary Mayhews" was passed along only through male descendents (left). Wills from Martha's Vineyard reveal although both sons and daughters might inherit something, what they inherited was often unequal. Moreover, only children of legitimate marriages tended to inherit property (and status) from their fathers.

For Wampanoags, kinship was an important means of cementing political alliances. Sachems regularly ensured support for their regimes by distributing favors and political power to family members, and the often sought marriages for their children that would help ensure military support during times of trouble. Although polygamy and divorce were both acceptable in Wampanoag society, it appears that in order to inherit the position of the sachem, an individual had to be descended from a royal family both on his mother and father's side (Plane 21-23, 50-51).

One of the most interesting examples of a convergence of all of these issues is the Daggett Family (below). The lineage of the Daggett family has been a source of contention, and Catherine Merwin Mayhew (Genealogist of the Martha's Vineyard Historical Society) and Andrew Pierce (author of The Wampanoag Genealogical History of Martha's Vineyard), provide some useful corrections to the information provided in Banks' History of Martha's Vineyard. I have summarized these below in the Kinship Chart for the Sachem of Sanchacantacket and Daggett Family (L. Leibman, 2008). Joseph Daggett (1647-1718) was a white colonist who married at least two times, once to a daughter of the Wampanoag sachem Autumsquin, and once to a white woman, possibly named Amy Eddy (ca. 1668- 1712/14). Joseph Daggett had three children: Hester and Alice ("Ellis") Daggett by his Wampanoag wife, and then a son by his white wife, Joseph Daggett, Jr. (1704-?) as well as several female children, including Elizabeth, Amy, and Temperance, who are mentioned in Joseph's will. Hester (1672-1708?) went on to marry a white colonist named Edward Cottle (1666-1751?), with whom she had at least one daughter who herself married several colonists in succession. In contrast, Alice (ca. 1675-1711) never married, though she had three illegitimate children by three different white colonists. Alice Daggett was taken to court on fornication charges for each of these births, and in response filed suits against the fathers for financial support. As a result, her children each take the names of their fathers, rather than their mother's name: Black Henry Luce (son of "White-eyed Henry Luce"), Samuel Look (son of Samuel Look), and Patience Allen. The wills of Joseph Daggett, Alice (Ellis) Daggett, and Edward Cottle are in the archive and can be usefully compared to see which child inherits what goods and property. He is the son of Joseph Daggett.

Sources

  1. Pierce, R. Andrew. "Joseph Daggett of Martha's Vineyard, His Native American Wife, and Their Descendants." The New England Historical and Genealogical Register Jan. 2007:5-21
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Samuel Bradlee Doggett - A history of the Doggett-Daggett family Boston. 1894. Page 84, 93. An Archive.org book.
  3. The History of Martha's Vineyard by Dr. Charles Banks: Volume III Family Genealogies: pp. 126 - 145

See also:

Acknowledgements

  • This person was created on 14 April 2010 through the import of Jamie 2010_2010-04-10.ged.
  • Daggett-471 was created by David Sylvester through the import of DaggettEddy.ged on Nov 17, 2014.




Is Joseph your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Joseph by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Joseph:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 7

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Doggett-7 and Daggett-159 do not represent the same person because: Compare the notes on Doggett 7 with Daggett 159. There are too many conflicting statements. I believe Daggett 159 is actually the son of Doggett 7.
posted by Wiley Walters Jr
Wiley, I emailed you a PDF of the NEHGS article that explains why these two were not father and son, but the same man.
posted by Jillaine Smith
Daggett-159 and Doggett-7 appear to represent the same person because: New research has shown that Banks was incorrect in his assumption that Joseph had a son Joseph born early enough to have married Amy Unknown, not Eddy. The new research as published by NEHGS shows Joseph (Doggett-7) married twice, once to an unknown Indian woman with whom he had two children, and once to an Amy Unknown with whom he had several more children.
posted by Jeffrey Wall
Doggett-7 and Daggett-159 do not represent the same person because: Too many conflicting dates and spouses; also, a 21 year different in birth year. The PMs need to sort this out.
posted by Jo Gill
Doggett-7 and Daggett-159 appear to represent the same person because: Research published in NEHGR in 2007 concluded these were the same man, not father and son.
posted by Jillaine Smith
Retain data fields from the older Joseph.
posted by Jillaine Smith
This profile needs to be updated to reflect research published in NEHGR in 2007 (subscription required), which concluded that there was no son Joseph b 1668 [but there was a later one born 1704]; that the Joseph Doggett who married Amy was the person currently represented by THIS Joseph's father-- i.e., Joseph Doggett [Sr] had two wives: 1) A Native American; 2) Amy _______ (last name at birth not known).

The two "Amy's" (wives) here need to be merged, and LNAB changed to Unknown.

posted by Jillaine Smith
edited by Jillaine Smith

D  >  Daggett  >  Joseph Daggett