Sexton's Records, 1733-1927, of Goshen Cemetery in Lebanon, Connecticut (Connecticut State Library) Page 16
Mayflower Families Through Five Generations Volume 13 2006 p. 46
Kemp, Lisa Farrand Title: The Farrand Families of Missouri and Illinois
Tuttle-Tuthill Lines in America, Second Publisher: Higginson Book Company, Second Address: Salem, Massachusetts (Estel Printing Service, Columbus, Ohio, 1968)
Is Elizabeth your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Dwelly-5 and Owen-5959 have been in an "unmerged match" state with no explanation for almost three years. They are probably for the same person. I am changing it from unmerged match state to pending merge state for reexamination. Please merge or explain what the hold up is. Possible problems: Why is one of the profiles using the name "Owen"? And the husbands are both Joseph White, but their details are different.
Let me begin by apologizing for the delay, I suspect that if I saw this 3 years ago I saw the mess and decided it needed a bit of research to figure out the problems. Clearly it seems we have two different Joseph Whites, as they have very different data, and the name isn’t that uncommon. It is almost certain these two men did not marry the same woman at the same time, but likely both married a woman named Elizabeth. The similarity in data for Elizabeth is certainly due to people finding data for Elizabeth White, both of their married names, and assigning it ‘their’ Elizabeth, perhaps due to a confusion between the two same named husbands.
What really needs to be done is review the data that is actually know for the two women and make their entries look more distinct.
Dwelly-5 and Dwelly-10 appear to represent the same person because: It looks like I didn't notice a duplicate when I imported. These two people have the same husband.
What really needs to be done is review the data that is actually know for the two women and make their entries look more distinct.