James Farmer
Privacy Level: Open (White)

James Farmer (1742 - 1809)

James Farmer
Born in Henrico County, Virginiamap
Ancestors ancestors
[spouse(s) unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 67 in Pittsylvania County, Virginia, United Statesmap
Profile last modified | Created 9 Dec 2014
This page has been accessed 785 times.

Biography

Daughters of the American Revolution
James Farmer is a DAR Patriot Ancestor, A038675.
1776 Project
James Farmer performed Patriotic Service in Virginia in the American Revolution.

James Farmer was born about 1742 in Henrico County, Virginia, the son of Lodowick Farmer and Sarah Cheatham, and died before 21 August 1809 in Pittsylvania County, Virginia. He married at least twice; his second wife was Elizabeth "Betsy" Hubbard. Their son Newton, born c1790, married Sarah Ham.[1]

Sources

  1. DAR record for descendant of Patriot Ancestor James Farmer:
    • Daughters of the American Revolution, DAR Genealogical Research Databases, database online, (http://www.dar.org/ : accessed 29 September 2018), "Record of James Farmer", Ancestor # A038675.
  • Find A Grave: Memorial #74239915 page for James Farmer (1742–1809), accessed 26 April 2021; Maintained by WildGeese15 (contributor 47026950) Unknown, who reports an Unknown burial location.
  • Farmer, Ellery, Descendants of Thomas Farmer, compiled in 1956 and available online at https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?q1=Jeremiah%20farmer;id=wu.89065905861;view=image;start=1;sz=10;page=root;size=100;seq=19;num=13 or at https://dcms.lds.org/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?from=fhd&dps_pid=IE4221229
  • Internet posting lists sources and children of Lodowick Farmer, https://www.genealogy.com/forum/surnames/topics/farmer/5496/




  • Is James your ancestor? Please don't go away!
     star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
     star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
     star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
    Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

    DNA Connections
    It may be possible to confirm family relationships with James by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with James:

    Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



    Comments: 16

    Leave a message for others who see this profile.
    There are no comments yet.
    Login to post a comment.
    Farmer-3324 and Farmer-2033 appear to represent the same person because: they share a similar birth year, the same mother and many of the same siblings.
    posted by Linda (Johnson) Leslie
    I have approved this merger again.
    posted by Gary Taylor
    Farmer-2901 and Farmer-2033 appear to represent the same person because: Farmer-2901 and Farmer-2033 appear to represent the same person because: they have the same name. And that's about all there is. The only other item available is the death date, but that is uncertain! The misreading of the death date may have come from a misunderstanding of the DAR file. It refers to his unknown wife's death date in 1780, and it would have been easy to mistake that for James' death date when this otherwise sparse profile was created. There is not one other item of information that conflicts with this merger!
    posted by Bartley McRorie
    I'm confused on how to proceed. As the profile manager for Farmer-2033, I've tried to approve this merger because the profile for Farmer-2901 appears to serve no purpose. But the form continues to list this as a rejected match. How do we overcome the rejection?
    posted on Farmer-2901 (merged) by Gary Taylor
    Farmer-2901 and Farmer-2033 do not represent the same person because: As I said before, having the same name is not a match. There is NO information that proves they are the same person. Do real research and stop trying to merge just on name alone.
    posted by Thomas Cheatham
    I did some real research, and could not find any James Farmer who died "about 1780." Which is the only "fact" connected to the profile of Farmer-2901. My research came up with a plausible theory of how this profile came to mistakenly be! (See the previous comment.) How else are we to treat this profile. With no connections, no other dates, no parents, no hints, no sources, no suggestions... what else can we do? As Gary Taylor commented on Farmer-2901, "Merging these two would simply eliminate Farmer-2901." Which is a good thing! If 2901 had any connection or some other valid reason to stay in existence, than I could ignore it. But for the health of our one-family-tree it needs to be pruned! If someone can come up with real sources and different connections, then he can be easily re-entered into WikiTree again. I don't understand the opposition, please help me. I love the collaborative aspect of WikiTree, and look forward to more discussion.
    posted by Bartley McRorie
    edited by Bartley McRorie
    I'm not trying to be difficult but I don't believe merging for the sake of cleaning up the tree is a good thing. The person who posted the other profile needs to either edit theirs, remove it, do more research on their end or whatever else to correct the matter. If this Farmer is not a relation then we are adding in non family members as well as all their ancestors and descendants.
    posted by Thomas Cheatham
    I sent a private message to the original creator of Farmer-2901 requesting more info. Unfortunately, she has not had any contributions to WikiTree for over a year. Since she has not responded to either of the previous merge proposals, I don't know if we will hear from her, but I wanted to try. Thomas, I would like more detail about what you mean when you said, "If this Farmer is not a relation then we are adding in non family members as well as all their ancestors and descendants." Especially considering that Farmer-2901 has no descendants and no ancestors. In fact, he is "unconnected." If he had any descendants or ancestors at all, we would not be having this discussion.
    posted by Bartley McRorie
    Farmer-2901 and Farmer-2033 appear to represent the same person because: they have the same name. And that's about all there is. The only other item available is the death date, but that is uncertain! The misreading of the death date may have come from a misunderstanding of the DAR file. It refers to his unknown wife's death date in 1780, and it would have been easy to mistake that for James' death date when this otherwise sparse profile was created. There is not one other item of information that conflicts with this merger!
    posted on Farmer-2901 (merged) by Bartley McRorie
    Farmer-2901 and Farmer-2033 appear to represent the same person because: they have the same name. And that's about all there is. The only other item available is the death date, but that is uncertain! The misreading of the death date may have come from a misunderstanding of the DAR file. It refers to his unknown wife's death date in 1780, and it would have been easy to mistake that for James' death date when this otherwise sparse profile was created. There is not one other item of information that conflicts with this merger!
    posted by Bartley McRorie
    As the profile manager for Farmer-2033, I would have no quarrel with a merger. But looking at this profile for Farmer-2901 leaves me wondering how a profile like this is created--with no birth date or sources and an uncertain death year. Merging these two would simply eliminate Farmer-2901. Can anyone explain the creation of Farmer-2901?
    posted on Farmer-2901 (merged) by Gary Taylor
    Farmer-2033 and Farmer-2901 do not represent the same person because: More information needed. Date of death differs by 20 years and no other information matches.
    posted on Farmer-2901 (merged) by Thomas Cheatham
    Farmer-2901 and Farmer-2033 appear to represent the same person because: They have the same name. And that's about all there is. The only other item available is the death date, but that is uncertain! Farmer-2901 has no other connections at all that would indicate he is a different person from Farmer-2033.
    posted by Bartley McRorie
    Farmer-3036 and Farmer-2033 appear to represent the same person because: They have the same parents. And before the merge of Marlin "Billy" Farmer (Farmer-2900) into Martin "Billy" Farmer (Farmer-2633 they were their fathers! So, a son in common too. The only difference is the birth year, which needs to be researched.
    posted by Bartley McRorie
    Farmer-4505 and Farmer-2634 appear to represent the same person because: Same children, same death date and place.
    posted by Schalk Wilhelm Pienaar
    Farmer-2033 and Farmer-4505 appear to represent the same person because: Same parents, same birth date. Source needed for death date.

    Rejected matches › James Farmer (1762-)