Charlotte who was illegitimate, was born in 1750 the reputed daughter of Henry, son of Daniel Finch, Earl of Winchilsea. [1]. She is mentioned in Henry's will, along with her three siblings, and their possible mother Elizabeth Hands, to whom Henry left £2,000. Charlotte's inheritance was to be paid to her on 18 July 1771, when she most likely would have been 21 years old.
She married Thomas Raikes, Governor of the Bank of England, on 8 December 1774 at St George, Bloomsbury, married by Richard Raikes, marriage witnesses John Mason and Henry Finch [2]. The marriage witness Henry Finch was most likely her oldest brother, who was also mentioned in their fathers will.
Charlotte died about 9 March 1822 at Petersham, Surrey. She was buried on 15 March 1822 Bromley, Kent [3]
Her estate valued at less than £5000 was not settled until 11 January 1881, probated to Horatio Fitzroy, the surviving executor of the will of her daughter, Georgiana. [4]
↑ London Metropolitan Archives, SAINT GEORGE, BLOOMSBURY, Register of marriages, 1767 Feb-1777 Feb, P82/GEO1/016
Source Information
Ancestry.com. London, England, Marriages and Banns, 1754-1921 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2010.
↑ "England Deaths and Burials, 1538-1991," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:J8HX-13V : accessed 17 January 2016), Charlotte Raikes, 15 Mar 1822; citing , reference ; FHL microfilm 1,042,456.
↑ National Probate Calendar (Charlotte Raikes died on or about 9 March 1822, Petersham, Surrey. Estate valued under £5000. Probate granted to Horatio Fitzroy of Frogmore Park, Hampshire, the surviving executor of the will of Georgiana Fitzroy, daughter)
See also
Wikipedia biography of her grandfather, Daniel Finch [2]
Wikipedia biography of her husband, Thomas Raikes [3]
Is Charlotte your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Charlotte by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Charlotte: