WikiTree profile Galbraith-89 created through the import of STITES (Rbt Sept-7-2011).ged on Sep 9, 2011 by Jim X.
WikiTree profile Galbraith-140 created through the import of STITES (Rbt Sept-9-2011).ged on Sep 11, 2011 by Robert Stites.
WikiTree profile Galbraith-103 created through the import of STITES (Rbt Sept-7-2011).ged on Sep 9, 2011 by Jim X.
WikiTree profile Galbraith-154 created through the import of STITES (Rbt Sept-9-2011).ged on Sep 11, 2011 by Robert Stites.
Is Janet your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Would that account for the three Janet's now in the family because of earlier merges with two of them called GALLOWAY rather than GALBRAITH?
If so, need to merge Galloway-331 and Galloway-335 each directly into the final target Galbraith-103 to eliminate duplicates.
Would that account for the three Janet's now in the family because of earlier merges with two of them called GALLOWAY rather than GALBRAITH?
If so, need to merge Galloway-331 and Galloway-335 each directly into the final target Galbraith-103 to eliminate duplicates.
Would that account for the three Janet's now in the family because of earlier merges with two of them called GALLOWAY rather than GALBRAITH?
If so, need to merge Galloway-331 and Galloway-335 each directly into the final target Galbraith-103 to eliminate duplicates.
Would that account for the three Janet's now in the family because of earlier merges with two of them called GALLOWAY rather than GALBRAITH? If so, need to merge Galloway-331 and Galloway-335 each directly into the final target Galbraith-103 to eliminate duplicates.
Would that account for the three Janet's now in the family because of earlier merges with two of them called GALLOWAY rather than GALBRAITH? If so, need to merge Galloway-331 and Galloway-335 each directly into the final target Galbraith-103 to eliminate duplicates.
Would that account for the three Janet's now in the family because of earlier merges with two of them called GALLOWAY rather than GALBRAITH? If so, need to merge Galloway-331 and Galloway-335 each directly into the final target Galbraith-103 to eliminate duplicates.