Esther (Gallup) Stanton died 25 Nov 1815 in Wyoming County, New York.
Sources
↑ Connecticut: Vital Records (The Barbour Collection), 1630-1870 (Online Database: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2011.) From original typescripts, Lucius Barnes Barbour Collection, 1928. Stonington, page 101: GALLUP, Esther, d. Elisha & Mercy, b. Oct. 15,1750. [First written "Desiah"].
↑ Book Title: The genealogical history of the Gallup Family in the United States : also, biographical sketches of members of the family
Denison Genealogy: Ancestors and Descendants of Captain George Denison; E. Glenn Denison, Josephine M. Peck and Donald L. Jacobus; Gateway Press, Inc. Baltimore, MD 1993 [Originally published, Pequot Press 1963; Reprinted, Baltimore, MD 1978, 1982, 1993], no. 702: https://archive.org/details/denisongenealogy00deni/page/25/mode/1up
Ancestry.com, comp. "U.S., Sons of the American Revolution Membership Applications, 1889-1970", Volume 144 Ancestry.com. Accessed June 23, 2016.
Ancestry.com, comp. "North America, Family Histories, 1500-2000" Book Title: The genealogical history of the Gallup Family in the United States : also, biographical sketches of members of the family. Author and Publisher: Ancestry.com. Published 2016. Accessed 23 June 2016. http://www.Ancestry.com
U.S., Sons of the American Revolution Membership Applications, 1889-1970 Ancestry.com Publication: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011.Original data - Sons of the American Revolution Membership Applications, 1889-1970. Louisville, Kentucky: National Society of the Sons of the American Revolution. Microfilm, 508 rolls
Connecticut, Church Record Abstracts, 1630-1920 Ancestry.com Repository: 22 AUG 2016 Time: 21:25:37
Web: RootsWeb Cemetery Index, 1800-2010 Ancestry.com Publication: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc. 22 AUG 2016 Time: 21:25:34
Is Esther your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Esther by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
Mitochondrial DNA test-takers in the direct maternal line:
Gallup-642 and Gallup-576 appear to represent the same person because: Same parents, same husband, same death data. Different birth dates, though.
The identified parents had a daughter Esther in 1750 (I added the record to the Gallup-576 profile) and they were too young to be the parents of a daughter born in 1741. If the woman who married Phineas Stanton was of an age to have been born in 1741, then she had to have had different parents -- and I've not yet found a record for an Esther Gallup born in 1741. If the woman who married Phineas Stanton was of an age to be born in 1750, then there's no discrepancy. There were other Esther Gallups, so determination of which one married Phineas Stanton could depend on sources like wills and deeds that indicate family relationships, or death records that indicate ages. However, she is identified as having a child born in 1791, which makes it more likely that she was born in 1750 than 1741.
ADDED: And I see there was another child in 1795. That makes the 1741 birth date extremely unlikely!
The identified parents had a daughter Esther in 1750 (I added the record to the Gallup-576 profile) and they were too young to be the parents of a daughter born in 1741. If the woman who married Phineas Stanton was of an age to have been born in 1741, then she had to have had different parents -- and I've not yet found a record for an Esther Gallup born in 1741. If the woman who married Phineas Stanton was of an age to be born in 1750, then there's no discrepancy. There were other Esther Gallups, so determination of which one married Phineas Stanton could depend on sources like wills and deeds that indicate family relationships, or death records that indicate ages. However, she is identified as having a child born in 1791, which makes it more likely that she was born in 1750 than 1741.
ADDED: And I see there was another child in 1795. That makes the 1741 birth date extremely unlikely!