no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Jane (Garwood) Shinn (abt. 1636 - 1717)

Jane Shinn formerly Garwood aka Webb [uncertain]
Born about in Englandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Daughter of [uncertain] and [uncertain]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married about 1655 in Freckenham, Suffolk, Englandmap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 80 in Springfield, Burlington County, Province of New Jerseymap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Edward Nelson private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 11 Jun 2011
This page has been accessed 2,678 times.

Contents

Biography

Jane Shinn was born in 1642. Jane Shinn Webb passed away in 1712. [1]

Research Notes

Place of birth has been changed from Soham, Cambridgeshire to England until stronger sources are added. There are no baptisms for a Jane Garwood or similar names in Soham, Cambridgeshire, England between 1631-1644.[2]

Her mother's profile has a Joan, daughter of Edmund Garwood baptized in Ipswich, Suffolk, but is it proven she belongs to the parents currently attached?

"Joan christened 11 Apr 1642 in Ipswich, Suffolk, England"[3]

Sources

  1. Entered by Edward Nelson, Monday, August 12, 2013.
  2. The Cambridgeshire History Society: Transcriptions of the Parish Registers of Soham (Cambridgeshire, England) http://www.cfhs.org.uk
  3. "England Births and Christenings, 1538-1975," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:NRHR-Q9J : 30 December 2014, Edmund Garwood in entry for Joan Garwood, 11 Apr 1642); citing SAINT NICHOLAS,IPSWICH,SUFFOLK,ENGLAND, index based upon data collected by the Genealogical Society of Utah, Salt Lake City; FHL microfilm 0991948 IT 7, 12, 599889.

See also:

  • Judith M. Olsen, LIPPINCOTT 5 Generations of the Descendants of Richard & Abigail LIPPINCOTT" (Woodbury, NJ, Gloucester County Historical Society, 1982)

Acknowledgments

  • Thank you to Edward Nelson for creating Webb-4025 on 12 Aug 13.
  • WikiTree profile UNKNOWN-86646 created through the import of Cogan Moore Stiles Wiley_2011-07-09.ged on Jul 9, 2011 by Eileen Cogan.
  • This profile includes the import of pshinn geneology 2011-6-7.ged on Jun 11, 2011 by Paul Shinn; and the import of Watkins.ged on 04 April 2011




Is Jane your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Jane by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Jane:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 10

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Garwood-10 and Garwood-705 appear to represent the same person because: The parents and husband are the same
posted on Garwood-705 (merged) by Carol Lillevang
Garwood-10 and Garwood-705 appear to represent the same person because: The parents and husband are the same
posted on Garwood-705 (merged) by Carol Lillevang
It seems like last name at birth should be Garwood given the parentage and Webb should be in other last name.
posted on Garwood-705 (merged) by Marty (Lenover) Acks
Garwood-10 and UNKNOWN-86646 appear to represent the same person because: Both Janes have the same spouse and the same daughter, Martha.
posted by Star Kline
Garwood-10 and Garwood-200 are not ready to be merged because: see comments on profile
posted by Katie Pyle
Garwood-200 and Garwood-10 appear to represent the same person because: same spouse-discrepancy with dates though, same parents which also need to be merged
posted by Katie Pyle
Garwood-200 and Garwood-10 are not ready to be merged because: Until birth and death dates are reconciled; as well as place of death, I propose we postpone. My informain comes from the Shinn family bible which is in the possession of my brother, Robert. I do believe these two records represent the same person. Ed Nelson
posted by Edward Nelson
Garwood-200 and Garwood-10 appear to represent the same person because: same spouse
posted by Katie Pyle
Garwood-278 and Garwood-10 appear to represent the same person because: Same spouse
posted by Katie Pyle
Garwood-278 and Garwood-10 appear to represent the same person because: Same spouse
posted by Katie Pyle