no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Elizabeth (Gasesett) Corey (1661 - aft. 1713)

Elizabeth Corey formerly Gasesett
Born in Rhode Islandmap
Daughter of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married about 1679 in Portsmouth, Newport, Rhode Islandmap [uncertain]
Descendants descendants
Died after after age 52 in Rhode Islandmap
Profile last modified | Created 3 Mar 2011
This page has been accessed 4,597 times.
{{{image-caption}}}
Elizabeth (Gasesett) Corey is currently protected by the Native Americans Project for reasons described below.
Join: Native Americans Project
Discuss: native_americans
Due to long held family tradition that she was a Native American, this profile is protected, tracked and co-managed by Wikitree's Native Americans project.

Contents

Disputed Origins

A previous version of this profile claimed she was daughter of Sachem Minnetinka and an Unknown spouse. Lacking any evidence for these parents or any Native origins, these parents have been detached and her name simplified.

"The Cory Family Society genealogists have handwritten notes from circa 1900 from an Edwin Francis Cory who was at that time compiling a family genealogy. Edwin recalls that in his family's possession some 60 years earlier (i.e. circa 1840) there was a written history giving Elizabeth's identity as a native American. See the April 2000 Cory Family Society newsletter for a copy of Edwin Francis Cory's account and the 1993 Reunion transcript (p20-22) for more context." -- Travis Fisher, Attached G2G thread, 16 Oct 2019

Biography

Elizabeth, some say Gasesett, was born about 1661 in Washington County, Rhode Island. Austin provides no maiden name for her.[1]

She died after 1735 in North Kingston, Rhode Island.

She was still living 15 Dec 1713 when she gave consent to son Thomas to be apprenticed to Christopher Lindsay of Newport, house Carpenter.

After John's death in 1712. Elizabeth quitclaimed all right in the second division purchased of Colonial Agents. In 1722, she deeded land to son Thomas. 31 Jan 1726 Elizabeth Corey of Kingstown, residing in Newport, widow of John Corey, deceased of Kingstown, for love etc. conveyed land in East Greenwich to her son Thomas Corey of Newport. Finally, 25 Jan 1735, Elizabeth Corey, resident of Newport, widow and executrix of John Corey late of North Kingstown, conveyed to sons John Corey of North Kingstown and joseph Corey of East Greenwich, lands in East Greenwich, according to the directions of her husbands 1712 will.[2]


She married about 1676 in Portsmouth, Newport Co., RI John Corey by who. She had:

  1. Joseph Corey
  2. William Corey
  3. Elisha Corey
  4. John Corey
  5. Thomas Corey

Unsupported Biography

Narragansett Indian Woman, Minnetinka, was a Narragansett Indian Princess Daughter of Gasesett Chief of the Narragansetts. Here is a story that I composed for my granddaughters. There is some fact, but a lot of fiction for the benifit of young girls. -- Nels Tyring

Dear Natalia:
I know that you are one of the greatest movie fans that I have ever met. I understand that there is a new Disney movie called Pocahontas about an Indian Princess who lived in Virginia about three hundred and fifty years ago. In tracing our family's ancestors I found that you have an Indian Princess for a great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, grandmother who lived at about the same time as Pocahontas. I thought that you might like to know about her.
A very long time ago, there was an Narragansett Indian girl named Minnetinka. She was the daughter of the Chief of the American Indian Nation of the Narragansetts. His name was King Gasesett, and he lived in what is now called Washington County, Rhode Island. If you remember where we went for your Mom and Dad's wedding last summer, that place was a part of his kingdom. He was a very important man, who had responsibility for all the people in his tribe. His kingdom was large, and very rich. It had forests full of game, a long seashore, and many lakes and rivers with lots of fish, and good land to grow corn to be made into the fat corn cakes that our ancestors called Johnnycakes.
This was at a time about fifty years after the Pilgrims landed and settled at Plymouth Massachusetts. At first the Indians and the white people lived together and helped each other. In fact, the Pilgrim settlement would probably not survived it's first winter without the help of the Indians who lived nearby. But as more and more white settlers came they needed more and more land on which to live. The Indians believed that everyone in their Nations owned all of the land in the Nation and that anyone, in the tribe, could use any part of that land. The Settlers believed that the land that they lived on belonged to them and that they were the only ones who could use it. Because of these two ideas about the use of land there were a great many misunderstandings between the Indians and the Settlers.
In that fifty years, a great deal of Indian Nations lands in Massachusetts had been taken from the Indians by the Settlers for their own use. The people of the Indian Nations had been forced to move away from these settlements again and again. Since the Indians didn't understand the way the Settlers thought about land there were many disagreements between the two groups. In the Massachusetts Colony the Indians were being treated in a worse way every year. Their were dying of Europian diseases, their lands and homes were taken, their children were captured and sold as slaves, and they had to obey laws that they didn't understand and didn't make sense the Indians. Because of this behavior in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, and because they wanted more religious freedom, some Settlers who didn't agree with the way things were going in the Puritan Settlements moved to the area around Newport, Rhode Island. This Colony was headed by a man named Roger Williams. Williams believed in respect for all men and freedom of religion. There, the Indians were treated as good neighbors and their rights and customs were respected.
One of the settlers who moved from Salem Massachusetts was William Corey who came to Portsmouth, Rhode Island in about 1650. He indentured himself (promised to work part time for the settlement for five years) and was given eight acres of land on which to build a home and a farm. In about 1655 he married Mary Earle and in 1658 they had a son who they named John after his grandfather in Bristol, England. William was a farmer, a carpenter,(like your Dad) and a he ran a mill that ground the grain he and his neighbors grew on their farms. He was respected and active in the settlement's affairs. In his later years he served in the General Assembly which governed the Colony.
His son John grew up to be handsome and tall, and a good citizen, with respect for his Indian neighbors. As he got older he frequently visited the Narragansett Indian Nation across the bay to hunt and fish and became a friend of several of the young men in the tribe. He noticed a beautiful Indian girl named Minnetinka who also seemed to notice him, but he was told that he should not hope to become friendly with her because her father was the King. But the more he visited the people across the bay and the more he noticed Minnetinka the more he wanted to know her and the more she wanted to know him. So, after a while they began to meet and to talk and after a longer while they began to fall in love. After some more time they knew that they had to be together and so they gathered up their courage and went to the King. They told the King that they loved each other very much and that they wanted to marry and raise a family. The King thought about this long and hard, but after a while decided that since John was a good friend of the Narragansett Nation and that his father, William was a member of the Colony across the bay that had treated the Narragansetts with respect, that he would allow them to Marry.
He gave them some land for a house and a farm, because by then he understood that was the Settlers way, in the town of North Kingston. After a while they had a son that they called John, who had a son called John, who had a son called Paris, who had a son called John, who had a son called John, who had a son called John, who had a daughter called Edith, who had a son called Nels, who married a girl called Joan, who had a daughter called Kristen, who has a beautiful daughter called Natalia, who has a brother called Colin and a Daddy called Smitty. And as near as I can tell they all have lived happily ever after and continue to right up to this day
Love
Grandpa.

Sources

  1. Austin, John Osborne. Genealogical Dictionary of Rhode Island: Comprising Three Generations of Settlers Who Came Before 1690 : With Many Families Carried to the Fourth Generation. (Albany: J. Munsell Sons, 1887) p 56
  2. "Corrections and Additions Cory. Rhode Island Roots. 19:62. (1993) [https://www.americanancestors.org/DB487/i/13653/62/27734279 Link at AmericanAncestors ($)]






Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Elizabeth by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Elizabeth:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 7

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Christian Alexander Boudreau has written a detailed analysis of the historical lines of evidence regarding Elizabeth's possible Native origin:

http://www.coryfamsoc.com/articles/Gasesett-Explanation.pdf

posted by Travis Fisher
The analysis does demonstrate that the tradition of Elizabeth being of Native descent did start long before the Internet. But I don't see any evidence that the tradition started prior to 1904. AND neither Boudreau the author nor the other authors that Boudreau cites, reference any reliable evidence or documentation for any of the "assertions" that any of them make. While Boudreau is convinced, I am not. What do other make of this?

Chronology of the tradition/assertions (dates are publication dates of the "sources" that Boudreau reviewed):

4 Jan 1904: John married Elizabeth, name wanted

27 Jan 1904: John (2) Corey said, but not proved, to have married a daughter of a chief of the Narragansetts...”

17 Feb 1904: John Cory married an Indian

23 Mar 1904: John the second” (“John Cory Senior”) (born circa 1658) was married to an “Indian” (who “Mason” refers to as “Minnetin Ka, daughter of chief of Narragansetts”) however, “Mason” had yet to locate any “Authority” to confirm this claim"

13 Apr 1904: "By various authorities it is stated that John (2) Cory (William 1) married Elizabeth, daughter of a Narragansett chief."

1958: “Elizabeth (probably Gasesett)” (Elizabeth Gasesett), who “is traditionally supposed to have been the daughter of a Chief of the Naragansett Indians, whose name was Minnetinka, which she changed to the English one of Elizabeth” married “John Corey” (John Cory Senior) (who was born circa 1660 to “William Corey of Portsmouth, R. I.” (William Cory) and “Mary Earle”).

1972: "John Corey” (John Cory Senior), “the eldest son” of “William Corey” (William Cory) and “Mary Earle” was born circa 1655 (other sources discussed in this summary say that he was born circa 1658) at Portsmouth, Rhode Island and that John Senior was married to “an Indian” (no name provided for this “Indian” wife). "

1979: "This John Corey’s parents were John and Elizabeth Corey (this Elizabeth was said to be the daughter of and Indian chief)"

Summer 1980: "Notes suggest John Corey/Cory of Portsmouth & N Kingston RI, m Elizabeth Gasesett, dau/Narragansett Chief Gasesett, c1679. Want information, opinions...”

1988: John Corey” (John Cory Senior) (born circa 1655? to “William Corey” and “Mary Earle” at Portsmouth, Rhode Island) married “Elizabeth Gasesett” circa 1679?.... Additional: Elizabeth was a Narragansett Indian whose father was reportedly a chief.”

1991: "John Cory” (John Cory Senior) (born September of 1660(?)), son of “William Cory” and of “Mary Earle” married “Elizabeth Gasesett” (born circa 1660 (?)), whose “Father was an Indian Chief,” circa 1678 (?) in North Kingstown, Rhode island."

1994 (same author as 1991): John Cory” (John Cory Senior) (son of “William Cory” and “Mary Earle”) married “Elizabeth Gasesett” circa 1678 (??) in North Kingstown, Rhode Island.... the (birth/Narragansett) name of “Elizabeth Gasesett” (born circa 1660 (?)), wife of “John Cory” (John Cory Senior) (born circa 1658) was “Minnetinka.”

2006: "“... Although William Corey appears to have been among the earliest of Jan's ancestors to have arrived in the colonies, it is important to note that the ancestry of one of his daughters-in-law holds precedence. Elizabeth Minnetinka was the daughter of Gasesett, a Sachem of the Narragansett tribe of Indians. A sachem was somewhat the same as medicine man in other cultures. He often held more influence over the tribesmen than the chief. Her widowed father, Gasesett, placed his daughter in the care of a Quaker couple during King Phillip's War. Sachem Gasesett was killed in a battle with the Mohegan Indians. As a result, his daughter was raised by the English couple. William Corey's son, John Corey, Sr., married Elizabeth Minnetinka about 1679. They had ten children...”

Boudreau concludes that since a sachem died during King Philip's War, that this sachem must have been father of Elizabeth who married John Cory.

There is nothing prior to 1904 about this tradition, and the later 20th century authors appear to be repeating the 1904 claims, although introducing one new (but unsourced) piece of data -- "Gasesett" as the name of the Narragansett chief/sachem / father of Elizabeth.

If any of these later authors cited references for the claims, Boudreau should have made note of it.

posted by Jillaine Smith
I agree its still not convincing. The different 1904 sources at least seem to not just echo each other nor have the same immediate sources (and Edwin Francis Corey explicitly names his earlier source) so at least the tradition is signicantly older than 1904. But that 200 year gap between Elizabeth's life and existing written sources is too big to trust anything.

The only likely way I see this getting resolved is if a matrilinear descendant of Elizabeth is found and DNA tested. Probably none exists though.

posted by Travis Fisher
Dear Tyler: Thank you. My daughter is Audri Lee Niezgoda and she is a Native American descendent through both her paternal and maternal lineage. May I purchase a copy of your book. She is a descendent of Elizabeth Minnetinka and I am her mother, Renee Lizabeth Hickey-Niezgoda, and I am a descendent of Robert Wixam (1629-1686) and Alice Wixam/Wixon d/o Chief Aspinet Nauset of the Algonquin Federation (1567-1623). My father is Warren Wixon Hickey.

Lineage Descendants: Barnabas (Pompwono) Wixam/Wickson (1663-1735) f/o Solomon Wixson (1751-1813) f/o John Wixson (1784-1867) f/o Benjamin Wixson (1824-1907) f/o Lewis James Wixson/Wixon (1879-1954) f/o Rosalie Reay Wixon (1901-1981) m/o Warren Wixon Hickey (1824-1989) f/o Renee Lizabeth Hickey d/o Audri Lee Niezgoda.

Thank you for your attention.

Renee L. Hickey-Niezgoda Mount Pleasant, Isabella County, MI, USA [email address removed] 989-773-7651

Tyler may not see your message. You would be much better off sending the message to him directly using the private comment link on his profile.
posted by Anne B
My DNA shows Native American, and mine connects to hers. It shows 1% Beringian in my ancient DNA, and she is my 9th Great Grandmother. It matches right on the generation. I think you should have searched for evidence before making such a decision. The family is from Rhode Island that goes up into Canada after that then back down into the United States. It was known in my family that our Native side comes in from Canada. That's good enough for me, because DNA is evident, and she's the only Native American I can find by blood in my entire family tree of over 2,000 listings. That would have to be the origin, because the generation is the same given 1%, the family stories match, and there is no others. Chief Cornstalk is my 7th Great Grandfather by marriage to Catherine Vanderpool through John See. I have a whole family made genealogy book on the See Family with about every See Family member listed in the United States, hundreds or more of them from parents to child. It's pretty confirmed to me. I have no questions. It also lists North Native American, South Native American, Mesoamerica, and Native American on other DNA Projects. Corey surname is also in my DNA Matches. I searched all that. Some say marriage unlikely, but they did marry Natives. Catherine Vanderpool among others were well known to have married Natives back then.
posted by Tyler Matters
edited by Tyler Matters
Given the findings discussed in the g2g thread attached to this profile, we are detaching Elizabeth from any parents. Her origins / parents are not known.
posted by Jillaine Smith

G  >  Gasesett  |  C  >  Corey  >  Elizabeth (Gasesett) Corey

Categories: Native American Adjunct