no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Benajah Geer (bef. 1744)

Benajah Geer
Born before in Preston, New London County, Connecticutmap
Ancestors ancestors
[spouse(s) unknown]
[children unknown]
Died [date unknown] [location unknown]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Harold Templeton private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 9 Aug 2013
This page has been accessed 213 times.

Contents

Biography

Birth

Benajah Geer was born October 2, 1737 in Preston, New London County, Connecticut. However, this may have been the date on which he was christened, with his birth obviously sometime before that.[1]

User ID

User ID: 24154F1FE09D5B4FB84DA5EA2DDB5F00C942
User ID: B8E1738731BC78438786C733B025FAFA0BE7

Data Changed

Prior to import, this record was last changed June 18, 2003.

Sources

  • Source: S305Ancestral File of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. Submitted by Dianne Wood, P.O. Box 111 , Mount Blanchard, OH 45867-0111 (submission AF92-105614) and Sally Lou Geer Kelly, American Embassy - State, APO AP 96440 (submission AF95-107971) and many others.
  1. Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906. Database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F74M-278 : accessed 29 June 2015), Benajah Geer, 02 Oct 1737; citing ; FHL microfilm unknown.

Acknowledgments

Thank you to Harold Templeton for creating WikiTree profile Geer-284 through the import of Shirley.ged on Aug 8, 2013. Click to the Changes page for the details of edits by Harold and others.






Is Benajah your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Benajah's ancestors' DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 2

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Geer-287 and Geer-284 appear to represent the same person because: Hi, these appear to be duplicate profiles of the same person but have been set as unmerged matches for some reason. Could the PM take a look and consider if a merger is appropriate? Thanks for your consideration in advance.
Geer-287 and Geer-284 are not ready to be merged because: These may be the same person but we need more proof. We have a record for the 1737 birth but not the 1744 birth. The Benajah listed in the Ancestral File (2797-W6C) has been corrected from 1744 to 1737 since the 1737 birth record was attached as a source. Someone may have made an error and it has been carried forward. Any help with this would be greatly appreciated.
posted by Harold Templeton

G  >  Geer  >  Benajah Geer