Sarah, "wife of John Bradley" was born on 12 February 1705/06.[1]
Sarah was baptized at the Dutch Reformed Church on 30 Aug. 1705.
She received her portion of her father's estate from her "father in Law" Moses Dimon on 4 January 1725/26 and recorded at Fairfield.[2]
Shortly after receiving this legacy, on 13 January 1725/26 at Greenfield Hill Church, she married John Bradley.[3]
Sources
↑ “Greenfield Hill Church Records, Vol. 1, 1668-1833, database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-CS3F-J9FW-T : 11 April 2022), , FHL microfilm 007626803, image 27, Fairfield, Connecticut, Greenfield or Northwest Society and Church, Volume 1, Part III, Page 3.
↑ “Probate Records, v. 6-8, 1717-1750”, database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QSQ-G92K-TK2K : 23 April 2021), , FHL microfilm 007627301, image 289, Fairfield, Fairfield, Connecticut, Vol 7, 1721-1750, Page 70.
↑ “Greenfield Hill Church Records, Vol. 1, 1668-1833, database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-CS3F-J9FX-Z : 17 May 2022), , FHL microfilm 007626803, image 92, Fairfield, Connecticut, Greenfield or Northwest Society and Church, Volume 1, Part III, Page 188.
Page 40: "1767 14th April Sarah wife of Lt Jno Bradley died with Small Pox aged 61 years"
Ancestry.com. The New England Historical & Genealogical Register, 1847-2011 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011.
Original data: New England Historic Genealogical Society. The New England Historical and Genealogical Register. Boston: The New England Historic Genealogical Society.
Original data: Bailey, Frederic W. Early Connecticut Marriages as Found on Ancient Church Records Prior to 1800. Baltimore, MD: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1997.
Is Sarah your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Sarah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Sarah: