↑ 2.02.1 White, Lorraine Cook, ed. The Barbour Collection of Connecticut Town Vital Records. Vol. 1-55. "New London." Baltimore, MD, USA: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1994-2002. (p. 187)
New London County CTGenWeb : It's About Time - Colonial History Timeline Compiled by Bill DeCoursey 1727 - Samuel Griffing : Citing COLLECTIONS of the NEW YORK GENEALOGICAL AND BIOGRAPHICAL SOCIETY, vol. VI, Part II, "Register of Pedigrees", v.II, p.134-135; Wurts' MAGNA CHARTA, v.5, pp.1368-1370.
Is Samuel your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Samuel by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Samuel:
Griffing-315 and Griffin-146 appear to represent the same person because: Same person - the last name Griffing is not the common spelling, and should be Griffin
Mary, this Samuel who was/is husband of Ann (Avery) Griffin is not the father of Samuel Griffin who lived in Killingworth. He is instead the son of Thomas and Ann. I'm disconnecting him from the Samuel of Killingworth whose parents are unknown and linking him back to Ann Avery. Once the merge goes through you should be fine. All these different Samuel Griffines and all these Avery's - very confusing. I double checked.