↑ Citing this Record:"United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:M85S-6RT : 4 April 2020), Franklin Cox in household of Richard Cox, Brooklyn, Schuyler, Illinois, United States; citing family 79, NARA microfilm publication M432 (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.).Digital Folder - Number: 004181045--Record Number: 4545-- Affiliate Film Number: 128--GS Film Number: 442916--Image Number: 00115--Indexing Project (Batch) Number: N00994-3
↑ Citing this Record: "United States Census, 1860", database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MXHT-4G1 : 19 March 2020), John G Stoneking in entry for Richard Cox, 1860.Affiliate Name: The U.S. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) --Affiliate Publication Number: M653--Affiliate Film Number: 228--GS Film Number: 803228--Digital Folder Number: 005165798--Image Number: 00308 -- Indexing Project (Batch) Number: N01707-1
Schuyler County Marriages, Volume 1, Page 83, License #714.
Illinois Marriage Index (Illinois State Archives)
1880 Federal Census
Is Elizabeth your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Elizabeth by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Elizabeth: