Dock Holland Harris was born May 3, 1876, the son of Jeter Harris and Sletter Padgett Harris[1].
In 1880, he lived with his parents and siblings in Emanuel County, Georgia[2].
He married Emma Lee Murphy (later Hutcheson).
His WWI registration card shows his occupation as 'farmer' employed by his brother Drew Harris[3].
Dock Harris WWI registration card |
He appears as head of household on the Emanuel County 1900 with Emma and son Walter[4].
At some point between 1900 and 1910, his and Emma's marriage dissolved, because, on the 1910 Census[5], Dock, Walter, and daughter Carrie lived with Dock's parents and two siblings in Georgia.
According to my father, Billy Moseley, son of Carrie Harris and Marion Moseley, her first husband George Swain had a reputation for being mean. She had left her husband and, when he and his brother came to the house to take her and she refused, George rushed toward the house, his brother staying behind at a distance. Dock intervened, got his gun, but it jammed; as he got it working again he stepped forward into the doorway to shoot, causing George to turn and run. Dock, George, and Nick began shooting at each other. Dock was killed, Nick arrested and George escaped. [6]
Dock Harris obit |
Dock died 17 November 1918 in Elza, near Reidsville, Tattnall County, Georgia and was buried in Cedar Grove Methodist Church Cemetery, Tattnall County, Georgia, USA [1].
From Reports of Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia, Volume 149
Swain: v. The: State. Gilbert, J. 1. The court permitted a witness for the State to testify that the defendant, George Swain, drove up to the scene of the killing, and his wife said “La, yonder is George!” “George Swain came to the gate and asked me where was his wife. When he asked me where was his wife she told me to tell him she was not there, that she was up at my father's, Mr. Beecher’s.” This evidence was admissible as a part of the res gestae, as against the objections that it was hearsay, not spoken in the presence of the defendant, and that it was the saying of the defendant’s wife, who was not a competent witness as against the accused. Marcus V. State, 149 Ga. 209 (7), 210 (99 S. E. 614), and authorities cited; 1 Wharton's Crim. Ev. 511; and see Woolfolk V. State, 85 Ga. 101, 102 (11 S. E. 814).
2. The court permitted a witness for the State to testify that “Nick Swain [jointly indicted with the accused, but not on trial] when the shooting was taking place came up near the cotton-house and hallooed ‘Pour it into him;’ hallooed this all the time the shooting was taking place.” This evidence was not inadmissible on the ground “that Nick Swain was not on trial, and that anything said or done by Nick Swain at the time referred to by the witness was inadmissible as evidence as against the movant;" the same being res gestae declarations.
3. The court permitted a witness for the State to testify as follows: “I know that George Swain separated from his wife. They were separated at the time Dock Harris was killed. They separated about three weeks before Dock Harris was killed by George Swain. They were at my home when they separated. I did not hear them say much. Carrie [movant’s wife] asked me to lend her a dress to wear to her brother's funeral, as she did not have one of her own to wear, except a dirty one. She had a coat suit, and George made her pull it off, and George told her that she could go, that they couldn’t get along together, that they couldn’t live together, and she could just go and do the best she could and he would do the same; and that was all brought about because she wanted to go to her brother’s funeral. He took the coat suit and left her. I let her have shoes and hat also. After the funeral was over, she went back to her father's and continued to live there until her father was killed. He made her take off her coat suit, shoes, and hat.” This evidence was admissible to ascertain motive and explain conduct of the accused (Penal Code, § 1023), and was not inadmissible on the ground that the wife could not testify against the husband. Marcus V. State, supra.
4. When, in a prosecution for homicide, dying declarations are sought to be admitted, the court must. first determine from preliminary evidence whether prima facie they are competent as such and were made under circumstances entitling them to admission. There being evidence that the deceased was “conscious that he was going to die,” that he said “he was killed,” the attending physician having sworn that he was in the article of death, and that he did die the next morning after having been shot, the court did not err in admitting the evidence. Washington v. State, 137 Ga. 218, 222 (73 S. E. 512).
5. After having admitted the dying declarations referred to in the next preceding headnote, it was for the jury to finally pass on the question whether or not such declarations of the deceased were actually made and were conscious utterances in the apprehension and immediate prospect of death. A charge which did not so instruct the jury but may be so construed that the jury might infer that they must take such declarations as evidence in the ease, without a qualification that they must finally determine whether such declarations were made, and, if so, whether they were made at a time when the deceased was in the article of death and conscious of his condition, was error. The court having failed to so instruct the jury, the error requires the grant of a new trial. Bush v. Slate, 109 Ga. 120 (4), 125 (34 S. E. 298), and authorities cited.
6. The remaining assignments of error are without merit. Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent.
No. 1486. DECEMBER 12, 1919.
Indictment for murder. Before Judge Sheppard. Tattnall superior court. April 29, 1919.
A. S. Way and H. H. Elders, for plaintiff in error. Clifford Walker, attorney-general, J. Sexton Daniel, solicitor general, and M. C. Bennet, contra. [7]
Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
Featured National Park champion connections: Dock is 17 degrees from Theodore Roosevelt, 23 degrees from Stephanus Johannes Paulus Kruger, 16 degrees from George Catlin, 16 degrees from Marjory Douglas, 20 degrees from Sueko Embrey, 17 degrees from George Grinnell, 28 degrees from Anton Kröller, 17 degrees from Stephen Mather, 22 degrees from Kara McKean, 16 degrees from John Muir, 19 degrees from Victoria Hanover and 26 degrees from Charles Young on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.
H > Harris > Dock Holland Harris
Categories: Tattnall County, Georgia | Murder Victims | Cedar Grove Methodist Church Cemetery, Tattnall County, Georgia