Is Hannah your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Hannah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Hannah:
The merge sounds like it makes sense. Since you have the documentation I will leave it to you to correct "current last name" and any other facts you have and note the documentation. Thanks for finding this!
Harris-8631 and Harris-8630 appear to represent the same person because: These two are identical. According to Ancient Families of Wethersfield Hannah was born February 11, 1670 and married first a man whose surname was Cook, and second a man whose surname was Sprague.
Harris-17874 and Harris-7083 appear to represent the same person because: Though these two appear to differ quite a bit, I have found documentary evidence that they are the same person. Hannah was the last born of 10 children of Daniel Harris and his wife Mary (Weld) Harris. She was born 11 Feb 1670 and married twice: first to a man whose surname was Cook and second to a man whose surname was Sprague. Please contact me if you have any questions.