Mary passed away in 1906 and was laid to rest in the Musick Family Cemetery in Clinchport, Scott County, Virginia [1]
Mary was born in Pike County, Kentucky in 1829. [1] She married Elexious Musick in 1850 [7]. She passed away in Scott County, Virginia in 1906 [1].
Sources
↑ 1.01.11.21.3 Find a Grave, database and images (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/234301649/mary-musick: accessed 05 June 2023), memorial page for Mary “Polly” Hatfield Musick (29 Jan 1829–1906), Find A Grave: Memorial #234301649, citing Musick Family Cemetery, Gate City, Scott County, Virginia, USA; Maintained by Kentucky Hill Hunter (contributor 47428064).
Source: Title: Ancestry Family Trees Publication: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: The Generations Network. Original data: Family Tree files submitted by Ancestry members. Note: This information comes from 1 or more individual Ancestry Family Tree files. This source citation points you to a current version of those files. Note: The owners of these tree files may have removed or changed information since this source citation was created. Page: Ancestry Family Trees Note: Data: Text: http://trees.ancestry.com/pt/AMTCitationRedir.aspx?tid=6735994&pid=4321
WikiTree profile Hatfield-372 created through the import of GedTem12:18.ged on Dec 19, 2011 by Jack Templeton. See the Changes page for the details of edits by Jack and others.
Is Polly your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Polly by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Polly:
Hatfield-1423 and Hatfield-372 appear to represent the same person because: Since you're not on the Trusted List of Hatfield-1423 you can't complete this merge right now, but you can propose a merge for the manager of Hatfield-1423 to approve.
Hatfield-1423 and Hatfield-372 appear to represent the same person because: Hatfield-1423 and Hatfield-372 are marked as previously rejected matches. However, they clearly represent the same Mary Hatfield, wife of Elexious Musick III. The only difference is the birthday on 1 profile shows Jan 5 vs Jan 29 1829. Find a Grave shows Jan 29. The sources listed for the Jan 5th birthday is the 1880 census, which only gives the estimated birth year, not the actual birth date.
Hatfield-1423 and Hatfield-372 appear to represent the same person because: They have the same vital information. If they can't be merged at this time, then an unmerged match needs completed.
Hatfield-1423 and Hatfield-372 are not ready to be merged because: I am not on the trusted list, so cannot complete the merge. However, Hatfield-1423 and Hatfield-372 are clear duplicates from everything I see. Need a profile owner or someone on trusted list to complete the merge. Thank you!
Thank you Jessica. I am not on the Trusted List for either of these profiles so cannot complete the merge. I've reinitiated the merge and created an unmerged match again. If you agree that this is a duplicate, would you complete the merge since you are one of the profile owners?
edited by Deborah (Gehlert) Roesler