no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Sarah (Henderson) Isbell (1758 - 1827)

Sarah Isbell formerly Henderson
Born in Wilkes County, North Carolinamap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 1 Jan 1781 in Wilkes County, North Carolinamap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 68 in Pickens, South Carolina, United States of Americamap
Profile last modified | Created 3 Apr 2011
This page has been accessed 1,005 times.

Biography

U.S. Southern Colonies Project logo
Sarah (Henderson) Isbell was a North Carolina colonist.

Sarah was born about 1758. She was buried in the Isbell Cemetery in Oconee County South Carolina. This cemetery is now under the waters of Lake Hartwell. A memorial marker has been placed on the hill behind the Welcome Center on Highway 85 in Oconee County.

Questionable place of birth as some of her siblings are shown as born in Virginia and some born in South Carolina.

Name: Sarah Henderson Gender: Female Spouse: Pendleton Isbell Spouse Gender: Male Bond Date: 1 Jan 1781 Bond #: 000168473 Level Info: North Carolina Marriage Bonds, 1741-1868 ImageNum: 003577 County: Wilkes Record #: 03 028 Bondsman: Aaron Pinson, T; Thomas Shurley Witness: Wm Whitaker Source Information State of North Carolina. An Index to Marriage Bonds Filed in the North Carolina State Archives. Raleigh, NC, USA: North Carolina Division of Archives and History, 1977.

Sara was born in 1758. She passed away in 1827.

Sources


  • Source: S8 North Carolina, Marriages, 1759-1979. Source for marriage date/place. Pendleton Isbell and Sarah Henderson, 01 Jan 1781; citing Wilkes, North Carolina, reference p 28; FHL microfilm 1,730,605.
  • Source: S5 27 Jun 1994 Sarah Coon ltr. Note: This source need better clarification.
  • Isbell Family Cemetery, Oconee County, South Carolina [[1]]
  • Some information taken from a personal book on the Monks Family at the Monks Reunion in 2016. The book was photographed by myself. The facts are not verified but seem accurate.
  • Marriage
  • From Family tree Record LB5T-D32




Is Sarah your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Sarah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Sarah:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 7

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Henderson-18103 and Henderson-662 appear to represent the same person because: same dates and husband
posted by Robin Lee
Henderson-662 and Henderson-1576 appear to represent the same person because: Same first name, last name, maiden name, birth date, death date, death location, same parents , same spouse.
posted by Anonymous Nagel
The tree shown for this line is an unlikely mix of Eastern Shore and Tidewater. Possible, but not likely as shown. If descendants believe this to be an Eastern Shore line, they should coordinate it with the work of Laura Henderson.
posted by Christine Henderson
I have set Henderson-662 and Henderson-1576 to Rejected Match. It now seems clear that they are two different people. Sources are not the best, but they show different birth dates/places, different parents, and different spouses for the two.
posted by Fred Remus III
I have set Henderson-662 and Henderson-1576 to Rejected Match. It now seems clear that they are two different people. Sources are not the best, but they show different birth dates/places, different parents, and different spouses for the two.
posted by Fred Remus III
Henderson-7404 and Henderson-1576 appear to represent the same person because:

This was previously set to unmerged match, I suspect because of the 30-year difference in death date. That notwithstanding, these clearly seem to be the same person. Neither profile provides a credible source. The links are to now-missing Ancestry Trees. Ancestry trees are user-submitted, riddled with conflicts, and usually without any credible supporting source citations. "U.S. & Int'l Marriage Records" is similarly untrustworthy. It is a collection of conflicting data where no one has attempted to verify what, if anything in it, is correct.

I would pick a death date, mark it as uncertain, then explain the conflicting date in the bio section.

Better sources are needed to support anything in these profiles being accurate.

posted by Fred Remus III
Some trees give this Sarah as a daughter of Thomas and Frances Henderson, but I haven't seen what the documentation is for that. (I've set her as an unmerged match rather than a merge candidate.)
posted by Sharon Casteel

H  >  Henderson  |  I  >  Isbell  >  Sarah (Henderson) Isbell

Categories: Goose Creek, Virginia | Pickens County, South Carolina | North Carolina Colonists