no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Sarah (Hickock) Prime (1698 - aft. 1757)

Sarah Prime formerly Hickock aka Root
Born in Woodbury, Litchfield, Connecticutmap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 1723 in Litchfield Co., Connecticutmap
Wife of — married 8 Jan 1728 in Woodbury, Litchfield, Connecticutmap
Descendants descendants
Died after after age 58 in Woodury, Litchfield, Connecticutmap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Martin Lawlor private message [send private message] and Lynda Stevens private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 27 Jun 2014
This page has been accessed 239 times.

Biography

Sarah HICKOK was born [1] 23 Jul 1698 in Woodbury, Litchfield Co., Connecticut. She passed away after 1757.

Sarah Hickock was baptized July 31, 1698 at the Woodbury First Congregational Church. Sarah is mentioned in her father’s will where she and her sister Lois were to receive twenty shillings. The probate record for Thomas Root, October 05, 1727: “Mr Benjamin Hickock and Sarah Roots ye widow who were appointed administrator and administratrix” for the estate of Thomas Roots of Woodbury presented the inventory of the estate of Thomas Roots to the Probate Court of Woodbury. Also mentioned in the probate records is the distribution of the estate to sons, Amos and John Roots.

January 27, 1745/6: Joseph Prime and his wife Sarah and the “heirs of Deacon Benjamin Hicock” made claim to land left to them by Benjamin Hicock which consisted of “thirty two acres of land which our sd father purchased of Timothy Hinman lying in the town of sd Woodbury lying on the south side of Great Chestnut Hill.

Sources

  1. "Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F77K-K4N : accessed 30 April 2016), Benjamin Hiccock in entry for Sarah Hiccock, 23 Jul 1698; citing ; FHL microfilm unknown.
  • Barbour Collection at the Woodbury, Connecticut Vital Records
  • The Hickock Genealogy, Descendants of William Hickock of Farmington, Connecticut; A History of William Hickok A First Settler of Farmington, Con-necticut and William Andrews A First Settler of New Haven, Connecticut and of Their Descendants From 1635 to 1972
  • History of Ancient Woodbury Connecticut;
  • Woodbury, First Congregational Church, 1670–1920 [CSL Film No. 419, FHL Film No. 0006182.
  • Woodbury Probate Packets, 1720–1880 [CSL Film No. 1604].
  • Root, James Pierce, Root and Roots Families in America, 1870.
  • Woodbury land records at the Woodbury Office of the Town Clerk; Vol. 5; Page: 165; Vol. 7; Pages: 29, 133
  • Prime, Ralph Earl. The Descendants of James Prime (G.B. Mottram, Yonkers, N.Y., 1895) Page 6




Is Sarah your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Sarah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Sarah:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 3

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Hickock-81 and Hickock-33 appear to represent the same person because: The date of birth, July 23, 1698, Woodbury, Connecticut, for Sarah Hickock in Hickock-33 is the same date, July 23, 1698, Woodbury, Connecticut, for Sarah Hickock in Hickock-81. I believe them to be the same Sarah Hickock, daughter of Benjamin Hickock and Hannah Skeels.
posted by Martin Lawlor
Hickock-80 and Hickock-33 do not represent the same person because: I came up with Jurusha working backward from Phineas Stephens

I am not a genealogist, but it seems to be documented by other genealogists and historians that Phineas's mother was Olive Franklin who was kidnapped by Indians in 1781 as a child/teenager - young anyway.

It is documented in contemporary newspapers that Olive Franklin's mother was killed by being shot during the rescue in 1781.

The Stevens-Stephens Geneology and DAR show that Jerusha Franklin was Roswell Franklin, Sr's wife.

According to Sarah's birthdate of 1698, she was probably too old to be Olive's mother as Olive was born in circa1766, making Sarah over 60 years old. I am adding pictures of gravestones and markers to the profiles.

Thoughts? I am wondering this was a proposed match? Am I missing something.

posted by Doug Hendy
Hickock-80 and Hickock-33 appear to represent the same person because: Please agree to merge these duplicate profiles. Thanks!
posted by Kay (Johnson) Wilson

H  >  Hickock  |  P  >  Prime  >  Sarah (Hickock) Prime