Mehitable was born in 1723 22 Nov 1723 in Waterbury, New Haven, Connecticut. [1][2]
She married 18 Mar 1740
[3]
and had 12 children with Stephen Seymour
[4]
She passed away in 1767
[1]
and was buried (15 May 1767) at New Haven, Connecticut.
Research Notes
Several spellings
Mehittabell Hickox
Mehitable Hickok
Sources
↑ 1.01.1The Hickok genealogy : descendants of William Hickocks of Farmington, Connecticut, with ancestry of Charles Nelson Hickok; Charles Nelson Hickok; 1938; Rutland, Vt. : The Tuttle publishing company, inc.
↑ Compiled by Jerri Lynn Burket, The Barbour Collection of Connecticut Town Vital Records, Vol. 50 - Waterbury, General Editor - Lorraince Cook White, Baltimore, Genealogical Publishing Co., Inc., 2002, p. 161.
"Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/F77K-XN5 : 11 February 2018), Mehittabell Hikcox, 22 Nov 1723; citing ; FHL microfilm unknown.
"Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/F7WL-V72 : 11 February 2018), Mehitable in entry for Thankfull Saymore, 06 Nov 1743; citing ; FHL microfilm unknown.
"Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/F74T-9JT : 11 February 2018), Mehitable in entry for Gideon Saymore, 24 Sep 1741; citing ; FHL microfilm unknown.
"Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/F7WL-J7R : 11 February 2018), Mehitable in entry for Lydea Saymore, 17 Jun 1754; citing ; FHL microfilm unknown.
"Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/F7WL-VXN : 11 February 2018), Mehitable in entry for Mehittable Saymore, 24 Jul 1759; citing ; FHL microfilm unknown.
"Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/F74T-92F : 11 February 2018), Mehitable in entry for Daniel Saymore, 30 Oct 1748; citing ; FHL microfilm unknown.
"Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/F74T-SQR : 11 February 2018), Mehitable in entry for Zadock Saymore, 30 Apr 1757; citing ; FHL microfilm unknown.
"Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/F74T-SSM : 11 February 2018), Mehitable in entry for Stephen Saymore, 24 Jul 1759; citing ; FHL microfilm unknown.
"Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/F7WL-NG3 : 11 February 2018), Mehitable in entry for Ame Saymore, 07 Jun 1761; citing ; FHL microfilm unknown.
"Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/F74T-97N : 11 February 2018), Mehitable in entry for Amos Saymore, 05 Sep 1766; citing ; FHL microfilm unknown.
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Nathan Boothe for starting this profile.
WikiTree profile Hikcox-3 created through the import of FAMILY 6162011.GED on Jun 20, 2011 by Michael Stephenson. See the Changes page for the details of edits by Michael, Nathan and others.
Is Mehitable your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Mehitable by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Mehitable:
Hopkins-5153 and Hickox-433 appear to represent the same person because: Correct last name is Hickox (several spellings) from her father Samuel - otherwise these are the same person and should be merged.
Hickcox-40 and Hickox-433 appear to represent the same person because: Hickox is an incorrect spelling of the surname. It should be Hickox, Hickox, HIckocks or Hickock.