William was born about 1658. These Hiltons made their home on the Southside of Albany - the residence of choice for a number of soldier families. William Hilton was a would-be trader who may have opened the family inn that became an Albany landmark for many decades.
"Innkeeper William Hilton was the patriarch of the Albany Hilton family. He often was called William Hilton "the elder!" Family resources state that he was born in England and that he emigrated from Leeds in Yorkshire in 1686. At that time, he was about twenty-one-years-old." [1]
Name
William Hilton
Willem Hilten
Birth
1658 in England
BET 1661 AND 1665 Leeds, Yorkshire, England
Marriage
Husband of Anna V. (Brouwer) Hilton — married April 6, 1693 in Reformed Dutch Church, Albany, New York,
Death
Died February 11, 1749 in Albany County, New York, USA
Church records
1693 Apr 06 William Hilte, widr. of Sara Ebb, and Antje Berkhove, of N. Y. [2]
1693 Apr 09 Sara, of William Hilten and Anna Berkhoven. Wit.: Jan Visscher, Sara Visscher. [3]
1695 Jan 23 Anna, of William Hilten and Anna Berkhove. Wit.: Jean Kint, Catrine Wendell. [3]
1696 Dec 10 Elisabeth, of William Hilten and Antje Berkhoven. Wit.: Wouter Van der Zee, Sara Melchertsen. [3]
1698 Nov 20 Mary, of William Hilten and Antje Berkhoven. Wit.: Jan Ratly, Judik Marselis. [3]
1701 Mar 02 Richard, of William and Anneke Hilten. Wit.: John Bennit, Ritchard Bruyas, Marry Ingolsbie. [4]
1703 Feb 10 Elisabeth, of William Hilten and Anna Barko. Wit.: James Parker, Caatje Oothout. [4]
1705 Aug 19 Jacobus, of William Hilten and Anna Barko. Wit.: Henrik Oothout, Anna Delmont. [4]
1708 May 16 William, of William Hilten and Antje Barko. Wit.: Pieter Schuyler, Margrita Colins. [4]
William was born about 1665. He passed away about 1749.
↑ Secretary Henry L. Bogert. "Albany Records, Marriages" in Year Book of the Holland Society of New York. New York: Knickerbocker Press, New York, 1904.
↑ 3.03.13.23.3 Secretary Henry L. Bogert. "Albany Records, Baptisms" in Year Book of the Holland Society of New York. New York: Knickerbocker Press, New York, 1904.
↑ 4.04.14.24.3 Secretary Henry L. Bogert. "Baptisms 1700 to 1725" in Year Book of the Holland Society of New York. New York: Knickerbocker Press, New York, 1905.
WikiTree profile Hilten-3 created through the import of ReevesFamilyMaster_2012_2012-09-25.ged on Sep 25, 2012 by Keith Reeves. See the Changes page for the details of edits by Keith and others.
Research notes
LNAB
Hilten is the surname that appears in all but one of William's church records. He is recorded as "William Hilte" in his marriage record, the n's are clipped from both surnames. Quackenbush-118 07:10, 28 January 2017 (EST)
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Willem by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Willem:
Hilton-2816 and Hilten-5 appear to represent the same person because:
Hi,
I reproposed the merge because they are the same and should be merged, and ... to explain the merge process or how it works if no one responds to a proposal a bit more.. if no one reponds to a merge proposal normally within a month (30 days) the merge is going to be approved by default (by the system) and can be merged. Because they were set a unmerged matches, it will again take a month or so from now if no one responds, but when the month is passed they can be merged. ;)
Hilton-2816 and Hilten-5 appear to represent the same person because: Letting profile manager decide LNAB. Exact same spouse on both profiles with exact same marriage date. Son Reykert on both profiles should be merged next.
Hi,
I reproposed the merge because they are the same and should be merged, and ... to explain the merge process or how it works if no one responds to a proposal a bit more.. if no one reponds to a merge proposal normally within a month (30 days) the merge is going to be approved by default (by the system) and can be merged. Because they were set a unmerged matches, it will again take a month or so from now if no one responds, but when the month is passed they can be merged. ;)
Greets and hope it helps,
Bea :)
Thank you, Teresa (WikiTree Arborist)