no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Edward Hilton (1596 - bef. 1671)

Edward Hilton
Born in Northwich, Cheshire, Englandmap
Husband of — married about 1629 in Englandmap [uncertain]
Husband of — married after 3 Oct 1651 in Exeter, Norfolk, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap [uncertain]
Descendants descendants
Died before before age 74 in Exeter, Norfolk, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap
Profile last modified | Created 13 Sep 2010
This page has been accessed 8,172 times.
The Puritan Great Migration.
Edward Hilton migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640). (See Great Migration Begins, by R. C. Anderson, Vol. 2, p. 947)
Join: Puritan Great Migration Project
Discuss: pgm

Contents

Biography

Edward (bp. 1596 Northwich, Cheshire - d. Oct 1670/Mar 1671 Dover or Exeter, NH.[1]), is the son of William Hilton.[1]

Edward was christened 9 June 1596 at Witton-cum-Twambrooks, Cheshire, England, son of William Hilton. [2]

His family were north sea fishermen and had a monopoly on salt, which was needed to preserve the fish.

Siblings

Edward’s brothers William and Richard also came to America; William Hilton is on the 1621 passenger list the Fortune, the first ship to arrive after the Mayflower.[3] Noyes writes: "The historian Hubbard's statement that Edward and William were brothers, however, seems unquestionable."[4]

Immigration

He came to America in 1628 as part of the Fishmongers Company. He made a return trip to England in 1629, which may be when he married. He came back to New England in 1630, when he was granted land.

Marriage

Edward's first wife, name unknown, died after about 1642. He married Catherine Shapleigh after July 6, 1650.[1]

Edward's children were:[1]

  • Edward, b about 1629
  • William, b about 1631
  • Sobriety, b about 1632
  • Susanna, b about 1633
  • Samuel, b about 1640
  • Charles, b about 1642

Occupation

Edward held various offices. He was magistrate of the Piscataqua Court in the 1660s.

Death

He died in New Hampshire, leaving four sons: Edward, William, Samuel, and Charles, and daughters Mary, Sobriety, and Susanna

Research Notes

This Edward Hilton (1596-bef.1671), son of William may be confused with Edward Hilton (abt. 1600-), son of Charles. Both lay claim to being Edward Hilton, London fishmonger, later of Dover, New Hampshire, brother of William Hilton, also a fishmonger, pioneers on the Piscataqua River.

Disputed identity: The Edward Hilton (abt.1600-) presented as son of Charles Hilton (bef.1565-bef.1612) is in dispute with Edward Hilton (1596-bef.1671) (subject of this profile), and the evidence is inconclusive. Until recently, the accepted genealogical wisdom was that Edward Hilton, London fishmonger freeman in 1921, and later pioneer of the Piscataqua River and Dover, New Hampshire was this man, Edward Hilton (1596-bef.1671), son of William Hilton of Witton (bef.1545-bef.1605). Recently, that theory was brought into doubt with the discovery of a record from "Boyds Inhabitants of London". Edward's documentary connection to the Charles Hilton household is limited to two mentions on a two-page record; he is first noted nine years after Charles had passed, and mentioned again twenty years later. Probably it was his last known address in England. By contrast, there are at least three records connecting Charles son, Paul Hilton, to his parents, his household, his education, his maternal cousin, and maybe even his burial in the St Botolph's. Moreover, while brother Paul was made a freeman by patrimony, Edward was by service. (Patrimony is open only to legitimate and natural children of a male Freeman who was born after their parent's own Freedom admission.) Instead, it has been proposed and circulated that, the Edward Hilton who is mentioned in "Boyds Inhabitants of London" is actually a relation who had been taken in by Charles, one Edward Hilton of Northwich, whose father, William Hilton of Witton, died in 1605, and whose mother died in 1606 and left him an orphan at a tender age. The specifics of the relationship between Charles and William of Witton remain uncertain, they are thought to have been cousins. To be clear, there is no evidence that the Edward Hilton named in the Boyds record is a son of Charles Hilton. There are no birth records for any of Charles Hilton's children

Fishmonger

Edward was a fishmonger.

According to Noyes, Edward Hilton was apprenticed to Marie Hilton, widow of Charles Hilton of London, he was admitted to the Fishmongers Co on 9 Apr 1621.[4]

Edward Hilton was granted freeman, by service, attested by Marie Hilton (widow), on 10 Aug 1621, admitted and sworn to the Fishmonger's Guild. Edward Hilton and Thomas Roberts are listed as "in New England" in the 1641 Fishmongers tax roll of London.[5][6]

Edward Hilton and Thomas Roberts are the top Fishmongers on the "List of Emigrant Liverymen of London, in 1641". They are noted as "in New England", before Henry Watts and William Dyer.[7]

Charles Hilton household

In a record from "Boyds Inhabitants of London", the family of Charles Hilton includes mention of Edward and Paul, made freeman in 1621 (by service) and freeman in 1619 (by patrimony), respectively. Also noted on the opposite leaf, "Edward Hilton FISH 1641 poll tax New England".[8]

Mythical Descent

As for the spurious royal descent, see "Genealogical Dictionary of Maine and New Hampshire" (p. 133) which says,

"The American Hiltons, like the Drakes and the Webbers, have been victims of a ?missing heir--estate in Chancery' fraud. The legend went that the last Baron Hilton (of co. Durham),[9] had d. a bachelor and that, as his two brothers, William and Edward, had emigrated, the estate was in Chancery. About 1885 Nathan Hilton, a magistrate of Yarmouth. N. S., collected a fund and hired ?a woman in London to search the matter out' (letter of Capt. B. R. Hilton. 1924). This woman, identity unkn., in order to connect the co. Durham family with the two brothers in London and America, must have invented probate records of two estates, ?Ralph Hilton, 1602,' and ?Roger Hilton, 1619.' Exhaustive searches by Mr. Hassam (1873-4), Col. Banks (1924) and the best professional Col. Banks knew, employed by him when he returned to America, failed to find any trace of ?Ralph' and ?Roger.' They did, however, find over thirty contemp. records supporting the origin of the American emigrant brothers in Northwich, co. Chester. The baronial pedigree was pub. in the Yarmouth Herald, Mar. 22-29, Apr. 5-12, 1898, and will doubtless charm the credulous for years to come."

Miscellaneous. A prior verion of this profile included, "A bio note from "MA Bay Settlers," referencing MA Bay Settlers, "Mr. Edward Hilton Born x 5 Jun 1596; Died wp 6 Mar 1670/71; English Origin Northwich, Cheshire; London; Came to New England 1628; Resided in Dover, ME; Freeman of MBC; Occupation fish merchant; First Spouse Katherine SHAPLEIGH (widow Treworgy) (1600 - 1676); Children Edward, William, Sobriety, Susanna, Samuel, Charles; Second Spouse Frances _____ (c1618 - p1688); Children Mannering, Agnes, William (Oops. This same second wife and children are also given to brother William at the site.)"

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Robert Charles Anderson, The Great Migration Begins: Immigrants to New England 1620-1633, I-III, 3 vols., paginated continuously (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1995), 947-951 (Edward Hilton) at 949; digital images by subscription, AmericanAncestors.
  2. England, Cheshire Parish Registers, 1538-2000 https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:S3HT-XX63-QFJ?i=37
  3. From Vickie Elam White, Genforum: These brothers were sons of William Hilton of Northwich, Cheshire. Anderson, II:947-57 has excellent biographical sketches of these men.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Sybil Noyes, Charles Thornton Libby and Water Goodwin Davis, Genealogical Dictionary of Maine and New Hampshire (Portland, Maine, Southworth Press [originally in 5 parts, paginated consecutively], 1928-1938; rpt, Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2012), 331-332 (1-Edward Hilton); digital images, InternetArchive (borrow).
  5. Fredric Z. Saunders. "The Roberts Family of Woolstone". See esp. footnote 23 (items 1-4), which cites source documents of the Fishmonger's Guild at Guildhall Library London, Aldermanbury, London. (Link via the Wayback Machine, capture date 26 Nov 2018) https://web.archive.org/web/20181126150136/http://home.netcom.com/~fzsaund/roberts.html
  6. Jeanie Roberts, "Thomas Roberts of Woolaston, Gloucester and Dover, New Hampshire 1600-1673," The Family Connection, blog post of 5 January 2013; web content, jeaniesgenealogy.com (Accessed 18 Apr 2023) https://www.jeaniesgenealogy.com/2013/01/thomas-roberts-of-woolaston-gloucester.html
  7. Waters, H. F. (Henry Fitz-Gilbert)., New England Historic Genealogical Society. The New England historical and genealogical register. [Boston, etc.: New England Historic Genealogical Society, etc.]. p.199. (Accessed 26 Apr 2023) HathiTrust
  8. Boyd's Inhabitants of London. [24106] Edward Hilton (Accessed 25 April 2023)
  9. Note that there were only 2 Baron Hiltons (by writ). The last was Alexander Hilton (d. 1361), 2nd Baron Hilton, who m.1 Eleanor Felton (mother of Robert c. 1339 - 1376); and m.2 Maud Emeldon. His descendants were not peers.
    Of possible interest ... Robert Hilton (under age in 1637), master mariner, perhaps the son of Henry Hilton, gent. of South Shields, DUR, is the ancester of Ralph (bp. 20 Mar 1710), son of the sailor Henry Hilton of Hilton Castle (bp. 23 Jun 1661 South Shields, Durham) and Sarah Clarke. Ralph might be the same person as Cpt. Ralph Hilton of Long Island, New York and afterwards, Jamaica.
    Cpt. Ralph Hilton m. Mehatabel, dau. of Daniel Lawrence, gent. of Flushing, Queens, NY (will: 14 Mar 1755; proved: 18 Aug 1757).

See also--

  • Bell, C.H. (1889). History of the Town of Exeter, New Hampshire, pp. 27. Astor Place, NY: J.J. Little & Co. Googe Books.
  • Fitts, J.H. (1912). History of Newfields, New Hampshire, 1638-1911. Archive.org
  • "History of Dover, New Hampshire: containing historical, genealogical and industrial data of its early settlers, their struggle," (2005). Ancestry.com.
  • Libby, C.T. (n.d.). Genealogical Dictionary of Maine and New Hampshire, III, p. 331. PDF.
  • "New England Marriages to 1700," (2008). NEHGS, AmericanAncestors.org.
    • data for both marriages; see edition: "New England Marriages Prior to 1700," (2015). NEHGS, 2, p. 760. Boston, MA.
  • Scales, J. (1919). "Hilton, Edward, 1595 - 1671," in Piscataqua pioneers, 1623-1775, pp. 108-111. Archive.org.
  • Wilbur D Spencer. “Pioneers on Maine Rivers”, Genealogical Publishing Company Inc, Baltimore. 1973. pp.42, 50, 59, 65, 68, 74-75, 83-84, 104-105, 111, 112, 113, 135, 174, 394. https://archive.org/details/pioneersonmainer00spen/page/42/mode/1up
  • Find A Grave: Memorial #40767648 (Accesssed 18 Apr 2023)
  • Wheelwright Deed (1629)




Is Edward your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Edward by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 34

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
I'm sorry I'm late to the story, but why were they merged IF they don't represent the same person?
posted by Jack Wise
It was just one of those confusing autmoted messages generated because a unmerged match was removed before the merge could go forward.
posted by M Cole
Hilton-1341 and Hilton-52 do not represent the same person because: They need to be merged.
posted by Murray Maloney
Why did you reject the merge if they need to be merged?
posted by Gill Whitehouse
Though I see they've been merged now.
posted by Gill Whitehouse
Hilton-1341 merge had previously been rejected by someone else.

Maybe I don't understand how to move a rejection back into the Merge column.

In any case. We now have one less stray duplicate version of Edward Hilton.

posted by Murray Maloney
One of the mysteries of WikiTree :)
posted by Gill Whitehouse
Hope to establish a path forward for collaborating about the Boyd's Inhabitants of London" referring to an Edward Hilton 1641 fishmongers poll tax record, devised by further notations to suggest he may have had father Charles Hilton (wife Mary), and brother Paul."

Courtesy of Ann Browning and Murray Maloney, I have seen the Boyd's record, later compiled/apparent card index type entry.

On the left leaf is entry is about "Edward Hilton, FISH 1641 poll tax New England." Right leaf has separate and/or expanded entry headed Charles Hilton "1590," seems a number 24106. This Charles Hilton is "citizen & fishmonger ... Com Scy Index I 3/5 wife Mary orphans 4." Immediately below appears,

? Edward ... free 1621 by service
? Paul ... free 1619 by patrimony

This record and any related work also impacts on WikiTree's William Hilton Sr (abt.1590-bef.1656) (now linked as Edward Hilton's brother; both are sons of WikiTree's William Hilton of Witton (abt.1550-bef.1605) and Ellen (Mainwaring) Hilton (1562-1606).

Perhaps one or more space pages would better support what could be on-going research about this item. There would likely be bits of only possibly related research we'd want to capture. No doubt this involves accessing both New England and old England records across multiple platforms, including multiple subscription sites.

Any takers?--Gene

Reference--Murray Maloney, "Re: Thomas Roberts to G2G," email to GeneJ of 25 April 2023, citing "Boyd's Inhabitants of London," courtesy of Ann Browning; personal email archive.

posted by GeneJ X
I have found various records leading me to believe that Charles Hilton was originally from Davenham, near Northwich. There are 3 things that lead me to believe that Edward and William may be his sons.

Arthur Hilton who left in a Will appears to have been born in Davenham but father is John who is a brother of Charles I believe as both of their father’s names is George.

Charles wife was Mary and a Mary Hilton widow is mentioned in the Fishmongers’ records to do with Edward Hilton’s freedom I think - I may be misremembering the exact details.

Charles appears to have had a son William there is a baptism record for a William Hilton with father Charles at Davenham. William may be a half brother as Arthur and William seem to be much older than Edward so their mother may have died and Charles remarried.

Unfortunately Charles must have been very sick when he wrote his will as it is very brief and children are not named.

Of course Hilton is not an uncommon name so Charles Hilton may be from somewhere else entirely

My gut feeling which could be very wrong is that Edward is a son of Charles Hilton not William.

Ann

posted by Ann Browning
As above, still hoping we might use space pages to document the various thought and opinion. --Gene

Edited to add: I would expect that creating bibliographic notes about the vast number of New England records would be part of this work.

posted by GeneJ X
edited by GeneJ X
My view on this figure begins with the ubiquitous claim that Edward Hilton was a member of the Fishmongers Company. The Edward Hilton, fishmonger, son of Charles Hilton-5018 of St Botolph's, Fishmonger of London, is the only known figure who fits this description. The records of the Hilton family show numerous combinations of William and Edward as father/son/father, but none of these are known to be Fishmongers. Further, the date of Edward's apprenticeship in the Company, 1615, works out to a birthdate of 1600 - later than the 1596 of this profile. This age is significant. Unfortunately, if Charles Hilton was of St Botolph's Billingsgate (where the fish were), the records of that church were destroyed in the 1666 Fire.

There is no proof that this Edward had a brother William Hilton. This relationship has been claimed by most genealogies, but there is no contemporary record of it. William Hilton-18 had a brother Edward, but nothing links that Edward to the Fishmongers. It appears the two have been conflated.

Charles Hilton-5009 of Cheshire, also had sons William, Edward and Richard, but the relationship of these to the rest of the family is not established. Research on the profiles of the Charles Hiltons of Cheshire and of London is ongoing. Unless this brings up more yet-undiscovered facts, my view is that Edward Hilton the Fishmonger, the immigrant of this profile, was the son of Charles Hilton-5018.

posted by Lois (Hacker) Tilton
Lois, if I may, a couple of points of ambiguity...

1) We do not have birth records of Paul and Edward, we only have a record indicating that they were members of that household after the death of Charles. Paul was freeman in 1619 by paternity, and Edward in 1621 by service; why? An implication of this is that the Edward at Charles home, after his death, is his nephew Edward Hilton of Northwich, son of William of Witton. This is theory a that you brought to our attention.

2) Your 2nd paragraph is hard to parse. The first sentence "no proof that this Edward had a brother William". The third sentence "Hilton-18 had a brother Edward". This comment is in the profile of Edward, brother of Hilton-18. So, when I change my assumptions, then the second sentence is saying that there are no records that London fishmonger Charles, father of Edward, had son William. The truth is that there are no records that London Charles had a son named Edward, only a school admission record for son Paul. But there are records that Cheshire Charles Hilton had sons William and Edward.

3) The household record of Charles Hilton of London indicates that wife Marie left with 4 orphans. Charles Hilton of Cheshire is named on birth records of four children. I have not ruled out Charles Hilton-5009 being the same person as Charles Hilton-5018. In which case, Charles would have sons Edward and William, diminishing the credibility of the "Edward as nephew theory". If only we could find Edward Hilton's apprenticeship record.

posted by Murray Maloney
The fishmongers records are fairly vital to this. I am hoping that they can be accessed at a FHC if not the Fishmonger’s’ archivist may have records, if not either of those it would mean a trip to the Guildhall where all the records may be deposited..

This may be a lengthy process we are all conjecturing at the moment. However the fact that Edward had a son Charles and a daughter Susannah (we found a burial record for a Susannah daughter of Charles) seems to point to the emigrant being the son of Charles. Ann

posted by Ann Browning
Murray - I believe that William of Witton and Cheshire Charles had sons William and Edward - from the parish records - but that Edward is not the same as Fishmonger Edward, whom I believe to be the son of Fishmonger Charles. Two names keep repeating in this family - William and Edward, which is a recipe for conflation. That's what I think has happened.

I believe the Boyds record is evidence that Fishmonger Edward was a son of Charles, but not conclusive evidence. I think Boyds would have listed him as "apprentice" if he were not. They way they do those lists is for children. Servants, forex, would not be there.

We now have Mary Bradbent as Charles' wife, and her brother's Will confirming it - still working on this - but it adds 3 daughters to the mix. I will be adding this profile sometime today. I don't believe we're ready to merge the 2 Edward profiles yet, but I still have confidence that H-5013 is the immigrant Fishmonger.

posted by Lois (Hacker) Tilton
On the basis of your recent work, I have changed the Research Notes about the two Charles Hiltons; I agree that they are different people and families. Really great work on Mary Bradbent, her son Paul Hilton, and her three Hilton daughters: Elizabeth, Lydia, and Rachel. We now have four orphans, excluding Edward. I am now even more confident that Edward of Northwich was the adopted son (formally or informally) of Charles of London. Charles home would serve as his pied-a-terre in London while he set out to conquer the new world, or at least a small patch of New England.
posted by Murray Maloney
edited by Murray Maloney
There are certainly issues with Edward, which will probably not be resolved unless we find his apprentice record from the Fishmongers. However, I am still convinced that there is no evidence showing him as a brother of William and that the claims to that effect are likely to be conflation, arising from the usual duplication of names.
posted by Lois (Hacker) Tilton
Hmmm... The profiles of William and Edward, show that they were sons of William of Witton. That is, William of Witton had sons William and Edward. We are still trying to figure out whether that Edward is the fishmonger, which I think he is. But that doesn't change the fact that this Edward, whether he is the fishmonger or not, is a brother William.
posted by Murray Maloney
Hi Lois,

As I read the the extended notes for that poll tax record of 1641, from the right side of the film, it looked to me as though the genealogical suggestions were prefaced by a question mark.

Do you read those extended notes in the same way? --Gene

posted by GeneJ X
edited by GeneJ X
Gene, I think that poll tax thing needs its context. This tax was passed after the BIshops Wars, when King Charles needed money to pay off the Scots and make them go back home. Every members of the Livery Companies was assessed a given amount, depending on rank. The companies needed to prove that everyone had paid - unless they were out of the country or dead, etc. That's what the list was about - not genealogy.
posted by Lois (Hacker) Tilton
Hoping all of us with an interest in the ancestry of Edward Hilton and/or William Hilton might review in some detail the lengthy entries about the two men in Genealogical Dictionary of Maine and New Hampshire; as well, the introductory comments for the surname.

Reference--

  • Sybil Noyes, Charles Thornton Libby and Water Goodwin Davis, Genealogical Dictionary of Maine and New Hampshire (Portland, Maine, Southworth Press [originally in 5 parts, paginated consecutively], 1928-1938; rpt, Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2012), 331-332 (1-Edward Hilton); digital images, InternetArchive (borrow).
  • Sybil Noyes, Charles Thornton Libby and Water Goodwin Davis, Genealogical Dictionary of Maine and New Hampshire (Portland, Maine, Southworth Press [originally in 5 parts, paginated consecutively], 1928-1938; rpt, Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2012), 334-335 (17-William Hilton); digital images, InternetArchive (borrow).
posted by GeneJ X
edited by GeneJ X
Gene - this is a secondary or tertiary work, which has been cut-and-pasted into a myriad of genealogies. It also relies on Hubbard, who has been claimed to be unreliable. We know this is what all the genealogy books say about this family. The issue here is whether this much-propagated information is correct, based on the primary sources. All the books claim that Edward and William Hilton were brothers, but no one can cite proof of this claim. We know that William Hilton had a brother Edward, but we don't know if that Edward became a member of the Fishmongers' Company and went to America. Or if Edward the Fishmonger was the son of Charles Hilton the Fishmonger. Was there one Edward, or were there two?

My point is - we have seen no primary, contemporary sources to indicate that William and Edward were brothers. All the claims to this effect appear to be conjectural, based on the conflation of names. Did William leave a Will naming Edward as his brother? Did William's son call Edward "the petitioner's brother" or the unrelated "Mr Edward Hilton?" Why would he not claim the relationship? In letters to Winthrop, does either Hilton refer to the other as his brother? This is the sort of evidence we should be looking for.

posted by Lois (Hacker) Tilton
I appreciate that your opinion of those authors and that work differs markedly from my own. I realize that it can take some work to trace the entries back to the original historical sources. --Gene

Edited to add: "... it can take some work, but it is generally worth it.

Edited to add: You wrote, "It also relies on Hubbard ..." As I read the entries, the authors refute Hubbard. See the particular quote from GDMNH 334 (William), in Anderson's comments at p. 950 (Edward), "[t]he historian Hubbard cared little about the eastern country, and his paragraph about the founding of N.H. ... is mostly false."

posted by GeneJ X
edited by GeneJ X
It's good that they can be critical. Too many times, these authors simply and uncritically copy each other. But when we have cases like this one, it's necessary to go deeper and trace the claims back to the original historical sources. One author, clinging to the hypothesis that William Hilton was a Fishmonger, decided that Charles Hilton's son Paul must actually be William. Ann Browning managed to find the Wills of family members that made it very clear Paul Hilton was actually Paul. I hope to get a find like that to confirm, one way or the other, who Edward Hilton actually was.
posted by Lois (Hacker) Tilton
I think a space page would be helpful.

Ann

posted by Ann Browning
Thanks, Ann.

I created one as Hilton Research 2023, It's possible we may need more.

Gave it a very basic outline, including one section, "Theories of Parentage." It does have a sources section, so inline citations/reference notes will report.

posted by GeneJ X
Recently Ann Browning discovered another Edward Hilton, son of Charles Hilton. There are indications that he is the London Fishmonger, made freeman in 1621 and who is in New England in 1641. He and brothers William and Richard were christened at Devenham, Cheshire.
posted by Murray Maloney
edited by Murray Maloney
Murray et al, I think most of the extended Hilton Family were members of the London Fish Mongers Guild. When it's a lucrative trade, why not bring in the rest of the family? After all William Hilton & Ellen Mainwaring mined Salt from their pitch, a necessity in preserving/creating Salted Cod!
posted by Jack Hilton
Quite right, Jack. We're actually trying to keep track of which ones were Fishmongers by using the London Fishmongers category. Unfortunately, we don't have access to many of their records from that period.

What can you tell us about Hilton brothers salt business? I understand that it was downriver from Hilton's Point, closer to the mouth of the river.

posted by Murray Maloney
The wills tell us they were husbandman or yeomen mostly. The only ref I have found to salt is one for a George Hilton of Davenham in 1559. Details here:

http://catalogue.cheshirearchives.org.uk/calmview/Record.aspx?src=CalmView.Catalog&id=DLT%2f2%2f2%2f16%2f1%2f1&pos=37

Ann

posted by Ann Browning
Inserted into notes: LINK is to Image of actual page in the church register. Edward was christened 9 June 1596 at Witton-cum-Twambrooks, Cheshire, England, son of William Hilton. England, Cheshire Parish Registers, 1538-2000 https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:S3HT-XX63-QFJ?i=37
posted by Beryl Meehan
Dating looks similar to Edward (bp. 09 Jun 1596 Witton-cum-Twambrooks, Cheshire), son of William Hilton, (see WikiTree Space page - Hiltons of Lancashire and Cheshire)
posted by [Living Ogle]
It is, baptised at Witton.

Ann

posted by Ann Browning