Hopestill Holley, daughter of Joseph Holley and Rose Allen, was born about 1646 in Sandwich, Barnstable County, MA.[1]
Marriage
Hopestill was married to Samuel Worden,[1][2] likely at Yarmouth, before May 1665 when she was named as the wife of Samuel Worden in the division of her father's estate.[3] They had children:
↑ Worden, O. N.. Some records of persons by the name of Worden : particularly of over one thousand of the ancestors, kin and descendants of John and Elizabeth Worden, of Washington County, Rhode Island : covering three hundred years and comprising twelve generations in America. Lewisburg, Pa.: Printed at the Railway Press of J.R. Cornelius, 1868. pg 34
↑ Records of the Colony of New Plymouth in New England, Court Orders, v4 (1661-1668) edited by Nathaniel B. Shurtleff & printed in 1855 by William White of Boston, MA; p87-88
↑ Transcribed by Coralynn Brown. Stonington, New London Co., CT, Vital Records from Barbour, 1668-1852 - Whittlesey-Wyman[1]
↑ Find A Grave, database and images (accessed 23 March 2020), memorial page for Hopestill Holley Worden (1646–13 Sep 1715), Find A Grave: Memorial #13347101, citing Wequetequock Burial Ground, Stonington, New London County, Connecticut, USA ; Maintained by Laurie C. (contributor 46771573).
Lineages of Members of the National Society of Sons and Daughters of the Pilgrims, Vol. III$
Is Hopestill your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Hopestill by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Hopestill:
Holloway-1654 and Elliot-1898 appear to represent the same person because: There is no credible proof that she was a widow of Elliot, therefore, the profiles should be merged.
Holloway-1962 and Holloway-1654 appear to represent the same person because: Same name, same parents, same husband, same child, estimated birth dates within one year