no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Katherine (Hopkins) Dye (abt. 1673)

Katherine Dye formerly Hopkins
Born about in Richmond County, Virginia Colony, British Americamap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 1693 in Richmond County, Virginiamap
Descendants descendants
Died [date unknown] in Lunenburg Parish, Richmond County, Virginia Colony, British Americamap [uncertain]
Profile last modified | Created 1 Aug 2011
This page has been accessed 1,569 times.

Biography

There is no record showing the name of the wife of Arthur Dye, but the available evidence indicates that she was a daughter of Robert Hopkins, Sr. Her name is often given as Katherine (Catherine), which comes from a misreading of the will of her brother George Hopkins. As indicated in other records, George had sisters named Jane and Katherine, either of whom could have been the wife of Arthur Dye. The evidence indicating that Arthur Dye's wife was a daughter of Robert Hopkins, Sr. is as follows:

1. The godfather of Arthur Dye's son Avery Dye was Avery Naylor, the third husband of Katherine (Fauntleroy?). Katherine's first husband (and the father of her children) was Robert Hopkins, Sr.

2. Arthur Dye owned a plot of land together with Robert Hopkins, Jr. (son of Robert, Sr.). Such an arrangement strongly suggests a family connection, quite likely a wedding gift to Arthur from the Hopkins family.

3. Arthur's grandson Fauntleroy Dye named a son Martin Hopkins Dye, suggesting both Hopkins and Fauntleroy in the Dye family's ancestry. (There are only two spots in Fauntleroy Dye's family tree where the name Fauntleroy could appear, and one of them is with Katherine, wife of Robert Hopkins -- see below.)

4. Robert Hopkins, Sr. had a son George Hopkins who in 1685 deeded cattle to his sisters Jane and Katherine. One of these sisters is the presumed wife of Arthur Dye.

5. Later in life, George Hopkins married Frances (Newman) (McMillion) (Wilson), who was the mother-in-law of Arthur Dye's son Avery. (Avery Dye married Katherine MacMelion.) George Hopkins' will mentioned Catherine Dye as wife of Avery Dye and daughter of George's wife Frances.

6. Just to make things more confusing: After George Hopkins' mother Katherine (Fauntleroy?) (Hopkins) (Naylor) died, Avery Naylor married Patience (Newman) Ford, the sister of George Hopkins' wife Frances (Newman) (Mackmellion) (Wilson) Hopkins.

7. The resultant misunderstanding of the relationships of the people mentioned in George Hopkins's will has led to widespread confusion about the given names of Arthur and Avery Dye, with many internet family trees showing the name "Arthur Avery Dye" for both father and son. This appears to be based on the false conclusion that in his will George Hopkins meant to say "Arthur" instead of "Avery" Dye as the husband of his wife's daughter Catherine. This confusion has led to the inaccurate presumption that Arthur Dye's wife's name was named Catherine. We don't know the name of Arthur Dye's wife!

6. Avery Naylor, god-father of Avery Dye, lived on land called "Naylor's Hole", which bordered a deep spot (or hole) in the river where ships could dock. This land was half of a tract (the other half was owned by Robert Hopkins, Jr.) which had been originally patented by immigrant 'Moore Fauntleroy (who gave up the patent right). The land adjoined Fauntleroy land, and a Fauntleroy descendant later bought all this land back from the Hopkins heirs and the heirs of Avery Naylor's third wife.[1] This leads to the supposition that the maiden name of Robert Hopkins' wife Katherine was Fauntleroy, which would make her the likely daughter of immigrant George Fauntleroy, younger brother of Col. Moore Fauntleroy, about whom nothing more is known after brother Moore transported him to Virginia in 1643.[2][3][4] Robert and Katherine Hopkins did indeed name a son George and Avery Dye Sr. and Catherine Mackmillion named their youngest son Fauntleroy.

Sources

  1. See Chris Kraft's Fauntleroy research.
  2. Harrison Dwight Cavanagh, Colonial Chesapeake Families, vol. 1, p. 192.
  3. Terry Mason's Family History Site, citing The Virginia History Magazine, vol. 1, p. 4.
  4. The Fauntleroy Family, by Mary Emily Fauntleroy.

Acknowledgements

  • WikiTree profile Hopkins-1428 created through the import of Dulaney, Kelley Family Tree.ged on Aug 1, 2011 by Christina Marshall.
  • WikiTree profile Hopkins-1550 created through the import of Descendants of John Smith.GED on Aug 22, 2011 by Jeff Smith.
  • Hopkins-3803 was created by Dawn Griffis through the import of Griffis Ragland Alsford Wrighton Family Tree_2014-01-29.ged on Jan 29, 2014.




Is Katherine your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Katherine by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Katherine:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 12

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Hopkins-2921 and Hopkins-1428 appear to represent the same person because: Katherine (Hopkins) Dye is all the info in Hopkins-2921, which matches Hopkins-1428 & should be merged into it. Please merge. Thanks!
posted by Liz (Noland) Shifflett
Hopkins-2280 and Hopkins-1428 appear to represent the same person because: same person, same husband, same parents
posted by [Living Schmeeckle]
I will be cleaning up the multiple mothers of Katherine Dye, per discussion on her father's G2G page at http://www.wikitree.com/g2g/203617/robert-hopkins-and-the-many-catherines-katherines
posted by [Living Schmeeckle]
I will be cleaning up the multiple mothers of Katherine Dye, per discussion on her father's G2G page at http://www.wikitree.com/g2g/203617/robert-hopkins-and-the-many-catherines-katherines
posted by [Living Schmeeckle]
Given her birth & death dates, I believe she should be merged with Sandford-47. Her parents should be John & Unknown (Scopes) Sanford, and her husband should be Robert Hopkins-1429.
She has the exact same birth date and date of death as her mother, and she is 21 years older than her husband.
Hopkins-1428 and Hopkins-2280 do not represent the same person because: years to far apart, not sure the one with earlier dayts isn't a totally wrong one.
posted by Dawn (Alsford) Griffis
Hopkins-1428 and Hopkins-2347 appear to represent the same person because: Merging down duplicates of the same person with the same husband to the lowest numbered profile.
posted by Tim Brooks
Hopkins-1428 and Hopkins-2280 appear to represent the same person because: Merging down multiple duplicates of the same person with the same husband
posted by Tim Brooks
All of the profiles for Catherine/Kathryn Hopkins will need to be merged into Hopkins-1428 because it is the lowest-numbered profile.

I've rejected any merges into this profile because of this.

H  >  Hopkins  |  D  >  Dye  >  Katherine (Hopkins) Dye