Henry Isham is the second great grandfather of Thomas Jefferson, 3rd President of the United States of America (see text) and in a badged trail to seven Magna Carta surety barons (see text).
Captain Henry Isham was the son of William Isham of Little Harrowden, Northamptonshire and Mary Brett. He was born in 1627/8, presumably in Northamotnshire.[1][2]
Virginia
Henry went to Virginia in about 1656, settling in Bermuda Hundred, Henrico County.[1][2]
Anne Isham, married Francis Eppes[1][2][7] (wrongly called Elizabeth by by W G Stannard in a 1916 article;[4] named as Anne in both her brother Henry's 1678 will[5][6]) and her mother's will (see her mother's profile for a transcript)
Henry's uncle Sir Edward Brett (who had been knighted by Charles I for military service[8]), in his December 1682 will, left "£200 apiece to the two daughters of his nephew Henry Isham, late of Virginia, deceased, by Katherine his wife."[9]
Death
Henry died in Bermuda Hundred, Henrico County, Virginia before 11 September 1677. His wife survived him, dying in 1686.[1][2]
Presidential Lineage
Henry Isham is the second great grandfather of Thomas Jefferson, 3rd President of the United States of America[10]
3. Thomas Jefferson is the son of Jane (Randolph) Jefferson bp. St. Paul’s Church, Shadwell, London 20 Feb. 1720-Monticello 31 Mar. 1776.[10]
6. Jane Randolph Jefferson is the daughter of Isham Randolph Turkey Island, Henrico Co. Jan. 1685-Dungenss, Goochland Co. Nov. 1742, White Chapel, London c. 1718.[10]
26. Mary (Isham) Randolph is the daughter of Henry Isham Sr., prob. Pytchley, Northamptonshire c. 1628-prob. Bermuda Hundred, Henrico Co., Va. c. 1675, c. 1659.[10]
Research Notes
Disambiguation
The Henry of this profile should not be confused with a Captain Henry Isham of Charles II's Royal Navy referred to in entries dated 1660-1662 in the diary of Samuel Pepys.[11]
A Henry Isham married Elizabeth Brian, widow at All Hallows the Less, London on 23 March 1649. There is no evidence that this was the Henry of this profile. This Henry may be, or be connected with, a Henry Isham, recorded, with a John Isham, as a London merchant in June 1636.[12]
In 1665 a Henry Isham, not the Henry of this profile, was given a lease of tithes in Derbyshire.[13]
Previously-attached Daughter
Phoebe (Isham) Belcher was previously attached as a daughter, but there is no evidence for this - and no reliable evidence has been found for her last name at birth being Isham. The will of Henry's son Henry, referred to above, indicates there were two daughters, Mary and Anne, and the will of Henry's uncle Sir Edward Brett, also referred to above, confirms there were only two daughters.
↑ 1.01.11.21.31.41.51.6 Douglas Richardson. Magna Carta Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 4 vols, ed. Kimball G. Everingham, 2nd edition (Salt Lake City: the author, 2011), Vol. II, p. 462, ISHAM 16, Google Books
↑ 2.02.12.22.32.42.52.6 Douglas Richardson. Royal Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 5 vols, ed. Kimball G. Everingham (Salt Lake City: the author, 2013), Vol. III, p. 404, ISHAM 20
↑ 4.04.14.2 Stannard, W G. "Brett-Isham-Randolph," in The William and Mary Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 2 (Oct., 1916), pp. 132-133, Hathi Trust
↑ 5.05.15.2 Lathrop Withington. Virginia Gleanings in England in Virginia Magazine of History and Biography, Vol. 18, 1916, pp. 85-86, Internet Archive
↑ Annie Lash Jester and Martha Woodroof Hidden. Adventurers of Purse and Person, Order of First Families of Virginia, 1956, pp. 163-164, Familysearch
↑ Philip Alexander Bruce. ''Social Life of Virginia in the Seventeenth Century, 1907 (1964 reissue by Frederick Ungar Publishing Company, ), pp. 62-63, Internet Archive]
↑Original Letters, in The William and Mary Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 2 (Oct., 1892), pp. 99-109 (Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture; DOI: 10.2307/1939798). Stable URL
↑ 10.010.110.210.310.4 Roberts, Gary Boyd. Ancestors of American Presidents. 2009 Edition. New England Historic Genealogical Society. Boston, Massachusetts.
↑ Diary of Samuel Pepys, entries dated 1660-1662, listed - with links to the entries - here (accessed 7 April 2024)
↑ 'Charles I - volume 327: June 20-30, 1636', in Calendar of State Papers Domestic: Charles I, 1636-7, (London, 1867) pp. 1-38, British History Online (entry for 24 June 1636), accessed 4 April 2024
↑ 'Charles II - volume 118: April 12-22, 1665', in Calendar of State Papers Domestic: Charles II, 1664-5, (London, 1863) pp. 305-325, [1] (entries for 13 April 1665), accessed 6 April 2024
See also:
Brainard, Homer Worthington . A Survey of the Ishams in England and America, Tuttle Publishing Company, 1938, p. 50, Internet Archive (available on 1-hour renewable loan)
Roberts, Gary Boyd. Ancestors of American Presidents, New England Historic Genealogical Society (Boston, Massachusetts), 2009
Stannard, W G. "Brett-Isham-Randolph," in The William and Mary Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 2 (Oct., 1916), pp. 132-133, Hathi Trust
Torrence, William Clayton. Henrico County, Virginia: Beginnings of its Families, in The William and Mary Quarterly, Vol. 24, 1915, pp. 206 and 209, Internet Archive
I have removed an image of a noticeboard about Bermuda Hundred for copyright reasons: the webpage from which the image came has a clear copyright notice dated 2010.
You don't say what the webpage was, which is now lost. The thumbnail image can be seen, for now, at https://www.wikitree.com/photo/jpg/Isham-12-1 (since it is no longer attached to any WikiTree page, only the original poster can see details & the image will be deleted from WikiTree after a certain time period).
The photo was copyright and had a prominent copyright notice on the webpage from which it was copied. It was of the noticeboard, which says nothing that is specific to Henry Isham.
That image was not under any copyright. It is not possible to copyright such an image - no matter what notice was placed on the web page. This is what is known as copyfraud and is itself illegal.
There is a volunteer-run national US database of historical markers: HMDB. This states that copyright of photos is shared between the photographer and the website. See question 19 here: https://www.hmdb.org/faq.asp. This includes "If you find your image used elsewhere without attribution, or used commercially, check with us first to make sure we did not grant permission for commercial use, then please proceed to vigorously defend your work.". As you will see if you go to the site's copyright page, the site allows non-commercial use provided that a minimum credit is given to the site and the photographer: https://www.hmdb.org/copyright.asp.
It is clear that others believe that images of historic markers can be copyright.
Isham-346 and Isham-12 appear to represent the same person because: They are born in the same year, and two of the daughters should be merged as well as Wife Katherine Banks
Thanks, Scott. For now I am rejecting this merge, I am afraid. There appears to be a muddle around Isham-346. The biography of Isham-346's currently shown wife suggests that her husband should be called George, not Henry. The daughters shown for Isham-346 do not correspond to the daughters of the Henry of this profile, one of whom is a great-grandmother of US President Thomas Jefferson. I believe that before any merge can be considered, it is necessary to sort out this muddle. Otherwise there is a real risk of creating worse confusion on WikiTree.
To add that, if you look at the profile of Mary (Isham) Sims, shown as daughter of Isham-346, she was previously attached as a daughter of Katherine Banks, but was detached in 2015. See Robin Lee's comment of 7 December 2015. If the currently shown birth year for Mary (Isham) Sims is anything like right, she cannot be daughter of Katherine Banks, who was about 62 at the time, and cannot be the same as Mary (Isham) Randolph, daughter of the Henry of this profile.
Isham-346 and Isham-12 do not represent the same person because: Different family relationships. Daughters do not correspond. Isham-346's bio says he was called George not Henry. These issues need to be resolved before any merge can be considered.
I believe Henry Isham had a daughter named Phoebe. Who's to say that Katherine didn't want anything to do with a child from an earlier marriage.
Of course she wouldn't want any of his property to go to Phoebe. I think we have to take human nature into account here. Henry may have dis-owned
her because of who she married. I'm going to accept Phoebe until there is positive proof one way or the other.
'
I am afraid no good evidence has been found for Henry having a daughter called Phoebe. Because of this, a Phoebe Isham, https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Isham-190, was removed as a daughter in 2016. That Phoebe's profile lacks any good sourcing.
Capt. Henry Isham had a first wife before Katherine. Her name was Elizabeth
Anne Bryant Born 1628. They were Married in 1649 London Metropolitan Archives; London, England; Reference Number: P69/ALH8/A/001/MS05160/001.
They had two children: 1. Gideon 1650 2. Phoebe 1653.
Elizabeth died shortly after in 1654. Therefore Phoebe and Gideon would be the step children and perhaps not listed under Katherine Banks children.
Thanks for mentioning the marriage record. It can be found on Ancestry at https://www.ancestry.co.uk/discoveryui-content/view/4874135:1624?tid=&pid=&queryId=2a41a184-d7d9-40ac-a33c-5f26e7edbfca&_phsrc=JZf1&_phstart=successSource, with an accompanying image of the parish register which shows that a Henry Isham married Elizabeth Brian widow on 23 March 1649 at All Hallows the Less, London. So Brian was not her last name at birth - it was a married name from a previous marriage - and she would not have been the Elizabeth, daughter of a Thomas Bryant, baptised in 1629. There was at least one other Captain Henry Isham, and there may well have been other Henry Ishams who were not captains. There is no evidence that the Henry referred to was the Henry of this profile.
Pepys' diary for the years 1660-2 refers to a different Captain Henry Isham being then in London: he was a captain in the British Royal Navy. There is a list of entries at https://www.pepysdiary.com/encyclopedia/546/#references.
No reliable evidence has been found so far for the family origins, or last name at birth, of the Phoebe who married George Belcher. Suggestions in some family trees on the web that she was an Isham by birth, and daughter of the Henry of this profile, lack good sourcing and should not be relied on. Please see Phoebe's profile for wills which suggest that she was not a daughter of Henry.
Nor has any reliable evidence been found so far for Henry having a son called Gideon. Several trees on the web refer, without sourcing, to a Gideon/Gidea Ison/Isom/Isham/Isam, usually said to be born in Shropshire, England and to have died in 1701, sometimes given the unevidenced prefix Sir, with several given him a second forename, George: again, these trees should not be trusted. (And there is no evidence for anyone of this name being knighted.) One book, which lacks clear sourcing, says that a Gideon Isham was born in Shropshire in about 1635 and moved to Virginia, with nothing known of his family origins: Edward Paul Isham, An index of the Ishams in England and America. 1984, p.567, Internet Archive. If this is accurate, a Gideon born in 1635 cannot be the son of the Henry of this profile.
I will edit the research notes on this, and Phoebe's, profiles.
The children of Capt. Henry and Katherine Isham were Henry II (d. 1678), Anne Elizabeth (1665-1718), and Mary Royall (1658/60-December 29, 1735).
Henry Isham II died at sea without having been married. Anne Elizabeth Isham married Col. Francis Epes. Mary Royall Isham was born at Bermuda Hundred, Henrico County, Virginia and died at Turkey Island in Henrico County. She married Col. William Randolph I.
Thanks for drawing attention to this. Pity this webpage lacks clear sourcing for particular statements it includes, and just gives a general source list.
This profile is on the long list of profiles managed by the Magna Carta Project that need attention.
bio had shown marriage as 1656, Henrico County, Virginia[citation needed] - based on text in with Katherine's bio, given under the heading "An American Great Grandmother: Katherine Banks," by scottbthompsonsr, The Courier Herald Dublin
A marriage date for Henry and Katherine of 1658/9 was added, citing as source "International Marriage Records, 1560-1900", which is not considered a reliable source.
Aug 26, 2017 - Yates Publishing. U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900: [database online] (not considered a reliable source). (Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2004).
Verified this profile as being on a project-approved trail (from Isham-12 to Albini-39 & Ros-162), but have marked several profiles along that trail as in need of re-review. The project account for the Magna Carta Project will be added as a manager later this month to meet WikiTree guidelines (see Help:Project-Managed_Profiles). Give me a holler if you have any questions. ~ Liz, Magna Carta project member
I am not accepting Gideon either. The only children between Henry Isham and (Elizabeth) Katherine Banks are 1) Mary Isham; 2) Anne Isham; and 3) Henry Isham, Jr. We have to adhere strictly with the record set out by Douglas Richardson in his work, "Royal Ancestry." I just happened to miss the additional child, as I recently was in the hospital.
You are accepting Gideon but not Phoebe? How do you know Henry didn't have a first wife, Elizabeth, in England? I descend from Anne Eppes and I am getting DNA matches with Phoebe. And a granddaughter named Jane Clayton by an Isham daughter. Any ideas?
I believe the "noticeboard" was Historic Marker K 202, which can be viewed here: https://www.chesterfield.gov/ImageRepository/Document?documentId=29237 (from this Government website - US Government offices do not/cannot hold copyright).
See also the pdf of the paperwork for the Historic District designation of the Town of Bermuda Hundred.
edited by Michael Cayley
The Virginia Department of Historic Resources maintains a website for Historical Markers in the State, including an image for the display board for Bermuda Hundred which is similar to the one Liz gave the link for. You can find it via this search page if you input "Bermuda Hundred": https://vcris.dhr.virginia.gov/HistoricMarkers/ The Department says that "Data contained anywhere on this website is Copyright © of Department of Historic Resources" and requires users to agree to this: https://vcris.dhr.virginia.gov/HistoricMarkers/Account/Logon
There is a volunteer-run national US database of historical markers: HMDB. This states that copyright of photos is shared between the photographer and the website. See question 19 here: https://www.hmdb.org/faq.asp. This includes "If you find your image used elsewhere without attribution, or used commercially, check with us first to make sure we did not grant permission for commercial use, then please proceed to vigorously defend your work.". As you will see if you go to the site's copyright page, the site allows non-commercial use provided that a minimum credit is given to the site and the photographer: https://www.hmdb.org/copyright.asp.
It is clear that others believe that images of historic markers can be copyright.
edited by Michael Cayley
edited by Michael Cayley
edited by Michael Cayley
Of course she wouldn't want any of his property to go to Phoebe. I think we have to take human nature into account here. Henry may have dis-owned her because of who she married. I'm going to accept Phoebe until there is positive proof one way or the other. '
edited by Michael Cayley
Anne Bryant Born 1628. They were Married in 1649 London Metropolitan Archives; London, England; Reference Number: P69/ALH8/A/001/MS05160/001. They had two children: 1. Gideon 1650 2. Phoebe 1653. Elizabeth died shortly after in 1654. Therefore Phoebe and Gideon would be the step children and perhaps not listed under Katherine Banks children.
England Births and Christenings, 1538-1975", database, <Ref.> (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:J3VP-24Q : 3 February 2023), Thomas Bryant in entry for Elizabeth Bryant, 1629. <Ref>
Pepys' diary for the years 1660-2 refers to a different Captain Henry Isham being then in London: he was a captain in the British Royal Navy. There is a list of entries at https://www.pepysdiary.com/encyclopedia/546/#references.
No reliable evidence has been found so far for the family origins, or last name at birth, of the Phoebe who married George Belcher. Suggestions in some family trees on the web that she was an Isham by birth, and daughter of the Henry of this profile, lack good sourcing and should not be relied on. Please see Phoebe's profile for wills which suggest that she was not a daughter of Henry.
Nor has any reliable evidence been found so far for Henry having a son called Gideon. Several trees on the web refer, without sourcing, to a Gideon/Gidea Ison/Isom/Isham/Isam, usually said to be born in Shropshire, England and to have died in 1701, sometimes given the unevidenced prefix Sir, with several given him a second forename, George: again, these trees should not be trusted. (And there is no evidence for anyone of this name being knighted.) One book, which lacks clear sourcing, says that a Gideon Isham was born in Shropshire in about 1635 and moved to Virginia, with nothing known of his family origins: Edward Paul Isham, An index of the Ishams in England and America. 1984, p.567, Internet Archive. If this is accurate, a Gideon born in 1635 cannot be the son of the Henry of this profile.
I will edit the research notes on this, and Phoebe's, profiles.
[corrected for typos]
edited by Michael Cayley
The children of Capt. Henry and Katherine Isham were Henry II (d. 1678), Anne Elizabeth (1665-1718), and Mary Royall (1658/60-December 29, 1735).
Henry Isham II died at sea without having been married. Anne Elizabeth Isham married Col. Francis Epes. Mary Royall Isham was born at Bermuda Hundred, Henrico County, Virginia and died at Turkey Island in Henrico County. She married Col. William Randolph I.
edited by Andrea (Stawski) Pack
This profile is on the long list of profiles managed by the Magna Carta Project that need attention.
edited by Michael Cayley
edited by Adella Brown
1670-02-01 Henrico County, Virginia, USA
From We Relate (accessed 24 Feb 2018):
Aug 26, 2017 - Yates Publishing. U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900: [database online] (not considered a reliable source). (Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2004).