no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Thomas Kinne (abt. 1578)

Sir Thomas Kinne aka Kinnie, Kenney, Keeny
Born about in Kings Lynn, Norfolk, Englandmap
Ancestors ancestors
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married 1593 in Dunstan West, Englandmap
Descendants descendants
Died [date unknown] [location unknown]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Rhonda Scoullar private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 11 Feb 2011
This page has been accessed 11,602 times.
Research suggests that this person may never have existed. See the text for details.

Biography

Warning!!!: there is no evidence of the existence of Sir Thomas Kinne/Keney. A review of sources related to him point to the likelihood that he was a fictional person made up by a genealogist long ago.

  • There is no record of such a baronet or a coat of arms.
  • There is no record of such a man in Kings Lynn, Norfolk, England, nor as son of previously claimed John Kinne and Margaret Goodspeed
  • There is no proof of a descendancy from Baron John De Kenne, cited in the Doomesdy Book as a landholder and Lord in Somerset County.
  • There is no proof of a 1590s era marriage to Elizabeth Howard or Ann Howard Geary
  • There is no proof he fled to Holland.
  • There is no record of such a man in New London, Connecticut
  • There are no records to indicate that he was twice married, the second marriage to a Jane (who died before 1661).
  • There is no proof that he was a brother of William Kinne (1601-1675), who married Agnes Annie.
  • There are no records of two sons, John (1600) and William (1602).

For more information, see the G2G discussion mentioned above.

Sources




This profile lacks source information. Please add sources that support the facts.




Is Thomas your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Thomas's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 7

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
This profile suggests that the information contained is erroneous or wrong. . . .


View Tree Sex Male Birth about 1572 Of King's Lynn, Norfolk, England1 MARRIAGES (1) Spouse Mrs. Thomas /Kinne/ Marriage about 1593 Of King's Lynn, Norfolk, England SOURCES (1) Ordinance Index (TM) Family History Library :

Title Ordinance Index (TM) Author The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints publisher 25 Jan 2000 Edition Repository Family History Library

The Genealogists at The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saint double, triple and quadruple check all data before its added to their registry.

It is for each person to make up their own mind the validity of each given profile or posting of long dead people where the only records are possibly family bibles or a brief note in history.

In stating that this person "May Not Exist" you have successfully "KILLED" 17 plus Known Generations plus each generations siblings of someone's ancestors and 97 Living descendants in 13 known different family lines not counting the unknown family lines. I do not know about some amature genealogists but this amature genealogist would think long and hard before I declared "Research suggests that this person may never have existed" simply because of how many of someone's ancestors I would be declaring NULL and VOID and essentially killing off all of the descendants.....As stated above "It is for each person to make up their own mind the validity of each given profile or posting of long dead people where the only records are possibly family bibles or a brief note in history." If you check and find, double check different references and find, then triple check with different references and all data is corresponds then the data MAY be correct. It is YOUR decision to use that data or not.

posted by Michael Braden
edited by Michael Braden
Kinne-38 and Kinne-104 appear to represent the same person because: All data in both profiles is the same please merge them to remove duplicated information.
posted by Michael Braden
Kinne-80 and Kinne-38 appear to represent the same person because: Writing to request a merge of Thomas Kinne-38, and Thomas Kinne-80. Same vital information in both profiles.

Thank you!

Kinne-104 and Kinne-145 appear to represent the same person because:

Writing to request a merge. Same vital information in both Thomas Kinne-104 and Thomas Kinne-145. Please mege the two profiles.

Thank you!

Kinne-104 and Kinne-80 are not ready to be merged because: Debate over Thomas's existence still to be resolved.
posted by Rhonda Scoullar
Kinne-104 and Kinne-80 appear to represent the same person because: dates/places same
Kinne-90 and Kinne-80 appear to represent the same person because: Thanks
posted by Eugene Quigley