↑ Profile created by Robbin Knapp through the import of knapp.ged on Sep 19, 2017. This comment and citation should be deleted after a short biography has been added and primary sources have been cited.
North America, Family Histories, 1500-2000 for Caleb Knapp
Birth of son Nehemiah listing parents Caleb Knapp and Sarah: "Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F74S-2LD : 7 January 2020), Nehemiah Knapp, 1714.
Acknowledgements
Thank you to Katharine E for creating WikiTree profile Knapp-962 through the import of adam smith.ged on Feb 3, 2013.
-
Is Caleb your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Caleb by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:
Anonymous, I'm reviewing children's births because I found discrepancies regarding children's names for another Caleb Knapp, (one of Stamford), and wife Hannah. (that profile includes names not found in my search, so I thought they might be from your Caleb's family.) I'm on the wait list for your Nicholas Knapp genealogy source.
In the meantime, I found some discrepancies when I looked in the Barbour Collection records for Greenwich. Charles 2 shows b. 24 Feb 1700, not 1705. Just a typo?
Charles 4 shows b. 15 July 1705, not 22 Feb.
Nathaniel b. 21 Feb. 1700, not 1700/1.
Abigail is not shown in Barbour.
Timothy shows b. 27 Jan. 1717/8. I assume 1718/8 is a typo. I didn't want to make corrections without giving you the opportunity to review first.
In the meantime, I found some discrepancies when I looked in the Barbour Collection records for Greenwich. Charles 2 shows b. 24 Feb 1700, not 1705. Just a typo? Charles 4 shows b. 15 July 1705, not 22 Feb. Nathaniel b. 21 Feb. 1700, not 1700/1. Abigail is not shown in Barbour. Timothy shows b. 27 Jan. 1717/8. I assume 1718/8 is a typo. I didn't want to make corrections without giving you the opportunity to review first.