↑ "Find A Grave Index," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:Q24M-PD93 : 19 September 2016), Sarah Elizabeth Knight Harding, ; Burial, Waterford, New London, Connecticut, United States of America, Mullen HIll Cemetery; citing record ID 166925275, Find a Grave, http://www.findagrave.com.
Is Sarah your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Sarah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Sarah:
Sarah Knight-63 was born in 1685. Her listed father, Richard Knight died in 1680, so this is an impossible parentage. He needs to be disconnected and she needs to be connected to Jonathan Knight-449. That would make Richard Knight her grandfather. Then she can be merged with Knight-159. That will help us untangle some of these Harding family lines.
Sorry! A mistake that is commonly made because of the way certain records are written. 1685 is more likely her marriage date, not birth date. This mistake is rectified.
Sarah Knight-63 was born in 1685. Richard Knight died in 1680, so this is an impossible parentage. He needs to be disconnected and she needs to be connected to Jonathan Knight-449. That would make Richard Knight her grandfather. Then she can be merged with Knight-159.
Sarah Knight-63 was born in 1685. Richard Knight died in 1680, so this is an impossible parentage. He needs to be disconnected and she needs to be connected to Jonathan Knight-449. That would make Richard Knight her grandfather. Then she can be merged with Knight-159.