Joseph Knox Sr.
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Joseph Knox Sr. (abt. 1747 - 1835)

Joseph Knox Sr.
Born about in Lancaster, Pennsylvaniamap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Husband of — married 2 Mar 1773 in Rowan, North Carolinamap
Husband of — married 8 Feb 1797 in Mecklenburg, North Carolina, United Statesmap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 87 in Rutherford, Tennessee, United Statesmap
Profile last modified | Created 18 Mar 2011
This page has been accessed 3,497 times.
1776 Project
Private Joseph Knox Sr. served with Rowan County Regiment, North Carolina Militia during the American Revolution.

Contents

Biography

Birth

Birth: Dec 1747 in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania or Bladen County, North Carolina Death: Aug 31, 1835, Rutherford County, Tennessee (alternate Wilson County) Parents: John Absalom Knox and Jean Sinclair (Gracy) Knox

Spouses

  • Magdalen (Allison) Knox, married Mar 2, 1773 in Rowan County, North Carolina
  • Elizabeth (Whiteside) Knox, married Feb 8, 1797 in North Carolina
  • Jean (Crockett) Knox, married Sep 13, 1809 in Wilson County, Tennessee


Residence

Joseph was living in the area of the Fourth Creek Congregation in Rowan County, North Carolina in 1771. This area became Iredell County in 1778, where he was living in 1790 and 1800.

Military Service

Revolutionary War Service NORTH CAROLINA Record: 1780, a Private under Capt. James Crawford, then under Capt. James Hall, then under Capt. Galbraith Falls. 1781, a Private under Capt. William McAdoo. All service under Col. Francis Locke.

Death

Death: Aug 31, 1835, Rutherford County, Tennessee (alternate Wilson County)

Sources


  • Source: The Knox Family by Hattie Goodman.
  • Source: DAR-grs|A067106|Joseph Knox|Feb 17, 2018
  • J.D. Lewis,
  • Source: Document: Tax List - 1779 [NC State Archives]; Call Number: C.R. 085.701.5; Page Number: 54; Family Number: 13
  • Source: Original data: State of North Carolina. An Index to Marriage Bonds Filed in the North Carolina State Archives. Raleigh, NC, USA: North Carolina Division of Archives and History, 1977.
  • Source: Original data: Tennessee State Marriages, 1780-2002. Nashville, TN, USA: Tennessee State Library and Archives. Microfilm.
  • Source: "United States Census, 1790," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XH2M-9DZ : accessed 23 October 2018), Joseph Knox, Iredell, North Carolina, United States; citing p. 390, NARA microfilm publication M637, (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.), roll 7; FHL microfilm 568,147.
  • Source: "United States Census, 1800," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XHR8-R9P : accessed 23 October 2018), Joseph Knox, Salisbury, Iredell, North Carolina, United States; citing p. 649, NARA microfilm publication M32, (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.), roll 29; FHL microfilm 337,905.
  • Source: "United States Census, 1830," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XH5W-4D8 : 7 September 2017), Joseph Knox, Rutherford, Tennessee, United States; citing 265, NARA microfilm publication M19, (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.), roll 179; FHL microfilm 24,537. Joseph Knox, age 80-90
  • Source: "North Carolina, County Marriages, 1762-1979 ," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:Q2R1-F9RT : 11 March 2018), Joseph Knox and Eliz. Whiteside, 08 Feb 1797; citing North Carolina, United States, p. , Office of Archives and History, Division of Archives and Records. State Archive of North Carolina and various county Register of Deeds; FHL microfilm 422,158.
  • Source: "North Carolina, County Marriages, 1762-1979 ," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XFSK-94J : 3 November 2017), Joseph Knox and Magdelen Allison, 02 Mar 1773; citing Rowan, North Carolina, United States, p. , Office of Archives and History, Division of Archives and Records. State Archive of North Carolina and various county Register of Deeds; FHL microfilm 500,949.




Is Joseph your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Joseph by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree: It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Joseph:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 10

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Jean Gracy was NOT his mother! The children listed as children of Jean Gracy Knox is all wrong! This error comes from Hattie Goodman's book which has been proven to be WRONG based on DNA analysis. She had a son Joseph but not the Joseph born 1747... her Joseph Knox was born 1738, so not the same Joseph Knox!

Hattie Goodman's book has my line ALL wrong.... it is sad how her "Book" is used for the basis of so many books that are the actual Historical Accounts of of other counties (in both NC and TN).

I have extensively researched, from primary source documentation, the Knox family of Rowan NC as well as the Knox line of Mecklenburg NC/York SC and the Knox line of Chester/York South Carolina [as they are all intertwined in error on online trees and on Find A Grave] and sadly I have found that Hattie Goodman even has HER OWN KNOX LINE wrong in her book.

If she is wrong on her own Knox line then why do so many people use her book as a basis of their Knox line? Because PRINT HAS POWER and once it is in print, lineages get destroyed.

Hattie uses the memorial in the Thyatira Presbyterian Church cemetery, that states John Knox and Jean Gracy had "seven sons", as if the memorial marker backs up her conclusions BUT what Hattie fails to mention [when mentioning the cemetery marker that backs up her claims] is that she and her sister placed the marker themselves... just left that little tidbit out.

The John Knox that married Jean Gracy was married TWICE. First to Jean Witherspoon and second to Jean Gracy but all the sons get lumped under Jean Gracy due to Hattie Goodman's book. I am not sure that is really her maiden name.... her will is "Jean Knox" but there is zero primary source documentation that says anywhere that she is a Gracy.

Hattie Goodman assumed every older male Knox buried in Thyatira was a son of John Knox & Jean Gracy but DNA has disproven this!

Jean Gracy Knox names her FOUR SONS in her will so the other children are either a son of John Knox and Jean Witherspoon or not related to this John Knox line at all. See the Knox DNA site for affirmation of this https://www.familytreedna.com/public/knoxsurname?iframe=ycolorized

posted by Tina Wells
edited by Tina Wells
Knox-5346 and Knox-184 appear to represent the same person because: same birth and death, lack of primary sources to determine place of birth
posted by Robin Lee
Knox-184 and Knox-5346 are not ready to be merged because: Birth Rowan County, NC

KNOX family record book Hattie Goodman 1905 Mother Jean Gracy(spelling from book).

posted on Knox-5346 (merged) by Alice (Knox) Johnson
Knox-184 and Knox-5346 appear to represent the same person because: same name and family
posted on Knox-5346 (merged) by Patricia Roche
DAR records :place of death :Rutherford County TN.
posted by Anne Langley
DAR records show birthplace as Lancaster, PA
posted by Anne Langley
Knox-818 and Knox-184 appear to represent the same person because: these are duplicates with different guesses in their assertions. We are not to hold up merges over unsourced assertions, therefore these profiles should be merged, and alternate interpretations discussed in the biography.
posted by Daphne Maddox
Neither profile has any decent evidence for the dates or birth place, thus these assertions should be removed or otherwise considered non-blockers for the purposes of deduplication.
posted by Daphne Maddox
Knox-818 and Knox-184 are not ready to be merged because: Birth date and place different. Needs more research
posted by Mary Knox
Knox-818 and Knox-184 appear to represent the same person because: Same parents and same spouses.