NOTE: Some claim that William III de Lancaster and Agnes de Brus had NO ISSUE.[3] If this is to prevail over Scots Peerage, there is still an issue with parentage as that source claims Hawise married a second time to Peter de Bruce-1130 and had Alice and another daughter Sarot. Currently, Bruce-1130 is married to a Hawice Lancaster-77 who is the daughter of Hawise Lancaster-105 Anderson-23510 15:22, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
↑Paul, James Balfour. "The Scots Peerage : founded on Wood's ed. of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland; containing an historical and genealogical account of the nobility of that kingdom", Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1906, Vol. III, Archive.org,
p.4
↑
Chetham Society, (1898). Remains, Historical and Literary, Connected with the Palatine Counties of Lancaster and Chester. pp.307. Cheshire. Google Books.
Bonjour. Qui sont les parents d'Alicia Lancaster de Lindsay (Lancaster-214) ? Au début, c'est: "Fille de Gilbert FitzReinfrid et Hawise (Lancaster) de Lancaster" (Lancaster-105). Puis, on voit: "Alicia était la fille de William de Lancaster, seigneur de Kendal, et d'Agnès de Brus"
It appears that this Alicia m. to William Lindsay-1584, has been confused with Alice Lancaster (renamed to Avice on WikiTree as the references to her used that name) who was m. to William Lindsay-1969 (uncle to Lindsay-1584), but possibly she is meant to be the same woman and should be disconnected from the uncle and merged with this profile.
There is another issue, however, in that Scots Peerage claims one set of parents for Alice/Alicia but Chetham claims another (see research notes)
The parents connected here are allegedly for Avice rather than Alice ('allegedly' as there are no reliable sources for Avice). Scots Peerage, OTOH, claims the parents are William Lancaster-456 and Agnes de Bruce-1131. [N.B. several profiles have claimed, without source, that this couple had no issue.] SP also shows just one child.
OK, main changes needed so far were simply removing from children from Alice. Many of them had, as fathers, DIFFERENT Williams from the same Lindsay tree. Maybe handy to look at http://www.wikitree.com/genealogy/Lindsay-Descendants-1973 Crawford and Craigie were two different lines.
Lancaster-214 and Lancaster-1934 appear to represent the same person because: Hi Folks, I think these are meant to be the same person. Obviously a bit of confusion to be sorted out including date and place of birth but same husband !!
Lancaster-1934 and Lindsay-331 appear to represent the same person because: same spouse, had child by 1205, source for Avice Lancaster, same time frame, same location.
Merci et bonne journée
edited by Jacques Labrecque
There is another issue, however, in that Scots Peerage claims one set of parents for Alice/Alicia but Chetham claims another (see research notes)
The parents connected here are allegedly for Avice rather than Alice ('allegedly' as there are no reliable sources for Avice). Scots Peerage, OTOH, claims the parents are William Lancaster-456 and Agnes de Bruce-1131. [N.B. several profiles have claimed, without source, that this couple had no issue.] SP also shows just one child.
https://archive.org/stream/scotspeeragefoun03pauluoft#page/6/mode/2up might help.