no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Margaret (Langdon) Combs (abt. 1780 - abt. 1860)

Margaret Combs formerly Langdon
Born about in Hempstead, Queens, New York, United Statesmap
Daughter of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married 6 Jun 1800 in Rockville Center, New Yorkmap
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 80 [location unknown]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Diane Matthews private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 22 Aug 2014
This page has been accessed 330 times.
The Birth Date is a rough estimate. See the text for details.

Biography

Margaret was born perhaps around 1780.

Research Notes

The name of the wife of Samuel Combs was given by William A. Eardeley. He collected vast amounts of source material on various Long Island families. One of these was compiled into a loosely organized collection running over 200 pages just on the Combs family. The first pages of that collection include a genealogical summary of the first generations of the family, mostly without indicating any source material that was used to construct the tree. The tree contains Samuel's father Noah Combs and a listing of his children. That listing states son was born 1779 and married Margaret Landon, but provided no further information.[1]

Sources

  1. "Combes, Combs, Comes, Coomes genealogy", unpublished manuscript at Queens Borough Public LIbrary, microfilm available at Family History Centers and affiliate libraries.




Is Margaret your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Margaret by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. Mitochondrial DNA test-takers in the direct maternal line: It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Margaret:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 9

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Message me at [email address removed] p>I think My Harmon Langdon is related. Check out our GEDMatch. PW2193998 Between 3&5.6 cMs at 60-2000 SNPs we are all over the place. Checking at 5cM/60-2000 SNP we have 2 and it implies 7.2 Generations Back...which would be about right.

(Apparently we are related 14 Generations back on other lines...so That might be some of the littler ones)

posted by Merriam Langdon
edited by Merriam Langdon
I support this merge. My notes (from Combs cousin Clarence Ike) have the spelling as "Samuel Combs". I think that the spelling differences are relatively minor. I don't believe that the village of Rockville Center existed in 1780, so the birth would be Hempstead, Queens, New York. Thanks Kay!
posted by Diane Matthews
Langdon-1660 and Langdon-845 appear to represent the same person because: These two profiles are for the same person. Please add your sources and discuss with the other profile manager what should be saved and what should be changed. Then complete the merge. Thanks!
posted by Kay (Johnson) Wilson
To Diane and Kay: I will go along with the spelling of COMBS, but I do not go along with the misspelling of SAMMUEL. You won't find anything much with misspellings, yet I already find much with COMBS/COOMBS, as they ARE linked to each other's spellings, which is a good thing, but that first name could really present a problem. (and even though I won't make a bit of contention with the last name, I DO with the first. I also present here the work of Olive Branch Millburn, and our part of the family has always maintained the spelling of COOMBS)

Diane - are you a descendant? I would love to have email correspondence regarding the COOMBS/COMBS family, as it was ONCE regarded a link to the Mayflower passenger list for passenger Degory Priest. His daughter Sarah married a JOHN COOMBS in London, and then they moved here to America.

SO... the Mayflower Society USED TO accept Samuel Coombs/Combs as a descendant. He is my 3x great grandfather.

HOWEVER, at some point, they discovered a broken link, and even IF Samuel is RELATED to John Coombs/Combs, it is not a direct link, SO... the Mayflower Society published silver books on each passenger, and I bought the one regarding Degory Priest. It says right smack dab in the middle that there is no correlation with Degory between him and Samuel. Now I have cousins mad at ME for finding that out, and I would like to touch base with someone who is researching and discuss it.

Would you be willing? Please say yes! And we can go on from there. Is there a Coombs/Combs society still going? Being one of the first families in Colonial America, I would love to find out. I did find one that even says they were doing a DNA study, but I have written them to no avail. The last time someone was active was several years back. This looks like a really good society, and I am wondering if there is a better website that has been updated to contact them (and see that both surname spellings ARE accepted, it's just that with Samuel, I have only seen the COOMBS spelling with regard to HIM. But this is the link to the society, which notes BOTH SPELLINGS): http://www.combs-families.org/combs/

My own objection really is from the fact the name is misspelled for Samuel, and in doing research I know how hard it is to get past a misspelling. Is there some way to correct that first name? It can reek havoc, and that isn't a good thing. It doesn't matter if someone in the Coombs line changed the spelling for themselves, it's just that it WAS "COOMBS" for "SAMUEL".

Please note here regarding the historic account of THE SHIP BROOKLYN, where the SON of Samuel Coombs was a passenger. His name was Abraham, and he was PASSENGER #41. https://www.maritimeheritage.org/passengers/br073146.htm

Abraham is my 2x great grandfather.

My other source is: THE HISTORY DIARY AND GENEALOGY OF WILLIAM HENRY BRANCH SR by Olive Branch Millburn. This is now found in the Salt Lake City Family History Library, and used to be found online. However, it has now been taken OFF line. It was published in the fall of 1952, and presented to the Salt Lake City library in 1953.

I have a pdf version, which I tried to link here, but it only brought you back to my own email link. However, if you do get the book, and as you go through it, you will see the MAYFLOWER connection with "direct lineages" on PAGE 95. (now has been debunked). Diane, I would love to compare what you have to the "uncited" notes here regarding the COOMBS/COMBS line, so please let's email

(this link is to the various forms of obtaining the book from Worldcat: https://www.worldcat.org/title/history-diary-and-genealogy-of-william-henry-branch-sr/oclc/13755635/editions?referer=di&editionsView=true)

You will see the family genealogy that was done by Olive's research up to that time, and you will see ME as "Belle Antonette Pace" on page 88. (earlier you will see my great grandmother's picture, the daughter of Abraham Coombs, and grand daughter of Samuel. Her name was ELLA COOMBS)

And as you can also see, Olive Branch Millburn's work lists HEMPSTEAD as the place of origin on PAGE 96 under the MAYFLOWER DESCENDANT heading.


Thank you, and I welcome email correspondence!

Bella (I changed the spelling of my first name here, but it is legal as BELLE on other documents. And, yes, I DO have trouble! - lol! )

I am sorry that this is about MARGARET LANGDON, and the person in question is her husband SAMUEL. But we should get all our ducks in a row! And, yes, MARGARET is the same person.

posted by [Living Pace]
edited by [Living Pace]
Yes, I agree that the correct name is Samuel Combs. I have his uncle also being "Samuel". It must be a typo on my part. I descend from Noah Combs on my Abrams line, and from his brother Nathaniel Combs on my Combs line. I understand the John Combs/ Degory/Sarah Priest issue, but I don't have any answers. My email is (diane dot r dot matthews at gmail dot com).
posted by Diane Matthews
Thank you. I will send you more information via email. I, too, have a gmail address. I am also undergoing chemo, so some days my days are not so good energy wise. I WILL respond!!! that is a PROMISE!!! I just think it will have to wait a few days. SO... please fix the typos on Samuel, and I agree to merge the two Margarets. Have a good day!
posted by [Living Pace]
Langdon-1660 and Langdon-845 are not ready to be merged because: I have the work of the family genealogist, Olive Branch Millburn, who left her work behind, and it was verified at the time. She passed away in 1963. I can see where the husband, Samuel COOMBS for my record, is known as SAMMUEL COMBS for the other. I prefer Olive Branch's work to stand as it is. The record for SAMMUEL COMBS (which I think is a misspelling of the first name), is from the person's own record who created that profile. Olive Branch was a certified genealogist, and I have no reason to believe another person has "better" information, or the "correct name spelling" which, to me, is wrong. I need to go back and cite Olive Branch as my source, and I am letting it stand as is.
posted by [Living Pace]
Bella, These are obviously profiles for the same two people. No one is saying that one profile or the other is "better" or "correct". If they're both for the same people the duplicates need to be merged. That's part of what we agree to on WikiTree when we sign the Honor Code. We agree to collaborate with others. If you believe the spelling should be Coombs, then say so. Write to the profile manager for the other two profiles, Diane Matthews, and explain what you would like to have show up on the final two profiles. It might be that it's just fine with her.

You're right that it would be a good idea for you to put your sources in supporting your position. As it stands, neither one of you has added any sources for either of the couple. Leaving them in limbo, as unmerged matches, is not okay. I've proposed each of the two merges again. You and Diane have 30 days to agree on what the final profiles should look like before they will default to allow anyone else to complete the merges. That should give the two of you time to work it out. Please let me know if I can do anything to help. Kay

posted by Kay (Johnson) Wilson
Langdon-1660 and Langdon-845 appear to represent the same person because: Please agree to merge these duplicate profiles. Thanks!
posted by Kay (Johnson) Wilson

L  >  Langdon  |  C  >  Combs  >  Margaret (Langdon) Combs

Categories: Estimated Birth Date