no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Lucretia Latimer (1773 - 1774)

Lucretia Latimer
Born in New London, New London, Connecticutmap
Ancestors ancestors
[spouse(s) unknown]
[children unknown]
Died at age 0 in Connecticutmap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: David Schaeffer private message [send private message] and Richard Bivins private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 28 Jul 2011
This page has been accessed 472 times.

Contents

Biography

Lucretia Latimer died young.

Lucretia was born on 2 July 1773 in Montville, New London, Connecticut. She was the daughter of Jonathan Latimer Jr and Lucretia (Griswold) Latimer.[1]

Lucretia died at the age of 9 months on 4 April 1774 in Connecticut, USA.[1]

Research Notes

Sources with no fact or date

There are additional sources with no facts or date. Often these are sources for the baptism or marriage of children that mention the parents or father. This section can just be removed if you will be adding those children and using these sources there.[2]

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 Public Member Trees,
    Record for Militia Colonel Jonathan Latimer Jr +.
    Ancestry Profile (accessed before 12 July 2023).
  2. Ancestry Member Family Tree,
    Ancestry Profile.




Is Lucretia your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Lucretia by comparing test results with other carriers of her ancestors' mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Lucretia:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 4

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Latimer-726 and Latimer-120 appear to represent the same person because: Obvious match
posted by David Schaeffer
Latimer-726 and Latimer-120 do not represent the same person because: Richard - as I said before there are too many issues that need to be cleaned up prior to a merge...I can do this later when I have more time. I would prefer to clean up the file during the merge. The information for Latimer-120 has been verified by a number of sources and I believe it to be accurate. Allowing the merge to default in 30 days would not be my choice.
posted by David Schaeffer
Latimer-120 and Latimer-726 appear to represent the same person because: David, can't do it so go ahead and merge. Same goes for:

Latimer-728 into Latimer-109 Latimer-729 into Latimer 127 Latimer-730 into Latimer-110

posted by Richard Bivins
Latimer-120 and Latimer-726 do not represent the same person because: other issues need to be fixed first, will do it later.
posted by David Schaeffer

L  >  Latimer  >  Lucretia Latimer