no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Thomas Leighton II (abt. 1642 - bef. 1677)

Thomas Leighton II aka Layton
Born about in Dover, Strafford, New Hampshiremap
Husband of — married 1670 in Dover, Strafford, New Hampshiremap
Husband of — married about 1675 in Dover, New Hampshiremap [uncertain]
Descendants descendants
Died before before about age 35 in Dover, Strafford, New Hampshiremap
Profile last modified | Created 8 Jul 2011
This page has been accessed 3,703 times.

Biography

Thomas Leighton was born to Thomas and Joanna (Silsby) Leighton in about 1642. He died 31 Oct. 1677[1] NOTE: This appears to be an error or transposition of the date by the book's author, because Thomas would have died before administration of his estate was granted on October 13, 1677.[2] A court order was filed on October 31, 1677 providing an increased allowance for Thomas' son, Thomas, then in Lieut. Anthony Nutter's care.[2] Another source reports just that he died at Dover, intestate in 1677. It also says his estate was inventoried 29 Oct. 1677, and that administration was granted to Elizabeth Layton, Philip Cromwell and John Tuttle 31 Oct 1677. On June 25, 1678, at the widow's request, Lt. Peter Coffin and Mr. Fryer were appointed additional administrators.[3]

On 13 Feb. 1670, the same day that his father deeded him a house and land, Hatevil Nutter deeded him a 40-acre lot between Oyster River and Back River (NHPD, 3:58); these deeds were probably marriage gifts. His drafting of a will six years before he died suggests his health had been poor.[3]

He took the freeman's oath 25 June 1672 (NHSP, 40:277), served as constable in 1673 (40:290) and as juryman in 1676. His estate was inventoried 29 Oct. 1677 at more than 515 pounds (NHPD, 5:20-26; NHSP, 31:186).[3]

When Hatevil Nutter made his will 24 Dec. 1674, he did not mention his daughter Elizabeth, indicating that she was then dead (NHSP 31:157-9). Julia Cornman made a conjecture that Thomas's second wife may have been born a Tuttle, perhaps because John Tuttle was a co-administrator of the estate.[3]

Thomas married first Elizabeth Nutter, born abt. 1646, married abt.1670, died before 24 Dec 1674.

Thomas and Elizabeth (Nutter) had the following known children:[2]

  1. Thomas, b. Dover NH., about 1671, d. Newington NH., about 1744
  2. John, b. Dover NH., about 1673, d. Dover NH., about 1718

Thomas married second Elizabeth (Unknown), after 1674.[2][4] Thomas and Elizabeth (Unknown) had one known child:

  1. Elizabeth, b. Dover NH., about 1676, d. 1756. married at Dover NH., RICHARD PINKHAM, born about 1672, son of John and Martha (Otis) Pinkham.

Sources

  1. "Hatevil Nutter of Dover NH and His Descendants", Boyle. Peter Randall Publisher, Portsmouth NH, 1997 Page 6
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Lineage of Reuben Leighton, Barrington, N.H. 1770 - Newbury, Vt. 1842; descendant of Thomas Leighton, Dover 1633, Compiled by Martha E. Leighton, reference Page 3
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 "A Leighton Genealogy: Descendants of Thomas Leighton of Dover N.H., Vol-1" Page-22. Perley M. Leighton. NEHGS, Boston 1989.
  4. Torrey's New England Marriages prior to 1700, (Online database. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2008.) Originally published as: New England Marriages Prior to 1700. Boston, Mass.: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2015. Reference Volume 2, page 931




Is Thomas your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Thomas by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 7

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Leighton-1130 and Leighton-286 appear to represent the same person because: They are the same person. a parallel chronology was created.
posted by Steve Honda Jr.
Leighton-1130 and Leighton-286 do not represent the same person because: Too many discrepancies to merge. Birthdates and birthplaces, death dates. The only 'possible' connection is the spouse's name. Without more documentation, I would reject this merge.
posted by Jerry Fuller
Leighton-1130 and Leighton-286 appear to represent the same person because: same man. The death date 1744 is actually that of his son Thomas b 1671
posted by Beryl Meehan
The merge of Leighton-775 into Leighton-286 should take place using vitals from Leighton-286 which are sourced and documented in the profile for -286
posted by S (Hill) Willson
The merge of Leighton-775 into Leighton-286 should take place using vitals from Leighton-286 which are sourced and documented in the profile.
posted by S (Hill) Willson
Leighton-775 and Leighton-286 appear to represent the same person because: Same name and parents.
posted by Jamie Nelson
Leighton-554 and Leighton-286 appear to represent the same person because: Same birth info, same parents, same death info. Spouse on-286 and children are correct, but I didn't add them to -554. Please merge.
posted by S (Hill) Willson

L  >  Leighton  >  Thomas Leighton II