Is Elizabeth your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Elizabeth by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Elizabeth:
Elizabeth was a very common name. It is likely that Mr. Lewis did have a daughter, Elizabeth, but does not mean she is the one who married Thomas Henderson in 1767, then Bennett Henderson a few years later. Thomas's wife bore him children until 1790.
Elizabeth was a very popular name then. Likely Mr. Lewis did have a daughter, Elizabeth. That does not mean that Elizabeth Lewis was who married Thomas Henderson.
I looked at the father's will mentioned above. It seems to be referring to an Elizabeth Lewis who was married to Bennett Henderson. Bennett was an executor of the father's will.
The Elizabeth (if her surname was Lewis) cannot be the same one who married Thomas Henderson. Those two were having children together in SC at least until 1790 when my ggg grandmother, Mary Henderson, was born. That convinces me that she is not the same one who married Bennett Henderson in 1771 after she married Thomas in 1767 in South Carolina. Thomas married her "out of unity" with his Quaker beliefs. Still he was allowed to remain in the group. I wonder if she might have died after Mary was born. In the 1800 census there is no woman of an age to be the mother in the family. There was one female of age 10-15 which could have been Mary..
The Elizabeth (if her surname was Lewis) cannot be the same one who married Thomas Henderson. Those two were having children together in SC at least until 1790 when my ggg grandmother, Mary Henderson, was born. That convinces me that she is not the same one who married Bennett Henderson in 1771 after she married Thomas in 1767 in South Carolina. Thomas married her "out of unity" with his Quaker beliefs. Still he was allowed to remain in the group. I wonder if she might have died after Mary was born. In the 1800 census there is no woman of an age to be the mother in the family. There was one female of age 10-15 which could have been Mary..
edited by -- (Whitsett) Benton Ph.D.