no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Sarah Ann (Lightfoot) Lott (1748 - 1818)

Sarah Ann (Sallie) Lott formerly Lightfoot
Born in Duplin, Province of North Carolinamap
Ancestors ancestors
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married about 1760 in Province of North Carolinamap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 70 in Telfair, Coffee County, Georgia, United Statesmap [uncertain]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Dale Gorham private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 12 Jul 2010
This page has been accessed 2,725 times.
This profile lacks source information. Please add sources that support the facts.

Contents

Biography

Sarah is mentioned in a 2012 Blog post from "The Family Snoop" which reads: “John Lott, Sr., my maternal 5th great-grandfather, was born c. 1740 in Edgecombe County, North Carolina. He was the son of John Lott and Unknown Spouse. He married Sarah "Sallie" Lightfoot c. 1760. Little is known about Sallie, including her date of birth or information on her parents and siblings. There has been a lot of speculation, but no concrete documentation.” [1]

Research Notes

The following reference is for a totally different person.

Name: Sarah Savin Lightfoot
Birth Date: 1750
Volume: 104
Page Number: 106
Reference: Gen. Column of the " Boston Transcript". 1906-1941.( The greatest single source of material for gen. Data for the N.E. area and for the period 1600-1800. Completely indexed in the Index.): 20 Jun 1921, 8954

The AGBI record for Sarah Savin Lightfoot 1780, references "Colonial Families of the Southern States," Stella Pickett Hardy, Tobias Wright Publisher, New York, 1911 p. 339, which states that this Sarah was the wife of a Philip Lightfoot born in 1784. Philip Lightfoot married Sallie S. Bernard, daughter of William and Fanny Bernard, granddaughter of William and Sarah (Savin) Bernard, in August of 1804 in Caroline County, VA (marriage record on Ancestry). They died and are buried in Port Royal, VA. (grave inscription transcript also on Ancestry, not from Find-a-Grave) [2]


A Sarah Lightfoot "Sally" Lott formerly Deshulto was removed as the mother of Luke to enable a merge. A pending merge is set but and further research is needed to ascertain if Sarah was indeed married earlier.

https://www.ancestry.com/mediaui-viewer/tree/29703165/person/12744347757/media/rhusa2007b_al3270-00201?_phsrc=uq11183389&_phstart=successSource Land Grant

Notes

Death place: Coffee County, Georgia. Coffee County was formed in 1854.


Sources

  1. https://thefamilysnoop.blogspot.com/2011/12/john-lott-iii.html?m=1
  2. Hardy, Stella. Colonial Families of the Southern States. Tobias Wright, publisher. New York, 1911. p. 339.




Is Sallie your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Sallie by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Sallie:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 7

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
This person did not marry any Lott.

In the biography this is listed as a reference:

Name: Sarah Savin Lightfoot Birth Date: 1750 Volume: 104 Page Number: 106 Reference: Gen. Column of the " Boston Transcript". 1906-1941.( The greatest single source of material for gen. Data for the N.E. area and for the period 1600-1800. Completely indexed in the Index.): 20 Jun 1921, 8954

But this is the full info: https://www.ancestry.com/discoveryui-content/view/347029:3599?ml_rpos=31&hovR=1

In the bio, this info is included: Name: Sarah Savin Lightfoot

      • Maiden Name: (Bernard)***

Gender: Female Birth Date: 1750-1759 Volume: 104 Page number: 106 Reference: Gen. Column of the " Boston Transcript". 1906-1941.( the Greatest Single Source of Material For Gen. Data For the N.e. Area and For the Period 1600-1800. Completely Indexed in the Index.): 20 Jun 1921, 8954

Maiden name Bernard was carefully left out.

Another link for the same person: https://www.ancestry.com/discoveryui-content/view/926547:3599?tid=&pid=&queryId=fbcef5fd7d3d514816b8f70eb064dead&_phsrc=YKc965&_phstart=successSource She's listed here as Sarah Savin Bernard. Obviously she married a Lightfoot, not a Lott.

This is another attempt by the Lott family to connect to the York County Lightfoots. WikiTree is full of nonsense from this quarter.

I'm a Lott, but suffering succotash. We're not related to the York Lightfoot family. Get over it. It's just a legend. I had to remove another bunch of nonsense from Martha Jane Lott's profile.

I'm not the only one who thinks so. This is from a 1999 email from Kathryn Odom Brown http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~jcbarron/genealogy/lott/lott99.htm

"About the John(3) m. to Sally ? Most that speak of this marriage are convinced she was Sally Lightfoot. An "author" who shall remain nameless even told me that he had proof and that she is buried in a cemetery in Telfair county, GA. Well that peaked my interest since I have a home in the next county. When I told him I would like to visit the grave he changed the subject and never gave me the location even though I repeatedly asked. He also said that none of John and Sally's children existed except Mark. He was an only child and that all the Lott's in MS had black blood in them. He said that there was no truth to the family rumor that she was a Cherokee from NC. She was from a very distinguished family from England and he had proof. I knew after our telephone conversation that I was dealing with someone who wasn't interested in the facts, rather, he was interested in painting a rosy picture for the clients who hired him to trace the line. And some people pay for this kind of info. I did go look at his book and was not impressed. I prefer to be entranced by the rich background of people who were not privileged and who had downs, as in Montgomery Co, Ga when Jesse Lott and his sons and brothers lost all they had at tax sells. Jesse then moving south in 1806. I adore crying over the still-births, the cavalrymen, the adventures who seem to drop down like manna with no history with them. There are few officers in all my lines, no money to speak of, some preachers some promiscuous. That's what gives us a story."

posted by Ed Blair III
edited by Ed Blair III
I think I've posted this before, but not sure where. There is no reference to Sarah Savin Lightfoot in the 20 June 1921 edition of the Boston Transcript Genealogy columns as stated in Ancestry citing the AGBI.

There is a second AGBI record for a Sarah Savin Lightfoot 1780, referencing "Colonial Families of the Southern States," Stella Pickett Hardy, Tobias Wright Publisher, New York, 1911 p. 339, which states that this Sarah was the wife of a Philip Lightfoot born in 1784. Philip Lightfoot married Sallie S. Bernard, daughter of William and Fanny Bernard, granddaughter of William and Sarah (Savin) Bernard, in August of 1804 in Caroline County, VA (marriage record on Ancestry). They died and are buried in Port Royal, VA. (grave inscription transcript also on Ancestry, not from Find-a-Grave)

and the following:

From https://thefamilysnoop.blogspot.com/2011/12/john-lott-iii.html?m=1 “John Lott, Sr., my maternal 5th great-grandfather, was born c. 1740 in Edgecombe County, North Carolina. He was the son of John Lott and Unknown Spouse. He married Sarah "Sallie" Lightfoot c. 1760. Little is known about Sallie, including her date of birth or information on her parents and siblings. There has been a lot of speculation, but no concrete documentation.”

posted by Kathie (Parks) Forbes
Sarah Savin appears to be a totally different person - Wikitree ID Sévigné-11 from Maryland married a Bernard, died in Virginia.
posted by Kathie (Parks) Forbes
Lightfoot-1328 and Lightfoot-7 appear to represent the same person because: same name, same dates, same husband, same son
posted by Michael Dolese
There was a John Lightfoot who died in 1751 with Mary Clack and had no issue.

This profile should show Thomas Lightfoot as the father of Sarah Sallie (Lightfoot) Savigne /Savin - Bernard as mentioned in the Phillip 3 estate papers which do not have permission to be reproduced in any form.

posted by [Living McClendon]
https://www.geni.com/projects/Lightfoot-Lott-Benge-Duncan-SNP-CIRCLE-STUDY-GROUP-Results-updated-as-the-circle-grows/48665 is leaning in the direction of Thomas Lightfoot, son of Phillip 3 as the dad of this Sarah, with segment triangulation at ch.2 in the 91-100 segment with overlying triangulation of many testers on the Lott descendancy list.
posted by [Living McClendon]
Deshulto-2 and Lightfoot-7 are not ready to be merged because: These are unlikely to be a match. But some of the details seem shared.See Lightfoot-7

Nothing about this profile is accurate. John Lightfoot and Mary Clack had no children. He died in 1751 and she married a man named Ruffin. ref an article from the William and Mary Quarterly, available on JSTOR: Excerpt:

“Issue of James and Mary Clack (1) Sterling Clack, clerk of Brunswick County, married Anne Eldridge, and had issue: James and Eldridge Clack, probably others. After his death in 1757, his widow, Anne, renounced the provisions of his will. (Brunswick County records.) (2) Mary, married I. John Lightfoot. No issue; II. Robert Ruffin, (marriage bond Sept. 6, 1751), …”

Sarah Savin Lightfoot, "documented" on the profile turns out to be a woman named Sarah Savin Bernard. I found a second AGBI record , referencing Colonial Families of the Southern States, published 1911. This book, on p. 339, states that this Sarah was the wife of a Philip Lightfoot born in 1784. Philip Lightfoot married Sallie S. Bernard in August of 1804 in Caroline County, VA (marriage record on Ancestry). They died and are buried in Port Royal, VA. (grave inscription transcript also on Ancestry, not from Find-a-Grave)

All of this seems to be intended to tie this person to a Cherokee woman named Ga ho ga. There is no relationship, since the profile is for a person who doesn't exist. Ga ho ga had two daughters named Nancy and Dorcas.

posted by Chris Hoult

L  >  Lightfoot  |  L  >  Lott  >  Sarah Ann (Lightfoot) Lott

Categories: Unsourced Profiles | North Carolina, Unsourced Profiles | Georgia, Unsourced Profiles