Source S185: Abbreviation: GEDCOM file imported on 30 April 2010: Title: GEDCOM file submitted by Thomas Gull - from Rootsweb.com gedcom file,. Imported on 30 April 2010.: Subsequent Source Citation Format: GEDCOM file submitted by Thomas Gull - from Rootsweb.com gedcom file. Imported on 30 April 2010.: BIBL GEDCOM file, Thomas Gull - from Rootsweb.com gedcom file.: TMPLT : Reference: DELANEY
↑ Source: #S06407 Data: Text: Date of Import: 27 Mar 2010
↑ Source: #S06407 Data: Text: Date of Import: 27 Mar 2010
Acknowledgments
This person was created on 14 September 2010 through the import of 124-DeCoursey.ged.
This person was created through the import of family.ged on 21 September 2010. The following data was included in the gedcom. You may wish to edit it for readability.
User ID: B00DED89393C4674A057B46C1B9FA5B78FBD
Reference: 3981
This person was created through the import of Samuel Giles- The Deacon.ged on 13 April 2011. The following data was included in the gedcom. You may wish to edit it for readability.
User ID: D152B4F6BD5544DF9CE96C0BB2CA180B9D95
Prior to import, this record was last changed 20:01 18 Oct 2001.
This person was created through the import of Samuel Giles- The Deacon.ged on 13 April 2011. The following data was included in the gedcom. You may wish to edit it for readability.
User ID: 80C55020502040D1935447D190EDB50D74A5
Prior to import, this record was last changed 20:01 18 Oct 2001.
WikiTree profile Lodewyck-17 created through the import of RYER.GED on Aug 19, 2011 by Lawrence Schliessmann. See the Changes page for the details of edits by Lawrence and others.
Is Unknown your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
This profile appears to be part of the fraudulent genealogy described by John Blythe Dobson in “The fraudulent Coligny-Rapalje descent,” Annals of Genealogical Research Vol. 2, No.1 (2006) at http://www.genlit.org/agr/viewarticle.php?id=1 .
The painter Abraham Janssen van Nuyssen married 1602 a women named Sara Goetkint (Antwerpen 1575-1644) no registration at Amsterdam of a marriage with a women named .... Lodewijcks/Lodewijks before 1602 The rejected match is set as wife of Jean Rapareillet who was married to Elizabeth Baudoin. See post at her profile , she can be merged away with one of the Elizabeth Baudoin profiles, because she has no parents attached genealogy online
Guess it's because some genealogies mention these people with LNAB already, they didn't use, sometimes not even in the New Netherlands , people get mixed up confused and in no time these families get jumbled up and this than is copied by many people. I see a lot of genealogies (Dutch also) where the LNAB adopted by children or sometimes even the grandchildren were given to their (grand)parents as well, knowing sometimes even children from one and the same family adopted different Last names, maybe explains the mess ;)
I believe the rejected match is probably the same intended woman as this profile, and it explains why this woman has Rapalje children attached.
However, I don't know if a mege is the best way to handle it, because if this was really a first wife of the famous Flemish painter Abraham Janssen, married une 13, 1594, which Geni also claims, then she must have died young, before his second and more accepted sourced marriage in 1602.
So it does not seem likely that this same woman also had earlier Rapalje children before 1594.
So maybe the solution is to move the Rapalje children over to the other woman.
It is a mess. I really don't understand how multiple researchers have conflated these two different families, unless there were really two Lodewyck women, and a famous man to attach to.
However, I don't know if a mege is the best way to handle it, because if this was really a first wife of the famous Flemish painter Abraham Janssen, married une 13, 1594, which Geni also claims, then she must have died young, before his second and more accepted sourced marriage in 1602.
So it does not seem likely that this same woman also had earlier Rapalje children before 1594.
So maybe the solution is to move the Rapalje children over to the other woman.
It is a mess. I really don't understand how multiple researchers have conflated these two different families, unless there were really two Lodewyck women, and a famous man to attach to.