no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Joseph Marks Sr. (abt. 1660 - 1740)

Joseph Marks Sr.
Born about in Massachusetts Bay Colonymap [uncertain]
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married about 1690 in Massachusetts Bay Colonymap [uncertain]
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 80 in Brookfield, Worcester, Province of Massachusetts Baymap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: S. Ford private message [send private message] and Angel Hundley private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 9 Apr 2013
This page has been accessed 2,175 times.

Biography

Joseph Marks was born about 1660, possibly in Massachusetts Bay Colony, but birthplace and parentage are uncertain. No marriage record has been found. His wife was Mary, last name unknown.[1] Both made their marks when signing documents, so were probably illiterate.

According to the Noyes-Gilman genealogy, [2] the land grants of Enfield, Conn. (formerly in Massachusetts) show that on June 30, 1684, Joseph Marks was granted 40 acres "provided he settles thereon and go about it as soon as his now time of service with Goodman Colton is out, managing and carrying on to the satisfaction of the committee, otherwise to forfeit it and lose all."

He was subsequently granted land at Springfield, west of the river, on February 2, 1685. [1]

Joseph was a soldier in Capt. Bull's company, which was sent from Springfield in November 1689 to help defend Albany and Schenectady from the French and Indians. He was taken captive on February 6, 1690 and carried to Canada.[1] By September 29, 1691, he was back in Springfield, where he appeared as plaintiff in two cases of debt, the court finding in his favor. [3] The following year he received 60 acres of upland in Brookfield for a house lot.[1]

He spent some time in Dedham around the mid-1690s. His son Joseph Jr. was born there in 1695-6, [4] and he is mentioned in the town records in 1696-97. [5]

By 1700, however, he appears to have settled permanently at Brookfield. In addition to the 60 acres of land he received after his return from Canada, he eventually acquired another 180 acres. Temple says that "[Joseph] and his sons had extensive grants of land on the southerly side of the Quabaug River... Marks Mountain is named for him." [1]

Joseph "departed this life Dec. ye 9th, 1740," according to the inventory sheet submitted for his probate.

Probate was opened May 13th, with the widow Mary Marks as administrator. John and Richard Marks signed the bond with her. The inventory was taken at Brookfield on January 26,1741. Sadly, it identifies Joseph as a slaveholder, for listed along with household and personal items is "An old negro man," name not shown. [6][7]

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Temple, J. H.; creator, History of North Brookfield, Massachusetts: preceded by an account of Old Quabaug, Indian and English occupation, 1647-1676, Brookfield Records, 1686-1783, with a genealogical register; Boston, Massachusetts,1887, p. 680. Also see pp. 140, 142, 145, 146, 155, 167, 194, 205. (https://www.familysearch.org/library/books/records/item/161005-history-of-north-brookfield-massachusetts-preceded-by-an-account-of-old-quabaug-indian-and-english-occupation-1647-1783-brookfield-records-1686-1783-with-a-genealogical-register?offset=)
  2. Noyes, Charles P., Noyes-Gilman Ancestry: Being a Series of Sketches, with a Chart of the Ancestors of Charles Phelps Noyes and Emily H. (Gilman) Noyes, his wife; New York, Gilliss Press, 1907, p. 419.
  3. West Brookfield Historical Commission, "Biography of Joseph Marks," citing History of East Brookfield, 1686-1970 Louis E. Roy, M.D. (https://westbrookfield.org/?page_id=140), accessed 10 Aug. 2022.
  4. The early records of the town of Dedham, Massachusetts, V. 1, p. 26; digital images, Archive. org (https://archive.org/details/earlyrecordsofto01dedh/page/26/mode/1up). "Joseph, the son Joseph & Mary Markes, born January 12, 1695-6."
  5. The early records of the town of Dedham, Mass., 1672-1706: a complete transcript of the town meeting and selectmen's records, V. 5, p. 247 (https://www.familysearch.org/library/books/viewer/205769/?offset=#page=251&viewer=picture&o=&n=0&q=), image 251 of 417.
  6. Worcester County, Massachusetts Probate File Papers, 1731-1881. AmericanAncestors.org, online database. New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2015. (From records supplied by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Archives.) (https://www.americanancestors.org/DB1635/i/30212/38765-co1/0)
  7. "Probate records v. 2 1739-1748, 1790-1827" database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-C9YY-KF42 : 11 February 2024), Film# 007704427, Worcester, Massachusetts, image 63, Vol 2, Page 87.

See also:

  • New Englanders in Nova Scotia, Manuscript. R. Stanton Avery Special Collections, New England Historic Genealogical Society, Boston, MA. (Online database. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2010.) No. 408 - PETERS, by F.E. Crowell, page 284.
  • Peters, Edmond Frank, Peters of New England, (New York, New York, Knickerbocker Press, 1919) 444 pages; as reproduced in facsimile by HeritageQuest.com.




Is Joseph your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Joseph by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Joseph:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 5

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Marks-1147 and Marks-749 appear to represent the same person because: Duplicate person
posted by Karen St. Jean
This stub profile is an artifact, imported with a GEDCOM ten years ago. Joseph Marks Sr. of Brookfield, MA has been incorrectly identified as father of Rev. John Marks of PA and VA in numerous Ancestry member trees, and probably in user trees on other sites as well. His wife Mary (sometimes confused with her daughter-in-law Mary nee Wheeler, widow of John Kedder) is often roped in and misidentified as well. They did, in fact, have a son John Marks, born 21 Sept. 1715, but he lived, married, bought and sold land, adopted two children, and died in Massachusetts, as proven by ample documentation. He was very definitely not the same man as Rev. John Marks of PA and VA.

I would respectfully suggest a merge of this profile Joseph Marks into Joseph Marks Sr. of Brookfield.

posted on Marks-1147 (merged) by S. Ford
edited by S. Ford
I would sincerely like to see the most accurate possible relationships on the profiles for Joseph Marks, Sr. and his family. I have removed myself as manager of two of the profiles, because my time is fully committed to a large project for the rest of the year at least. I posted the sources I could find in 2014 when I wrote the profiles, and I hope stronger and more accurate sources have been uncovered since then.

I would offer advice on how to proceed but have offered all that I know. Hopefully someone with a little time and more knowledge can fix these. Best regards,

April

Regarding the merge of Markes-1031 and Marks-749, Joseph Marks, senior has a death date confirmed by a note on the inventory of his estate.

He had a son, Joseph Marks, junior. I haven't found a death date for junior. Junior's wife was Experience Hinds, married 18 Nov 1718. A death date of 1775 might possibly be for junior, but could easily be for junior's son -- although I don't have a list of his children, so can't say if he had a son named Joseph Marks. (Junior's brother's sons are listed with no Joseph.)

Going by the wife and the approximate date of birth, the profile for Joseph Marks-1031 was likely intended to be Joseph Marks 'senior, so I suggest we merge the two, using the documented birth, married, death, dates on Marks-749.

Thank you.

Marks-1031 and Marks-749 appear to represent the same person because: These two were married to the same wife. The birth dates are close enough to be considered comparable. The death dates are very different; however, Marks-103 was 104 years old when he died. That makes his death date suspect.
posted by Barry Sweetman