no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

George (Martyn) Martin (1648 - bef. 1684)

George Martin formerly Martyn
Born in Salisbury, Essex, Massachusettsmap
Ancestors ancestors
[spouse(s) unknown]
[children unknown]
Died before before age 35 in Massachusettsmap
Profile last modified | Created 7 Dec 2015
This page has been accessed 2,384 times.
Massachusetts state seal
George (Martyn) Martin is a part of Massachusetts history.
Join: Massachusetts Project
Discuss: massachusetts

Biography

George was a son of George Martin and Susanna (North) Martin. He was born in Salisbury, Massachusetts, on 21 October 1648. [1][2]

George is not mentioned in his father's will, written 19 January 1683/4, indicating that he had died earlier. Six of the seven children named in the will were to receive just 5 shillings; the youngest son William was to receive the residue of the estate after the death or remarriage of his mother. In discussing the interpretation of the will, David L. Greene comments: "All experienced genealogists have seen wills that omit or living child or living children., almost always because they had already received their full portions. Such was not the case in the above will, for clearly all the living children except William had received their portions. There is no other way to interpret the token sum of five shillings..."[3] Accordingly, he cannot be George Martin of Chebacco parish, Ipswich, Massachusetts, who has often been identified as this man.[1]

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 Greene, "Salem Witches III: Susanna Martin," 'The American Genealogist,' vol 58, no. 4, pg 193
  2. Vital Records of Salisbury, Massachusetts, pg 151. Births: MARTYN, Georg, s. Georg and Susana, 21: 8 m: 1648
  3. Greene, "George Martin of Ipswich," 'The American Genealogist, vol. 56, page 158
  • Greene, David L. "George Martin of Ipswich," The American Genealogist, v. 56, 1980. pages 155-159
  • Greene, David L. "Salem Witches III: Susanna Martin," The American Genealogist, v. 58, 1982, no. 4, pages 193-204.




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of George's ancestors' DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 5

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
After exhaustive research, I concur that George died before his father wrote his will. The George Martin who married Elizabeth Durkee in 1712 was much younger than our George. Elizabeth herself was 22 years younger than our George would have been. Many have tried to say that they married much earlier, and changed Elizabeth's birth year, but that is really grasping at straws. No one has come up with any sources for that claim. As far as a missing death record for George, the birth record of the second William is also missing. The son William who was born in 1662 has a very clear record of death on the same day as his birth. The William that survived was probably born in 1664, and was very much alive when his father wrote his will. I think that something else was going on in 1664 in George and Susannah's lives, and that leads me to believe that George may have died in that year as well.
posted by Georgia (Crowell) Vallejos
edited by Georgia (Crowell) Vallejos
The quote from David L. Greene doesn't appear to me to be entirely logical or at least doesn't consider all possible explanations. If we accept that wills commonly omitted children because they had "received their full portions", then why could that not be the explanation in this case? Think of it this way: Six of the children each got 5 shillings, one got the residue, and one (or perhaps more) were not mentioned at all "because they had already received their full portions"?
posted by Mark Johnson
There could be many reasons why George was left out of his father's will. If he died, where is he buried? Deaths were well documented at this time. So I think this is the same person. Somethings will always be a mystery and we will never know for certain what happened.
Martin-38787 and Martyn-374 appear to represent the same person because: Same parents. Same birth. Please merge.
posted by Ellen Smith
Martin-23874 and Martin-38787 do not represent the same person because: The George Martin who was born to George Martin and Susannah Martin in 1648 is not the same man who settled in Ipswich and had a family. The son of George and Susannah died before his father made his will. Please read the biographies.
posted by Ellen Smith

Rejected matches › George Martin (abt.1648-1734)

M  >  Martyn  |  M  >  Martin  >  George (Martyn) Martin

Categories: Salisbury, Massachusetts | Massachusetts Project-Managed