no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Sarah (Meador) Huntley (abt. 1747 - abt. 1812)

Sarah Huntley [uncertain] formerly Meador aka Meadors, Meadows [uncertain]
Born about in Essex, Caroline County, Virginiamap
Ancestors ancestors
Daughter of [uncertain] and [uncertain]
Wife of — married about 1761 in Bedford, Virginiamap
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 65 in Gulledge Township, Anson County, North Carolinamap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Randy Williamson private message [send private message] and Heather Brown private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 30 Sep 2011
This page has been accessed 2,068 times.

Contents

Conflicting Information

Readily available information about the wife of Thomas Huntley contains several conflicts, particularly regarding her name(s) and her parents.

Given Name

Many online family trees and other poorly documented sources give ”Zilphia” or “Zilphia Sarah” as the given name for Thomas Huntley's wife. None have citations to original sources. Attempting to trace derivative source information back to it’s origins suggests that “Zilphia” as the name of Thomas Huntley’s wife is at best speculative, and may be in error.

One of the earliest known sources for “Zilphia”’s name appears to be a tenuous and speculative “memory” four generations later from a person not even related to the family.[1]

Another early source for “Zilphia”’s name is from membership applications to the Daughters of the American Revolution.[2] It was picked up by Major Perkins Nunnally,[3] and from Nunnally by Victor Meador.[4] Nunnally speculates that "Zilphia" might have been the daughter of Job Meador, while Meador may have been relying on information in land records, one of his preferred sources. In any event, these records need to be researched.

One such original record, Thomas Huntley’s will,[5] names his wife Sarah, not Zilphia (although he had a daughter named Zilphia). There are three possible explanations for the difference:

  • The original DAR applications are wrong. That this is a very real possibility is suggested by other errors noted in the early applications by the DAR. If the early DAR membership applications can be shown to depend on the early speculative “memory”, then the argument against “Zilphia” is even more compelling.
  • That Thomas Huntley’s wife was actually Zilphia Sarah. This is extremely unlikely, since most people at this time period did not have two given names, and a report of someone with two given names is almost always a flag that someone has confused two different people in early research. In this instance, one suspects that the compound given name was someone’s attempt to reconcile two different sets of information without reference to original records.
  • That Thomas had two wives. There is currently little to indicate that Thomas had two wives. If the early speculative “memory” and the early DAR membership applications can be seen to be independent, however, then the possibility of Thomas having two wives becomes more credible.[6] In either event, the conflict over his wife’s name creates the need to either prove or disprove such a possibility.

Parents

Many online family trees lacking citations to original sources also list Jason Meador as the father of Thomas Huntley’s wife. Where that originated is not clear. Early and late DAR membership applications do not name “Zilphia”’s father. The early speculative “memory” of “Zilphia” names Obediah Meadows as her brother, but Obediah Meador was the grandson of Jason Meador, making the “Zilphia” of memory more likely Thomas Huntley’s daughter, not his wife.

Neither a “Zilphia” nor a Sarah is named in Jason Meador’s will,[7] making it highly unlikely that he is the father. Nunnally, based on a DAR membership application that stated “Zilphia” was born in Bladen County, North Carolina (mother county of Anson County), speculated that she was the daughter of Job. Meador, again, followed Nunnally.

Family Name

The final question is whether or not Thomas Huntley’s wife was even a Meador.

Assuming that Huntley’s dates of birth for Thomas Huntley’s children are correct, then Thomas most likely married before he came to Anson County, and before Job Meador came to Anson County.

Huntley gives Thomas' oldest son, Thomas, a birth date of 1756 or earlier. Susannah's birth date is given as in the early 1750s. This implies a marriage date of about 1755 or perhaps a bit earlier for Thomas. Thomas did not arrived in Anson County, North Carolina until sometime between 1763 and 1769. (In 1763 he is presumed to be in Sampson/Duplin County, North Carolina. In 1769 he received a grant of land in Anson County.[8]
According to Nunnally, Job Meador was in Lunenburg County, Virginia, but moved to Anson County sometime before September 1761. Jason and his family left what had become Bedford County, Virginia late in 1761, joining Job in Anson County. [9]

In other words, Thomas was most likely married before he met anyone from the Meador families. Unless Thomas Huntley can be shown to be in reasonable proximity to a Meador family at the time of his marriage, his wife (first wife?) was not a Meador. If Thomas had a second wife, she and her parentage need to be documented, not guessed.

Research Notes

On 11 Dec 1796, Jason Meador was named as a friend and executor in the will of Peter Lowry, of Anson County, North Carolina. Suffiah Meador was one of the witnesses to the will.[10]

Biography

Sarah was the wife of Thomas Huntley at the time of his death, about 1802, in Anson County, North Carolina. She apparently outlived him -- according to family tradition, she died in 1812, although there is no record of the death.[11] She is probably buried with her husband in the Huntley Cemetery in Anson County.[12] Beyond that, virtually everything about Sarah is open to question and in need of supporting evidence.

Notes

The last names Mead/Meador/Meadors/Meadow/Meadows are used interchangeably in reporting this family line. Based on original records, the earliest documented ancestor used the name Meads. His son Thomas, grandson John, and great-grandson Jason all used the name Meador. Some of Jason's descendants, as well as descendants in other branches of the family, changed the family name to Meadows. Many present day researchers, for reasons of consistency, prefer to use the same family name for all members of a lineage, irrespective of what name a particular ancestor actually used. Needless to say, the name used depends on the name the researcher is familiar with, which creates confusion in the reporting.

Sources

  • Huntley, Virgil W., Thomas Huntley Sr. of Anson County, North Carolina: his descendants in the Carolinas and elsewhere. (Mystic, Connecticut: V.W. Huntley, c1988 (Dallas, Tex. : Taylor Publishing Company).Available On-line

Text References

  1. Huntley, Virgil W. Thomas Huntley Sr. of Anson County, North Carolina: his descendants in the Carolinas and elsewhere. (Mystic, Connecticut: V.W. Huntley, c1988 (Dallas, Tex. : Taylor Publishing Company), pp. 5, 8
  2. Huntley, Thomas, Ancestor #: A060808 Daughters of the American Revolution Genealogy Research. Accessed 28 Nov 2015
  3. Nunnally, Perkins, “The Descendants of Jonas and Frances Meador of Essex, Caroline and Cumberland Counties, Virginia”. (Pine Bluff, Arkansas: P. Nunnally, 1968) pp. 3, 8.
  4. Meador, Victor P. (Victor Paul), and Bernal M. Meador. Our Meador families in colonial America: as found in the records of Isle of Wight, Lancaster, (old) Rappahannock, Richmond, Essex and Caroline Counties, Virginia. (Independence, Missouri: V.P. Meador, 1983)
  5. Anson County Wills, 1802-1812, North Carolina Probate Records, 1735-1970, Vol 2, p. 69
  6. The one hint that Thomas may have two wives is from the earliest DAR membership applications, which give Thomas' wife's name as Mrs. Zilphia Huntley, not Zilphia Meadows.
  7. Anson County Wills, 1751-1779, Vol. 1, in North Carolina, United States. North Carolina Probate Records, 1735-1970, p. 16
  8. Huntley, Virgil W., Thomas Huntley Sr. of Anson County, North Carolina: his descendants in the Carolinas and elsewhere. (Mystic, Connecticut: V.W. Huntley, c1988 (Dallas, Tex. : Taylor Publishing Company). pp. 2-4
  9. Nunnally, Perkins, “The Descendants of Jonas and Frances Meador of Essex, Caroline and Cumberland Counties, Virginia”. (Pine Bluff, Arkansas: P. Nunnally, 1968. pp. 4-5
  10. McBee, Mary Wilson, compiler, Anson County, North Carolina abstracts of early records. (Greenwood, Mississippi, 1950), p. 123. (Available on-line in local Family History Centres.)
    Original source: Anson County, North Carolina, Will Book A, p. 47
  11. Huntley, Virgil W., Thomas Huntley Sr. of Anson County, North Carolina: his descendants in the Carolinas and elsewhere. (Mystic, Connecticut: V.W. Huntley, c1988 (Dallas, Tex. : Taylor Publishing Company). p. 2
  12. Zilphia Sarah Meadows Huntley, Memorial# 15732495, Find A Grave. Created by Shirley Overholser/Huntley Dobson, Sep 14, 2006. Accessed 28 Nov 2015

Acknowledgements

This profile is possible due to the collaborative efforts of the following Wikitree members:

This person was created through the import of DR fam 9.ged on 14 September 2010.





Is Sarah your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Sarah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Sarah:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 15

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Sorry, I can't add anything to clarify any answers to your question - I just have more questions. I have a DAR approved app through Thomas Huntley.

DAR considers the wife's name as Sarah. Per Ancestry.com DNA testing I have cMs through Matilda Huntley, 3rd ggmother, David Huntley 4th ggfather and Robert Huntley, 5th ggfather. Nothing through Thomas or Sarah which doesn't make sense.

Randy Williamson.

Hi, Randy,

Thanks for posting. I find your lack of matches really interesting.

posted by Gayel Knott
My husband is descended from Thomas Huntley. I know there is a lot of speculation over whether or not his wife was a Meador and what her name was. Through my husband's father's DNA testing, I have found over 60 DNA matches with descendants of Jason Meadors through other children. I am curious if anyone else has DNA work to try to confirm her parentage because the number of matches and strength of those matches seems to indicate an almost definite relationship despite what I'm reading here. I have worked on his tree extensively and find no other lines going back to Jason Meador. So whether her name was Sarah or Zilphia or something else, the DNA relationships from my perspective point strongly to her being of the Meador line.
posted by K Schreffler
Hi, K,

I agree with you that there appears to be a Meador in the family somewhere. The problem is where and how. The connections can come from cousins who married cousins, for example.

My guess is that Sarah is a 2nd wife, the daughter of one of Jason and Elizabeth's unknown older sons, and the mother of only one or two of Thomas's children. And that would be the "easy answer". The problem is documenting it, because the DNA matches are really only as good the documentary evidence they support. And that would mean doing "reasonably exhaustive" research (including all land and court records, for example) not only for Thomas, but all his children and siblings as well as any potential parents for Sarah, all their children and siblings, etc; and also going back a generation or two to make sure the Huntley and Meador paths did not cross a bit earlier.

As for DNA matches, I have literally hundreds of Meador DNA matches on Ancestry alone, and I'd guess that roughly 50%-75% have the wrong ancestor somewhere in their lines, usually in the connection to this generation.

posted by Gayel Knott
Meadows-2655 and Meador-494 appear to represent the same person because: Same birth, death, husband and child. See biography for Sarah ((Meador)) Huntley for why her name should (currently) be listed as Sarah Meador, not Zilphia Meadows
posted by Gayel Knott
I observed at the WIKITREE entry for Thomas Huntley (of Anson County), that his wife is listed as Sarah (Meador/Meadows) Huntley. In 1988, when Virgil Huntley published the genealogy,”Thomas Huntley, Sr. of Anson County, North Carolina”, he discussed the source (on pages 5 and 8) of the Meador/Meadows maiden name attributed to Thomas Huntley’s wife. Several years ago I contacted Virgil, and asked him for a copy of the specific historical reference, which identified the Meador/Meadows surname. The source was Ledger #2 by John Wilson Huntley, which is in the South Carolina archives. For your consideration, here is the specific ledger citation (on pages 42-43):

‘The Wadesboro Ansonian March 18th 1914 Since writing my last, I have been asked whom the first old setler Thomas Huntley married I could not then answer the question but think I can now, with some degree of certainty. Having ascertained that a considerable part of the land around about where Thomas Huntley lived was once owned by the Meadows family, I use this as a key to unlock the mistery, having in my rambles, called on Rev. Joe Ratcliff (col) [colored] I asked him if he knew where Thomas Huntley settled, the answer was he did then I asked him whom Thomas Huntley married, whereupon he assumed a meditative mood, saying that he knew if he could think, so I called over several prominant families, asking him if he [Thomas Huntley] married any of those, and he answered me in the negative; I then called the name Meadows and he slaped his hands and said yes, yes, yes-I asked him what her given name was, He said he [she?] was a sister of Obediah Meadows I have written it, just as I received it.” Based on this quote, I do not believe that Sarah’s surname was Meador/Meadows. Rev. Joe RatCliff was not a reliable source.

posted by James Allison
Unknown-186505 and Meador-494 appear to represent the same person because: same
posted by Philip Smith
Meador-494 and Meador-611 appear to represent the same person because: same
posted by Philip Smith
1. Thomas Huntley's will of 1800 mentions wife Sarah, not Zilphia Sarah.

2. Will of Jason Meador from 1774 does not mention a daughter Zilphia, AKA Zilpha. 3. More extensive argumentation found in Virgil Huntley book "Thomas Huntley Sr. Of Anson County NC", 1988. 4. We seem to lack reliable primary evidence on this and other Southern genealogies. I wish we did have better evidence!

Confused by the comment below, both profiles have her name as Zilphia Sarah Huntley...why leads you to believe they are different women?
posted by Robin Lee
Meador-611 and Meador-494 are not ready to be merged because: Sarah is mentioned in husband's will; are we sure there was not a previous wife named Zilphia?
Meador-611 and Meador-494 appear to represent the same person because: same interesting name and husband's name. While birthdates are different, I believe these are the same person.
posted by Robin Lee
Meador-494 and Meadows-62 appear to represent the same person because: same pls select proper last name
posted by Philip Smith
Meadors-108 and Meador-494 appear to represent the same person because: same family just alternate spelling of last name
posted by Robin Lee

M  >  Meador  |  H  >  Huntley  >  Sarah (Meador) Huntley