no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Thomas Meads (bef. 1638 - aft. 1658)

Thomas Meads aka Meades, Meade, Mead
Born before in Virginiamap
[spouse(s) unknown]
[children unknown]
Died after after age 20 [location unknown]
Profile last modified | Created 6 Aug 2010
This page has been accessed 391 times.
The Birth Date is a rough estimate. See the text for details.
US Southern Colonies.
Thomas Meads resided in the Southern Colonies in North America before 1776.
Join: US Southern Colonies Project
Discuss: southern_colonies

This profile was previously conflated in part with Thomas Meador. For details, see the Research Notes.


Contents

Biography

Thomas Meade was probably born about 1638, possibly in Virginia. He was the son of Thomas Meads. The first known record for Thomas names him as the son of Thomas Meade, deceased, on August 6, 1655. The record states he would remain in the custody of William Underwood[1]. He was mentioned again in December of 1655, and in November of 1656, in court cases between William Underwood, his guardian, and George Bryer, the administrator of Thomas Meades' estate[2][3]. He came of age sometime prior to December of 1658 when he sold James Hare 25 acres that he inherited from his father's estate but was yet to be divided[4]. There is no other record known to exist for Thomas after this time. Ann Hobbs, a descendant of his sister Mary Meades Hobbs later owned the whole 700 acres of land.

Research Notes

Additional Source Information

  • 1655-12-07, "whereas a court holden the 6th(?) of August last at the house of Mr. George Taylor it was ordered that Mr. Willm Underwood should be guardian to Thomas Meades (the son of Thomas Meads deceased) thi court doth now order thi whole estate belonging unto the said Tho: Meads in the hands of George Brier shall be delivered into the custody on the said Mr Underwood by the said by the said Brir for the use of the said Meads , he to be accountable according to the Act of Assembly[2].
  • 1658- 12 -__ , Thomas Meades to James Haire a 25 acres "given unto by my father Thomas Meades, deced and to my bro [missing text] in case that part of the land where the said James Hare is [missing text] my lott at the dividing of the said land. Signed Thomas (his + mark) Meades. Witnesses' first names are missing but last names were Meader, Bryer, and Brownwigg[4]. The clerk recorded the mark of Thomas Meades and it is a mark that has not been seen on any other record.

Disputed Spouse

A previous version of this profile identified his spouse as Sarah. This was based on a conflation of this Thomas with Thomas Meador. Deed records show that Sarah was married to Thomas Meador, son of Ambrose Meador.

Identifying Thomas Meader husband of Sarah is possible through a deed made by Sarah and her second husband Henry Awbrey[5].

...Know yee that I Henry Awbrey & Sarah my Wife for a valluable consideration to us paid doe graunt & make over for us & o'r heires all o'r Right tytle Claime & Interest of three hundred acres of land lying in the County of Rapp'a on the North side of the said River of Rapp'a unto Francis Gowre his heirs Exec's Adm's & assignes for ever w'ch Land was formerly the Land of Thomas Medor of Mr. James Williamson as by a Deed of Sale under the hand & seale of the said Williamson mor plainely appearth scituate Lying & adjoyning unto & upon the Land of Thomas Robinson w'ch Land the said Robinson likewise purchased of the above said Ambrose Medor being parte of one thousand acres of land bought of the said Williamson To Have & to Hold the said three hundred acres of Land unto him the said Francis Gowre w'ch the said Gowre is now seated upon & possest withall unto him & his heires for Ever with all Right & Priviledges thereunto belonging... In Witness whereof wee the p'ties abovesaid have hereunto sett o'r hands & seales this fifteenth of Aprill one thousand six hundred & seaventy
Signed Sealed & DD
Henry Awbrey
Sarah [her mark] Awbrey
in the presents of
John Awbrey
Tho: [his mark] Jenkins
Jno [his mark] Evans

Ambrose Meader made a deed over to his son Thomas Meader August 30, 1658 for 300 acres[6]. On the same day Thomas Meader sold 150 acres of this land to Richard Tomlynson[6]. Two months later, Oct 30, 1658, Thomas sold the other 150 acres to Lambert Lamberson[7]. Lambert Lamberson immediately sold the 150 acres to Robert Sisson[8]. Robert Sisson divided the tract selling 75 acres to John DeYoung in 1659[9] and the other 75 to Jenkin Hall in 1660[10]. Richard Tomlynson sold his 150 acres to Francis Gower in 1661[11]. In 1664 Francis Gower purchased the 75 from John DeYoung and wife Elizabeth[12], then in 1666 he purchased 75 acres from Thomas Colly "being that part thereof that was formerly purchased by Jenkin Hall of Robert Sison"[13]. Thus Francis Gower now owned the 300 acres sold by Thomas Meader in 1658.

Why would Henry and Sarah Awbrey have an interest in this particular 300 acres of land? For someone to have a vested interest in the whole 300 acres, their claim would have to reach back prior to August 30, 1658, as the land was at that time divided in half, with one half being further divided in half[6][7]. It is also of note that the deed only mentions Thomas and Ambrose Meader, James Williamson, who sold the land to Ambrose Meader, and James Robinson an adjoining landowner. It is silent on all of the other men who had owned the land since Thomas Meader sold it, an indication that their prior interest in the land had nothing to do with this transaction. Thomas and Sarah appear to have been married prior to 1658, as in April 1662 Sarah Meader, widow of Thomas Meader, the younger[14], lately dec'd, made deeds of gift to their 3 young children[15]. Sometime after Francis Gower purchased the last 75 acre tract in 1666 and before April of 1670 either Francis Gower or Henry and Sarah Awbrey must have realized that Sarah, as the widow of Thoms Meader, still had an interest in the land. When a married man sold land, it was the normal practice for the wife to relinquish her dower interest so that title would pass free of her potential future claim. If she failed to do so and eventually outlived her husband, she could claim her one-third from whoever owned the land at the time. [16][17][18]. Sarah did not sign the deed from Thomas Meader to Lambert Lamberson[7]. The signature area is missing from the deed to Richard Tomlynson but her name does not appear in what remains of text of the deed[6]. We see from the other deeds involving this land, that it was common practice, at this time in Rappahannock, for wives to join their husbands on the deed. If they did not, they provided a relinquishment of dower to be recorded in court. In fact, the deed recorded right after the Thomas Meader deed to Richard Tomlynson includes a dower relinquishment statement Mary Stewart the wife of Henry Stewart[19]. As the widow of Thomas Meader, Sarah, if she had not relinquished her dower, had a 1/3 interest in the 300 acres now owned by Francis Gower, so it was beneficial for Francis Gower to pay Henry and Sarah Awbrey to get them to relinquish her rights - as now Henry as her new husband, also had an interest in the land. There is no other person other than the widow of Thomas Meader, son of Ambrose, who would have had any established legal right to the whole of the 300 acres.

Also See Thomas Meador Research Revisited


Sources

  1. Lancastor County, VA Deeds and Wills Vol 1 page 209. https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-C9PF-HG3R
  2. 2.0 2.1 Lancastor County, VA Deeds and Wills Vol 1 page 233. https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-C9PF-HLT7
  3. Lancastor County, VA Deeds and Wills Vol 1 page 293. https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-C9PF-HGWR
  4. 4.0 4.1 Rappahannock County, Virginia Deed Book 2 page 53. https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9P6-367Z
  5. Rappahannock County, VA Deeds 1668-1672 Vol 4 page 298-299. image 174. https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-89P6-3NX6?i=173
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 August 30 1658 - Ambrose Meader to "my son" Thomas Meader 300 acres "being a part of one thousand acres conveyed unto me Ambrose Meader by Mr James Williamson". Adjoining land recently sold to Thomas Robinson. Thomas Meader of Rappahannock to Richard Tomlynson of Rappahannock. "lately given and granted" [missing text] "Thomas Meader by Ambrose Meader" With part of the page missing only the words "fifty acres" is visible but from later deeds it appears to have been 150 acres. Rappahannock County, VA Deeds 1656-1664 Vol 2 page 45. image 45 https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9P6-3D14
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 October 30, 1658 Thomas Meader to Lambert Lamberson 150 acres. Rappahannock County, VA Deeds 1656-1664 Vol 2 page 51. image 48 https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9P6-36SK
  8. October 1658 John Sherman, for Lambert Lamberson, to Robert Sisson 150 acres. Rappahannock County, VA Deeds 1656-1664 Vol 2 page 51. image 48 https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9P6-36SK
  9. December 26, 1859 - Robert and Ayme Sisson to John DeYoung "one half part of a parcel of land containing one hundred & fifty acres". While parts are missing the deed recites the chain of title from Ambrose Meader to Thomas Meader for three hundred acres, the deed from Thomas Meader to Lambert Lamberson, who then by his attorney John Sherlock, sold the land to Robert Sisson. Rappahannock County, VA Deeds 1656-1664 Vol 2 page 101-102. image 73 https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9P6-3D1G .
  10. Robert and Amy Sison to Jenkin Hall "seventy five acres being a part of three hundred acres of land sold and conveyed unto me by John Sherlock being true and lawfully attorney for Lambert Lamberson". Rappahannock County, VA Deeds 1656-1664 Vol 2 page 155-156. image. 100 https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9P6-3DTH
  11. December 24, 1661 - Richard Tomlynson to Francis Gower 150 acres "said Tomlynson my heirs or assigns or by from or under the before named Thomas Meader & Ambrose Meader". Richard Tomlynson, Judah Tomlynson. Rappahannock County, VA Deeds 1656-1664 Vol 2 page 228-229. image 136 https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9P6-3D2F
  12. April 9 1664 John and Elizabeth DeYoung to Francis Gower 75 acres. Rappahannock County, VA Deeds 1656-1664 Vol 2 page 410. image 211 https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9P6-3DND
  13. Rappahannock County, VA Deeds 1656-1664 Vol 3 page 196-197 . image 341 https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9P6-3688
  14. The words "the younger" could have been used here to identify which of the two deceased Thomas Meader/Meades she was the widow of. Thomas Meades died circa 1655.
  15. Rappahannock County, VA Deeds 1656-1664 Vol 2 page 247-248. image 146 https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9P6-3DGG?i=145&cat=413447
  16. Bob's Genealogy Filing Cabinet Article Dower and curtesy. Section titled Relinquishment of Dower. https://genfiles.com/articles/dower-and-curtesy/
  17. “Virginians … some time before 1674, had adopted a system of ‘bargain and sale’ procedure for land transactions. Both bargain-and-sale and fine-and-recovery transactions required the private examination of the wife to ascertain if she agreed to the sale. If a husband sold land without his wife’s agreement, she could, at his death, return to claim a third of the family’s real estate and possess it during her lifetime. Purchasers would be wary of acquiring land if they realized the seller’s widow might return to haunt them for the ‘thirds’ to which she was entitled during her lifetime. To solve this problem, a buyer could require the seller’s wife to renounce her dower rights at the time the land was sold. In order for the sale to be valid, the wife had to renounce her claims and agree that she did so without compulsion. The courts developed a procedure to examine the wife privately (with her husband absent) to verify that she granted her consent to the sale without his compulsion.” A CAVALIER ATTITUDE: AN ESSENTIAL PRIMER ON COLONIAL VIRGINIA GENEALOGY by Jeffrey Thomas Chipman on May 30, 2011, https://tao221.wordpress.com/2011/05/30/a-cavalier-attitude-an-essential-primer-on-colonial-virginia-genealogy/ citing Linda L Sturtz Within Her Power, Propertied Women in Colonial Virginia published by Taylor & Francis2013 p. 45
  18. For further reading see The William and Mary Quarterly Vol. 39, No. 1, The Family in Early American History and Culture (Jan., 1982), pp. 114-134 (21 pages) Published by: Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture. Free to read at JSTOR; https://www.jstor.org/stable/1923419
  19. See the release of Mary Stewart recorded in court right after the deed of Thomas Meader to Richard Tomlynson; Rappahannock County, VA Deeds 1656-1664 Vol 2 page 46. image 45 https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9P6-3D14

Acknowledgments

  • Temp for Gedcom Lynch imported the data for Thomas Meador from Lynch-Tree.ged, 6 Aug 2010 Five other people have also submitted gedcoms for Thomas Meador
  • Thank you to Jerry Ferren and Janet Ariciu for publishing your information on-line for easy access by other researchers.




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Thomas's ancestors' DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 31

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Hi all, we would like to get down to one surname for this family. If anyone has a preference for what that should be (Meades, Meads, Mead), let us know.

Renee

posted on Meador-4 (merged) by Renee Newman
Under the WikiTree naming conventions, the LNAB should either be the way it was spelled in the birth record or earliest available record referring to him, unless there is an error in that record and/or the family name was more commonly spelled in a different way at the time of the birth. Easy to say, sometimes tricky to apply -- I will leave it to you all to figure out how to apply that guideline in this case!
posted on Meador-4 (merged) by Scott McClain
Based on original records, he was most commonly known as Thomas Meads, followed by Meades. Mead and Meade were also used for the family. Meades seems to be more commonly used by researchers today.
posted on Meador-4 (merged) by Gayel Knott
We have completed our initial review of the underlying sources cited on David's free space page and we agree that there does appear to be a compelling case for the claim that Thomas Meador (Meador-933), the son of Ambrose (Meador-296), was the first husband of Sarah (___) Awbrey (Unknown-279063) based on the land transaction documents. The summary of our thinking is below. Based on this, we plan to suggest detaching Sarah (___) Awbrey (Unknown-279063) as the spouse of Thomas Meades (Meador-4) and attaching her instead as the spouse of Thomas Meador (Meador-933). (We will also need to make corresponding changes to the bios to reflect this new material.) Before was make this change we wanted to give everyone a chance to review this and give us feedback on our current thinking. Please let us know if you have any questions, comments, or concerns. We will continue reviewing documentation for some of the other profiles involved.

I have included our reasoning and the sources, so you all can see why we reached this conclusion. Renee

Identifying Thomas Meader husband of Sarah is possible through a deed made by Sarah and her second husband Henry Awbrey[1].

...Know yee that I Henry Awbrey & Sarah my Wife for a valluable consideration to us paid doe graunt & make over for us & o'r heires all o'r Right tytle Claime & Interest of three hundred acres of land lying in the County of Rapp'a on the North side of the said River of Rapp'a unto Francis Gowre his heirs Exec's Adm's & assignes for ever w'ch Land was formerly the Land of Thomas Medor of Mr. James Williamson as by a Deed of Sale under the hand & seale of the said Williamson mor plainely appearth scituate Lying & adjoyning unto & upon the Land of Thomas Robinson w'ch Land the said Robinson likewise purchased of the above said Ambrose Medor being parte of one thousand acres of land bought of the said Williamson To Have & to Hold the said three hundred acres of Land unto him the said Francis Gowre w'ch the said Gowre is now seated upon & possest withall unto him & his heires for Ever with all Right & Priviledges thereunto belonging... In Witness whereof wee the p'ties abovesaid have hereunto sett o'r hands & seales this fifteenth of Aprill one thousand six hundred & seaventy Signed Sealed & DD Henry Awbrey Sarah [her mark] Awbrey in the presents of John Awbrey Tho: [his mark] Jenkins Jno [his mark] Evans

Ambrose Meader made a deed over to his son Thomas Meader on August 30, 1658, for 300 acres[2]. On the same day, Thomas Meader sold 150 acres of this land to Richard Tomlynson[2]. Two months later, Oct 30, 1658, Thomas sold the other 150 acres to Lambert Lamberson[3]. Lambert Lamberson immediately sold the 150 acres to Robert Sisson[4]. Robert Sisson divided the tract selling 75 acres to John DeYoung in 1659[5] and the other 75 to Jenkin Hall in 1660[6]. Richard Tomlynson sold his 150 acres to Francis Gower in 1661[7]. In 1664 Francis Gower purchased the 75 from John DeYoung and wife Elizabeth[8], then in 1666 he purchased 75 acres from Thomas Colly "being that part thereof that was formerly purchased by Jenkin Hall of Robert Sison"[9]. Thus Francis Gower now owned the 300 acres sold by Thomas Meader in 1658.

Why would Henry and Sarah Awbrey have an interest in this particular 300 acres of land? For someone to have a vested interest in the whole 300 acres, their claim would have to reach back prior to August 30, 1658, as the land was at that time divided in half, with one half being further divided in half[2][3]. It is also of note that the deed only mentions Thomas and Ambrose Meader, James Williamson, who sold the land to Ambrose Meader, and James Robinson an adjoining landowner. It is silent on all of the other men who had owned the land since Thomas Meader sold it, an indication that their prior interest in the land had nothing to do with this transaction. Thomas and Sarah appear to have been already been married in 1658, as in April 1662 Sarah Meader, widow of Thomas Meader, the younger[10], lately dec'd, made deeds of gift to their 3 young children[11]. Sometime after Francis Gower purchased the last 75-acre tract in 1666 and before April of 1670 either Francis Gower or Henry and Sarah Awbrey must have realized that Sarah, as the widow of Thoms Meader, still had an interest in the land. When a married man sold land, it was the normal practice for the wife to relinquish her dower interest so that title would pass free of her potential future claim. If she failed to do so and eventually outlived her husband, she could claim her one-third from whoever owned the land at the time. [12][13][14]. Sarah did not sign the deed from Thomas Meader to Lambert Lamberson[3]. The signature area is missing from the deed to Richard Tomlynson but her name does not appear in what remains of text of the deed[2]. We see from the other deeds involving this land, that it was common practice, at this time in Rappahannock, for wives to join their husbands on the deed. If they did not, they provided a relinquishment of dower to be recorded in court. In fact, the deed recorded right after the Thomas Meader deed to Richard Tomlynson includes a dower relinquishment statement by Mary Stewart the wife of Henry Stewart[15]. As the widow of Thomas Meader, Sarah, if she had not relinquished her dower, had a 1/3 interest in the 300 acres now owned by Francis Gower, so it was beneficial for Francis Gower to pay Henry and Sarah Awbrey to get them to relinquish her rights - as now Henry as her new husband, also had an interest in the land. There is no other person other than the widow of Thomas Meader, son of Ambrose, who would have had an established legal right to the whole of the 300 acres.

posted on Meador-4 (merged) by Renee Newman
Sources

↑ Rappahannock County, VA Deeds 1668-1672 Vol 4 page 298-299. image 174. https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-89P6-3NX6?i=173 ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 August 30 1658 - Ambrose Meader to "my son" Thomas Meader 300 acres "being a part of one thousand acres conveyed unto me Ambrose Meader by Mr James Williamson". Adjoining land recently sold to Thomas Robinson. Thomas Meader of Rappahannock to Richard Tomlynson of Rappahannock. "lately given and granted" [missing text] "Thomas Meader by Ambrose Meader" With part of the page missing only the words "fifty acres" is visible but from later deeds it appears to have been 150 acres. Rappahannock County, VA Deeds 1656-1664 Vol 2 page 45. image 45 https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9P6-3D14 ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 October 30, 1658 Thomas Meader to Lambert Lamberson 150 acres. Rappahannock County, VA Deeds 1656-1664 Vol 2 page 51. image 48 https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9P6-36SK ↑ October 1658 John Sherman, for Lambert Lamberson, to Robert Sisson 150 acres. Rappahannock County, VA Deeds 1656-1664 Vol 2 page 51. image 48 https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9P6-36SK ↑ December 26, 1859 - Robert and Ayme Sisson to John DeYoung "one half part of a parcel of land containing one hundred & fifty acres". While parts are missing the deed recites the chain of title from Ambrose Meader to Thomas Meader for three hundred acres, the deed from Thomas Meader to Lambert Lamberson, who then by his attorney John Sherlock, sold the land to Robert Sisson. Rappahannock County, VA Deeds 1656-1664 Vol 2 page 101-102. image 73 https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9P6-3D1G . ↑ Robert and Amy Sison to Jenkin Hall "seventy five acres being a part of three hundred acres of land sold and conveyed unto me by John Sherlock being true and lawfully attorney for Lambert Lamberson". Rappahannock County, VA Deeds 1656-1664 Vol 2 page 155-156. image. 100 https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9P6-3DTH ↑ December 24, 1661 - Richard Tomlynson to Francis Gower 150 acres "said Tomlynson my heirs or assigns or by from or under the before named Thomas Meader & Ambrose Meader". Richard Tomlynson, Judah Tomlynson. Rappahannock County, VA Deeds 1656-1664 Vol 2 page 228-229. image 136 https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9P6-3D2F ↑ April 9 1664 John and Elizabeth DeYoung to Francis Gower 75 acres. Rappahannock County, VA Deeds 1656-1664 Vol 2 page 410. image 211 https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9P6-3DND ↑ Rappahannock County, VA Deeds 1656-1664 Vol 3 page 196-197 . image 341 https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9P6-3688 ↑ The words "the younger" could have been used here to identify which of the two deceased Thomas Meader/Meades she was the widow of. Thomas Meades died circa 1655. ↑ Rappahannock County, VA Deeds 1656-1664 Vol 2 page 247-248. image 146 https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9P6-3DGG?i=145&cat=413447 ↑ Bob's Genealogy Filing Cabinet Article Dower and curtesy. Section titled Relinquishment of Dower. https://genfiles.com/articles/dower-and-curtesy/ ↑ “Virginians … some time before 1674, had adopted a system of ‘bargain and sale’ procedure for land transactions. Both bargain-and-sale and fine-and-recovery transactions required the private examination of the wife to ascertain if she agreed to the sale. If a husband sold land without his wife’s agreement, she could, at his death, return to claim a third of the family’s real estate and possess it during her lifetime. Purchasers would be wary of acquiring land if they realized the seller’s widow might return to haunt them for the ‘thirds’ to which she was entitled during her lifetime. To solve this problem, a buyer could require the seller’s wife to renounce her dower rights at the time the land was sold. In order for the sale to be valid, the wife had to renounce her claims and agree that she did so without compulsion. The courts developed a procedure to examine the wife privately (with her husband absent) to verify that she granted her consent to the sale without his compulsion.” A CAVALIER ATTITUDE: AN ESSENTIAL PRIMER ON COLONIAL VIRGINIA GENEALOGY by Jeffrey Thomas Chipman on May 30, 2011, https://tao221.wordpress.com/2011/05/30/a-cavalier-attitude-an-essential-primer-on-colonial-virginia-genealogy/ citing Linda L Sturtz Within Her Power, Propertied Women in Colonial Virginia published by Taylor & Francis2013 p. 45 ↑ For further reading see The William and Mary Quarterly Vol. 39, No. 1, The Family in Early American History and Culture (Jan., 1982), pp. 114-134 (21 pages) Published by: Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture. Free to read at JSTOR; https://www.jstor.org/stable/1923419 ↑ See the release of Mary Stewart recorded in court right after the deed of Thomas Meader to Richard Tomlynson; Rappahannock County, VA Deeds 1656-1664 Vol 2 page 46. image 45 https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9P6-3D14

posted on Meador-4 (merged) by Renee Newman
On another vein, please leave me as a profile manager. I am still very active in researching and addressing my Family Genealogy.
posted on Meador-4 (merged) by Patrick Garcia
I have been giving this discussion a lot of thought lately and decided to add my two cents. I started tracing my family back in the 1970s. After talking to a few living relatives, I did a lot of research at Genealogy Societies, public libraries, Rootsweb and the LDS Genealogy Library. The only information I was able to find regarding this family was that a Thomas Meador/Meads/Meader born in England around 1610-1615 had migrated to Virginia sometime in the 1630s. He married in Virginia, wife unknown, had at least two sons, Thomas and John. He died young. I checked any baptismal record in England for a Thomas Meador/Meads/Meader and found one from 1610 in Devonshire, the son of Thomas and Elizabeth Wellstead. There were others, but the father's name never appeared later in the family. Sometime in the 1990s I noticed that someone had claimed that this Thomas was the son of Ambrose Meador/etc and had migrated to Virginia in 1638 using the name Meades. Also someone claimed his wife was Sarah, someone else claimed she was Sarah Yates. Also there was claim that an Ambrose Meador/etc had migrated about the same time. Ambrose also had two sons, Thomas and John. Thomas born a short time prior to Thomas II. It appears from the interaction between Thomas and Ambrose they are either brothers or cousins. If Ambrose is in fact the brother of Thomas the immigrant, it makes total sense that he would be involved in deals with his young nephew Thomas the "Orphan, but that doesn't mean he is the father of that same Thomas. I have not read anything that positively proves that Ambrose is the father of the one known as Thomas the Orphan. I am proposing that we leave things as they are, Thomas Meador being the father of Thomas Meador the "Orphan. Also the only reference I have seen which shows the last name as Meades is the immigration record and don't think that is an original, but something written decades later. By the way I have seen that in some cases the name morphed into "Meadows." Thank you for reading this.
posted on Meador-4 (merged) by Patrick Garcia
There are a large number of profile managers on this profile due to past merges - current managers, please reply and confirm that you are still interested in being an active manager (i.e., responding to merge & trusted list requests, etc.). Inactive managers will be removed but remain on the trusted list. Thanks all!
posted on Meador-4 (merged) by Scott McClain
I am on the list although due to family problems can’t work on this right now. However I have been following the comments. I had hoped to help on the Southern Colonies project but again, too many family things going on in past years. Please leave my name as one of the trusted list.
posted on Meador-4 (merged) by Ruth (Hundley) Hodges
edited by Ruth (Hundley) Hodges
Scott,

You can remove me as a profile manager, yet leave me on the trusted list. Out or respect for our ancestors and the need for solid sources/data, I have not made changes because I do not think I am qualified to do so. Thanks!

posted on Meador-4 (merged) by Melissa Gebhardt
As Scott said, if you aren’t going or be able to actively participate, then you should be on the trusted list, where you get notified of any activity, as opposed to being a profile manager.

Scott, I see that Sypniewski-1 has been inactive for 3 years…

Thanks for overseeing this!

posted on Meador-4 (merged) by Darlene (Athey) Athey-Hill
On behalf of the Southern Colonies Project, I will be reviewing the documentation for, and family relationships of, Meador-4 and Meador-933, as requested on G2G. If there is anything further I should know, feel free to add a message here to let me know.

Renee Newman

posted on Meador-4 (merged) by Renee Newman
edited by Renee Newman
Thank you, Renee. I have attempted to put it all together in the easiest way for others to make sense of, but it's a very complicated mess... Please let me know if anything I documented is unclear or needs more work.

David

posted on Meador-4 (merged) by David Martin
It is time to rewrite this profile and change the birth name for Thomas and all of his siblings back to Meades (or some variation, such as Meads, Mead or Meade). I hope someone who has read and understood the proof that has been documented here and here will take this into consideration.

VR, David

posted on Meador-4 (merged) by David Martin
I already posted a similar comment to the profile currently attached here as the father of Thomas Meador, but I believe it warrants a double-posting. Please see why Thomas Meades needs to be detached, and please don't overreact before reading, but Ambrose Meador needs to be attached as the father for this profile:

https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Space:Thomas_Meador_Research_Revisited

posted on Meador-4 (merged) by David Martin
Actually, I guess it would be messier and more confusing to detach this Thomas from the Mead(es) family and add him to Ambrose Meador's family, since there is already a profile for Ambrose's son, Thomas. All related profiles will require major updates, though, so please chime in if anyone would like to discuss my research that proves this needs to be done.
posted on Meador-4 (merged) by David Martin
edited by David Martin
David,

As said already, you are doing a great job of providing access to actual records. So far, there is nothing in those records, however, to warrant the major changes you are proposing.

posted on Meador-4 (merged) by Gayel Knott
David, You are doing a great job of finding and recording locations of original records and it would be great if they could be added to the appropriate profiles. I've had a number of other situations demanding immediate attention and have been unable to start adding them to appropriate profiles, but hope to be able to do so soon.

That said, none of them disprove the information provided by Meador. If anything, they simply strengthen the relationships he reported.

There is nothing in any of the records, including in the original copy of the land grand to Thomas Meads (Sr) to suggest that it was "intentionally ambigously-worded" (your description), it was clearly the land inherited by his named son Thomas Meades "Orphan", it was clearly the land inherited by Thomas Meades "Ophan"'s son John and disposed of by him later. The line of descent is therefore, Thomas Meades, Thomas Meades "Orphean", John Meador. No conspiracies on the part of unnamed government officials or other's present living at the time.

posted on Meador-4 (merged) by Gayel Knott
This is the third time you have ignored the proof I laid out plainly that Thomas Mead(es) was long dead before the rights to that patent were transferred to a living man named Thomas Meader. Do you have any thoughts about that specific fact?
posted on Meador-4 (merged) by David Martin
David, you haven't proved anything, you added your thoughts and speculations. I haven't ignored your thoughts and speculations. They aren't proof, they are thoughts and speculations, and do not withstand comparison with other information provided in other information taken as a whole.
posted on Meador-4 (merged) by Gayel Knott
That isn't true. It's a fact that Thomas Mead(es) was dead by 1655 when his will was probated. It's a fact that the right to this patent were transferred by John Cooke to a living man named Thomas Meader four years later, in 1659.
posted on Meador-4 (merged) by David Martin
Does silence mean you think that is speculation?
posted on Meador-4 (merged) by David Martin
Does this do a better job with the Chain of Title?
posted on Meador-4 (merged) by David Martin

M  >  Meads  >  Thomas Meads

Categories: Pack Name Study | Estimated Birth Date | Virginia Colonists