no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Alexander (Menzies) of Fortingall (abt. 1350 - aft. 1382)

Alexander of Fortingall formerly Menzies
Born about [location unknown]
Ancestors ancestors
Son of and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died after after about age 32 [location unknown]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Scotland Project WikiTree private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 24 Jan 2013
This page has been accessed 942 times.
Declaration of Arbroath
Alexander (Menzies) of Fortingall was descended from a signer of the Declaration of Arbroath.
Join: Scotland Project
Discuss: Scotland

Biography

This profile is part of the Menzies Name Study.
Alexander (Menzies) of Fortingall is a member of Clan Menzies.

Alexander was the son and heir of Sir Thomas de Menzies.[1] Following his father's death, he granted the lands of Oyne, which he inherited, to Archibald Weschell.[2] The lands of Fortingall were confirmed to him under the Great Seal[2]and on 9 March 1381 he received a charter from Euphemia, countess of Ross, granting him Fechelly in Aberdeenshire. An index, drawn up about the year 1629, of many records of charters, granted by the different sovereigns of Scotland between the years 1309 and 1413, most of which records have been long missing. With an introduction, giving a state, founded on authentic documents still preserved, of the ancient records of Scotland, which were in that kingdom in the year 1292. To which is subjoined, indexes of the persons and places mentioned in those charters ... by Great Britain. [3]


This Sir Alexander de Menzies married Janet de Atholl, the daughter of Robert de Atholl.[1][4] There was one child from this marriage:


Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 MacGregor, Gordon. The Red Book of Scotland. Scotland: by the author (2016), rev. 2020, vol. 6, p. 722.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Robertson's Index; cited in MacGregor, Gordon. The Red Book of Scotland. Scotland: by the author (2016), rev. 2020, vol. 6, p. 722.
  3. General Register Office (Scotland) 1n; Robertson, William, 1740-1803, Published 1798: Edinburgh, Printed by Murray & Cochrane.
  4. The Genealogy of the Families of Douglas of Mulderg and Robertson of Kindeace with their Descendants. Dingwall: A.M. Ross & Company,(1895), p. 49 available online.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this profile. Click the changes tab to view all contributors.





Is Alexander your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Alexander by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 3

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
I believe Alexander is the second son of Robert (Menzies-4153) and not a son of Thomas. He is described as 'of Fortingall' in the Red & White book (p 78, cited in Thomas' profile) - perhaps he inherited when his uncle died s.p.?

Regarding his wife Janet/Jean, daughter of Robert of Atholl: Either the author of the Red & White book is mistaken and the father is not Robert Stewart but Robert Donnchaidh (later clan Robertson) whose father was also called 'of Atholl', or the Robertsons are mistaken and Alexander's current wife should be disconnected. (I don't have access to the Red Book of Scotland to see what they think)

posted by Callum Simms
Even supposing that all of the sources in this profile are mistaken (which is a bit of a stretch), your suggestion means that Robert Menzie's second son (if he was Alexander) was born when Robert himself was at least 83 years old. That seems highly unlikely.
posted by Jen (Stevens) Hutton
Good point. Then again, Thomas was also 81 at the time.

Something's up with Alexander's birth date (I don't see a source for that), or else he is a grandson of one of the brothers, not a son. The Red & White book does say he was married around 1370 - he could have been 50-70 at the time, I suppose, but consider he has a child by Janet.

posted by Callum Simms