Margaret Mitchell was born to parents William Mitchell and Elizabeth Innes on either January 16, 1693[1] or July (15 ?) 1683[2] in Aberdeen, Scotland (NOT in Swift Creek, Henrico County, Virginia). [3][4][5][6][7]
Margaret married Henry Charles Clay about 1707 and their children (probably) included:
Amey Clay (1708, married William Green)
William Mitchell (1708/09, married Martha),
Mary (1710, married Richard Belcher),
Henry (1711, married Lucy Green),
Martha (1713, married William Bass),
Charles (1716, married Martha Green),
John (1718, married Elizabeth Hudson).
Margaret and Henry lived in a part of Henrico County, Virginia that became Chesterfield County in 1749. Henry owned land on Deep Creek, Swift Creek, and Nut Tree Branch in Chesterfield County as well as land on Let Alone Branch in Goochland County, Virginia.
Deep Creek, Swift Creek, and Nut Tree Branch are southwest of Richmond, Virginia and Let Alone Branch is a bit more southwest. He also owned a grist mill on Nut Tree Branch. The family enslaved many people.
Henry died on August 3, 1760 at Nattles at the Raells. Margaret Mary lived almost two decades longer; she passed away on August 7, 1777 at The Raells, Chesterfield County, Virginia. [3][4]
Random Facts
Born
16 January 1693; Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire, Scotland.
alt. location.
Found multiple copies of birth date. Using 16 January 1693
In 1726 Henry witnessed Ralph Blankenship's will.
Research Notes
Regarding her mother:
Please see the Marriage Info citation before changing her mother to a different Elizabeth Mitchell. There are TWO Elizabeth (Innes) Mitchells, and apparently both married men named William. But they are different women:
Baptismal Record possibly found, since all her siblings were born in Scotland and she was the middle child. She had to have been born in Scotland and not in Virginia. As previously thought it has been proven her parents were born and married in Scotland per their marriage record. They must have migrated to America as a family when the children were very young.
Find A Grave: Memorial #42731442, page for Mary Mitchell Clay (16 Jan 1693–7 Aug 1777), Unknown grave location; accessed 1 August 2020; Maintained by Peggy Patrick Wallace (contributor 46876949)
This was a link to a "Rootsweb World Connect Family Tree" but they are being discontinued and "moved to Ancestry.com as a Free resource later in 2024":[4]
* Ancestry Family Trees Publication: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com. Original data: Family Tree files submitted by Ancestry members. Ancestry Family Trees.
Acknowledgements
Created through the import of LaBach Family TreeApril28_2011.ged on 05 May 2011.
Mitchell-2577 created through the import of Mimi.ged on Sep 15, 2011 by Richard Draper.
Mitchell-4164 and 4165 created through the import of Ehrbar Family Tree.ged on Oct 2012 by Jeffery Owens.
Mitchell Clay-1 was created by Paul Bailey through the import of Bailey Family Tree.ged on Dec 14, 2014.
Mitchell-9880 created by Hank Dillon through the import of Dillon.ged on Jan 21, 2015.
Is Margaret your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Margaret by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Margaret:
Mitchell-47531 and Mitchell-1548 appear to represent the same person because: Yet another duplicate- I don't understand and realize I've asked this before so I'm deleting some of my older comments and requesting this is approached please.
Becky, I'm interested in this, but I can't invest in it right now. I think the problem comes from Elizabeth Innes' lineage. Were there two Elizabeth Inneses descended from different families? Who were the parents of the proper one, etc. Scottish tradition often names the first male after the paternal grandfather and the second male after the maternal grandfather which sets up a nightmare for genealogists since many cousins end up with the same names. Add to that the fact that the same was true for daughters and grandmothers and the fact that people didn't move far at that time in general so the available marriage pool would be people named after their grandparents too. At least I find it terribly confusing to try to wade through it all. But if your merge takes place before this all gets sorted, it will make a perplexing problem just get worse! Hopefully someone can take this on and get it resolved.
I hoped that by posting on the other profile and editing the last merge completed by someone who has been completing merges and leaving them fraught with duplicates and messy pages that it would garner someone's attention who was better at articulating information to other users. Plus I honestly didn't expect it to go through as I made. Suggestion but recanted after seeing and cleaning up a mess left from a merge completed at some point between the one where I simply merged a profile out (July 2022) and my comment made 5 days ago. I was surprised so many errors had gone unseen (myself included with so many of us on here). I'm going to investigate your hypotheses this weekend and see if there is anything to be done to prevent it at least a little bit.
This is the NOTE I wrote on through profile and when I went to approve it it took me to the merge which was easy to complete bcI kept everything in place, fixed a few typos and corrected a spacing technicality. Deleted what little information was on the 1st merged profile but this was the note:
I adopted this after finding and posting about all of these dupes- I only did so in order to pass the merge through so the large team on the original profile can proceed to take this one over. Again, I didn't create it but am tired of proposing her merges ;) Thanks! [[Simmons-11603 |Becky Elizabeth]
I realize but didn't create this profile...I was noting that I adopted it in order to get rid of it as it was orphaned and the merge had been pending without approval from that profile. I should've just let it be and no one would've known but I try to use full disclosure in the event something is accidentally changed etc and anyone wondering can contact me to explain, fix or learn from it. Thanks for the reply as always and it is good to leave for those duplicating profiles who may not know how to check or may not think it is important.
The birth dates and birth locations on the FindAGrave memorial conflict with those on the profile and it is causing a database error. It would clear the error if you moved it to the bio under a research notes heading with an explanation. That is if you choose to use the citation on this profile. There isn't much on there that is helpful and FindAGrave isn't a viable source. Could also use sameas/no but it's not recommended. Here is a discussion in g2g that may help
Thank you for the Excellent profile and Notes of Clarification. Unfortunately I spent my time working backwards asking questions on the connected parents, grandparents profiles as to why they only cited one source that didn't link to the correct locations and why there was overwhelming evidence supporting a move to America yet all death locations remain in Moray, Scotland? I hope we can all work together, sharing sources if necessary, to stop the misinformation now circulating. I began looking at the profiles for Elizabeth Douglass and John Innis when I saw a son Andrew listed with the wikitree profile as the only cited source...but that page doesn't have any sources, references or notes. It is disappointing because when beginning on wikitree I accepted certain familial pathways as correct before researching them fully (pre-1500 profiles) so I may not be related to the couple but Maragaret Hannah Mitchell Clay is definitely my 9th great grandmother and brother William is a great grandfather through the marriage of their respective children (1st cousins- yikes).
Apologies to ramble but again I wanted to say this is a well organized profile and I would like to reference it in conversation regarding potential inconsistencies with Ancestor information...not as criticism but as a positive reference.
Cheers! Becky
Mitchell-26009 and Mitchell-1548 appear to represent the same person because: the birth dates and locations, and the death dates and locations match perfectly. And even though Mitchell-26009 has no spouse listed, her current last name matches the spouse of Mitchell-1548. They are clearly the very same lady.
Oh, and they have the same father, who has likewise been recommended for a merge!
- Becky
https://www.wikitree.com/g2g/920519/proper-use-of-sameas-no?show=920519#q920519.
Apologies to ramble but again I wanted to say this is a well organized profile and I would like to reference it in conversation regarding potential inconsistencies with Ancestor information...not as criticism but as a positive reference. Cheers! Becky
Oh, and they have the same father, who has likewise been recommended for a merge!
edited by Bartley McRorie