no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Margaret Frances (Moore) Hunt (1698 - 1752)

Margaret Frances Hunt formerly Moore
Born in Hopewell, Mercer, New Jerseymap
Ancestors ancestors
Sister of [half], [half], [half], [half], [half], [half], [half], [half] and [half]
Wife of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Wife of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 54 in New Jerseymap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: James Luper private message [send private message] and James Davis private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 13 Jul 2011
This page has been accessed 2,272 times.

Biography

Margaret Frances (Moore) Hunt was born in 1698 in Hopewell, Mercer, New Jersey, daughter of Gershom Moore (~1670 - 1722) and Anne (Sackett) Moore (~1672 - 1757).

Her siblings were:

  1. Samuel Moore (1711 - 1788)
  2. Mary Moore (~1713 - )
  3. Ann (Moore) Hallett (1715 - 1763)
  4. Sarah Moore (1718 - )
  5. Benjamin Moore (1720 - ~1745)
  6. John Moore (~1722 - )
  7. Elizabeth Moore (~1724 - )
  8. Patience (Moore) Lawrence (1727 - 1782)
  9. John Moore (1730 - )

Margaret married John Hunt (~1693 - ~1748).[1] Their son was Jonathan Hunt (1716 - 1782).

Margaret married John A. Hunt (~1688 - 1741). Their children were:

  1. Wilson Hunt (1714 - 1782)
  2. John Hunt (1719 - )
  3. Joanna Hannah (Hunt) Greene (~1719 - ~1789)
  4. Noah Hunt (1722 - )
  5. Daniel Hunt (~1726 - ~1802)
  6. Enoch Hunt (1728 - ~1762)
  7. Gershom Hunt (1730 - 1810).

Margaret died in 1752 in New Jersey aged ~54.

Sources

  1. New York City, Compiled Marriage Index. New York Genealogical and Biographical Record (quarterly), 1925, selected extracts published New York Genealogical and Biographical Society Publication Place New York, NY Page79




Is Margaret your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Margaret by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Margaret:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 7

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Moore-47041 and Moore-5181 appear to represent the same person because: Moore-47041 was created as the wife of John Hunt, with the same dates as Margaret Moore-5181 and the same location. Her name was originally in the profile as "Martha", but after consultation with the profile creator, it is agreed that she was actually a duplicate of Margaret.
posted by Barry Smith
This profile was originally created as a spouse of John Hunt, with the only source being the imprecisely specfieid "U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900," the Ancestry database that is known to be quite unreliable. Within a day, the profile creater had removed John Hunt as husband and then switched the source to "Mayflower Births and Deaths, Vol. 1 and 2." Only three Martha Moores are in that latter Ancestry database, and the one born in 1698 died in Montgomery, Massachusetts in 1780. She is shown only as the spouse of Amos Moore, and her maiden surname is unknown, so she is absolutely not the woman with the birth and death information given here.

A decision needs to be made. Either this profile was intended to be the spouse of John Hunt, in which case the name "Martha" was a mistake for Margaret and this profile should be merged with Margaret Moore, the spouse of John Hunt who has these same birth and death dates and places. The source should be reverted back to their marriage record.

Otherwise, she should have her dates switched to match those of Martha (Owen) Moore and then those profiles should be merged. Either way, a merger needs to happen.

Only the original PM may know the true intention, although it seems that intention switched within one day of creating the profile. So maybe it doesn't matter and the decision should be made arbitrarility. In that case, removing this source, switching the name to Margaret, removing the "Rejected Match" with John Hunt's wife Margaret and merging them is the easiest solution.

posted on Moore-47041 (merged) by Barry Smith
edited by Barry Smith
Agreed, thanks, please start the merge.
posted on Moore-47041 (merged) by Ellen Gustafson
Moore-5188 and Moore-5181 appear to represent the same person because: Same person
posted by Ellen Gustafson
If Margaret was married to Edward Hunt, please find records so pending merge can be removed, thanks.
posted by [Living Poole]
Moore-31527 and Moore-5188 appear to represent the same person because: Same descendants and place of burial.
posted by Dennis Maye
Moore-16044 and Moore-5188 appear to represent the same person because: same woman, we just don't have exact vitals for her
posted by Beryl Meehan

M  >  Moore  |  H  >  Hunt  >  Margaret Frances (Moore) Hunt