no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

James Morgan III (1667 - 1748)

Deacon James Morgan III
Born in New London, New London County, Connecticut Colonymap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Husband of — married 24 Jun 1729 in New London, Connecticutmap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 81 in Groton, New London County, Connecticut Colonymap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: White White private message [send private message] and John McCullough private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 13 Sep 2010
This page has been accessed 581 times.

Biography

Birth: 06 FEB 1667 New London, New London County, Connecticut[1]. He was a son of Mary (Vine) Morgan (abt.1641-1689) and James Morgan II (1644-1711).

First Marriage: BEF 1693, Groton, New London County, Connecticut, to "Hannah", or Susannah [2]. Note: The maiden surname of the first wife of this James Morgan probably was Rogers. His online grave memorial represents that it was Rogers (not Avery, as has been presumed in her profile, which came about via an improper merge). Investigation should be applied to verify her true identity.

Their children:

  1. James Morgan IV (1693-1770)
  2. Daniel Morgan (1695-)
  3. Mary (Morgan) Gallup (1697-)
  4. Anna (Morgan) Owen (1705-1743)

Second marriage, 24 Jun 1729 in New London County, Connecticut, to Ann (Shapley)(Avery) Ross, widow of Jonathan Ross.

Death: 04 MAY 1748 at Groton, New London County, Connecticut. His grave is in Avery-Morgan Burial Ground, Groton, New London County, Connecticut, USA [3].

Will: 29 MAR 1747 Groton, New London County, Connecticut

Sources

  1. Morgan: Page 110
  2. Morgan: Page 28
  3. Find A Grave: Memorial #62807676




Is James your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with James by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with James:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 2

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Morgan-230 and Morgan-216 appear to represent the same person because: Both represent the same person.
posted by John French Ph.D.
Morgan-230 and Morgan-13516 appear to represent the same person because: These appear to be the same person.
posted on Morgan-230 (merged) by Tina Truscott

M  >  Morgan  >  James Morgan III