no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Isabel (Moses) Tripp (abt. 1585 - abt. 1654)

Isabel Tripp formerly Moses
Born about in Horkstow, Lincolnshire, Englandmap
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married 30 Jul 1609 in Horkstow, Lincolnshire, Englandmap
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 69 in Horkstow, Lincolnshire, Englandmap
Profile last modified | Created 25 Mar 2011
This page has been accessed 3,488 times.

THIS PROFILE IS BEING UPDATED ACCORDING TO MODERN RESEARCH AS PUBLISHED IN THE GENEALOGIST BY NEIL D. THOMPSON. [1] Joe Cochoit

Contents

Biography

Name

Name: Isabel Moses
Daughter of Nicholas Moses
Orthographic variations: Isabel, Esabel.
Orthographic variations: Moses, Moyses (Moyses was a common spelling Horkstow parish records and many websites may reflect this.)

Birth

Baptized: 20 March 1584/5 in Horkstow, Lincolnshire, England. [1]
Daughter of Nicholas Mo(y)ses.

Marriage and Children

Married: Isabel Moses on 30 July 1609 in Horkstow, Lincolnshire, England. [1]
Children of John Tripp and Isabel Moses:
All baptized at Horkstow: [1]
  • John Tripp. Bapt. 8 September 1611. Immigrant to New England. Died October 28, 1678 in Portsmouth, Rhode Island.
  • Robert Tripp. (twin) Bapt. 27 January 1613/4. Buried 10 February 1613/4.
  • Grace Tripp. (twin) Bapt. 27 January 1613/4. Buried 7 February 1613/4.
  • Francis Tripp. Bapt. 10 February 1614/5.
  • Elizabeth Tripp. Bapt. 15 December 1615. Buried 19 July 1648.
  • Dorothy Tripp. Bapt. 20 March 1618/9. Buried 19 August 1624.
  • Ann Tripp. Bapt. 7 July 1621. Buried 22 February 1626/7
  • Robert Tripp. Bapt. 8 May 1625.
  • Bridget Tripp. Bapt. 20 September 1629. Buried 14 February 1629/30.

Death

Burial: 4 November 1654 in Horkstow, Lincolnshire, England. [1]

Common Errors to Avoid

  • Second husband: She is sometimes found on the internet as also marrying John Crossman. This is incorrect. She was married to John Tripp as Isabel Moses and buried as Isabel Tripp.


Sources

Citations and footnotes:
  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 The Genealogist, vol. 10 no 2. (Fall 1989):195-199. Some Observations on the Ancestry of John Tripp, Emigrant to Portsmouth, Rhode Island, by Neil D. Thompson.
Source list:
  • The Genealogist, vol. 10 no 2. (Fall 1989):195-199. Some Observations on the Ancestry of John Tripp, Emigrant to Portsmouth, Rhode Island, by Neil D. Thompson.
Acknowledgements (contributors):
Joe Cochoit Constance Dickey Doug Minear Bob Nichol




Is Isabel your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Isabel's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 12

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Moyses-8 and Moses-104 appear to represent the same person because: Same wife of John Tripp. Moses preferred.
posted by Joe Cochoit
Moses-125 and Moses-104 appear to represent the same person because: Same wife of John Tripp. She did not marry a Crossman.
posted by Joe Cochoit
Moses-803 and Moses-104 appear to represent the same person because: Same wife of John Tripp.
posted by Joe Cochoit
Lloyd, if you are referring to Isabel Moses-125 in your ancestry, it has been addressed as Isabel Moses-125 is a rejected match of this Isabel Moses - they are clearly not the same person. In fact it is probable that your Isabel Moses never existed at all with that name.
posted by Joe Cochoit
No update, still two separate entries. One year has passed and is any member working on it?
posted by Lloyd Crossman
Moses-104 and Moses-1449 appear to represent the same person because: These appear to have the same spouse, and are a likely match.
posted by Bob Nichol
Moses-150 and Moses-104 appear to represent the same person because: I have updated both profiles according to the modern research article on the family. Ancestry corrected, spouses corrected , dates corrected etc. They are now ready to be merged.
posted by Joe Cochoit
Bob, you are right that there are many discrepancies and errors and errors on these profiles. However, the family has been fully researched and published. Most importantly his English ancestry is wrong. I had begun to clean it up, but haven't finished. What needs to be done at this point is to allow these merges to go through so the clean up work can continue.
posted by Joe Cochoit
Moses-150 and Moses-104 are not ready to be merged because: Discrepancies abound in comparing these families, and sources are totally lacking in one profile. Hopefully, further study will reveal the accurate profile in time.
posted by Bob Nichol
Moses-150 and Moses-104 appear to represent the same person because: same name and family
posted by Patricia Roche
Moses-509 and Moses-104 appear to represent the same person because: These must be the same person. Let's use your DPOB unless/until someone proves differently.
posted by Bob Nichol
Moses-150 and Moses-516 appear to represent the same person because: same husband
posted by Bob Nichol

Rejected matches › Isabel Tripp

M  >  Moses  |  T  >  Tripp  >  Isabel (Moses) Tripp