no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Richbell Mott (abt. 1660)

Richbell Mott
Born about [location unknown]
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
[spouse(s) unknown]
[children unknown]
Died [date unknown] [location unknown]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Corey Dawkins private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 19 Sep 2010
This page has been accessed 323 times.
This profile lacks source information. Please add sources that support the facts.

Biography

Research Notes

Richbel is not the daughter of Adam II Mott and Mary Lott[1]

Sources

  1. ↑ Rhode Island: Vital Records, 1636-1850. (Online database: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2014), Originally Published as: Vital record of Rhode Island 1636-1850: First Series: births, marriages and deaths: a family register for the people, by James N. Arnold. Providence, RI: Narragansett Historical Publishing Company. https://www.americanancestors.org/DB532/i/14491/68/264548678




Is Richbell your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Richbell's ancestors' DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 4

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Catambay-1 Bill Catambay
@Kathy, where is the source showing the parents for this Richbell Mott? I only see Ancestry references, and even they don't show the relationship.
posted by Bill Catambay
Kathy (Brown) Lamm
Mott-1563 and Mott-151 do not represent the same person because: Mott-1563 and Mott-151 have different parents
posted by Kathy (Brown) Lamm
Catambay-1 Bill Catambay
Mott-1563 and Mott-151 appear to represent the same person because: Richbell Mott (151) was incorrectly put in the Rhode Island family, but should be in the New York family. Mott-1563 is a duplicate already in the New York family, so whoever completes this merge, please be sure that Richbell lands in the New York family.
posted by Bill Catambay
Mix-216 Steven Mix
This Richbell Mott (151) was imported as son of the Rhode Island Adam Mott II and Mary Lott. However, I wonder if he really belongs to this Rhode Island family. He may instead be the son of the New York Adam Mott, who married Elizabeth Redman Richbell.

http://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Mott-167

The name may be a coincidence, but it is worth research to try to determine first if this Richbell actually lived in Rhode Island, or if he can be found in New York, and thus probably belong to that New York Adam Mott line instead.

posted by Steven Mix

Rejected matches › Richbell Mott (abt.1668-abt.1734)

M  >  Mott  >  Richbell Mott

Categories: Unsourced Profiles