no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Sarah (Osborn) Law (1673 - 1727)

Sarah Law formerly Osborn aka Burr, Sturges
Born in Eastchester, Westchester, New York Colonymap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 31 Jul 1692 in Fairfield, Fairfield, Connecticutmap
Wife of — married about 1712 [location unknown]
Wife of — married 1 Jun 1726 in Milford, New Haven, Connecticutmap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 54 in Milford, New Haven, Connecticutmap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Katharine Ortloff private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 31 Jul 2011
This page has been accessed 659 times.

Contents

Biography

Sarah was born to David and Abigail Pinckney Osborn in Eastchester about 1673.[1]

Marriages

Sarah Osborn married on 31 July 1692, Jonathan Sturges, as his second wife. Jonathan died in Fairfield 29 Nov 1711.[2]

Sarah then married Judge Peter Burr, about 1712, in Fairfield. Peter died 25 Dec 1724. [2]

Sarah then married, on 1 June 1726 in Milford, her third and last husband, Jonathan Law, who served as Governor of Connecticut from 1742 to 1750.[2]

Children

Sarah and Jonathan Sturges had, in Fairfield:[2]

  • David, b. 7 Jan 1695, bp. 13 Sep 1702, d. 1721
  • Sarah, b. 22 Dec 1700-1, bp. 13 Sep 1702, m. 1719 Andrew Burr
  • Abigail, b. 8 Sep 1704, bp. 10 Sep 1704, m. 1725 Thaddeus Burr
  • Eunice, b. 3 June 1709, bp. 5 June 1709, m. 1731 James Dennie

Death

Sarah died at Milford on 17 June 1727. [2]

Sources

  1. Tompkins, David A., Eastchester Village, colonial New York 1666-1698: Maps and Inhabitants, (Eastchester Historical Society, 1997, on file at the Society), pp. 31-34
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Jacobus, Donald Lines. History and Genealogy of the Families of Old Fairfield (Genealogical Publishing Company, 1930) Vol. 1, pages 125, 456, 593




Is Sarah your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Sarah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Sarah:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 2

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Unknown-306639 and Osborn-444 do not represent the same person because: Unknown-36639's first husband died in 1711. Peter Burr's children born before that time were from a different mother, that is, Osborn-444.
posted by [Living Winter]
Unknown-306639 and Osborn-444 appear to represent the same person because: Same husband
posted by Rick Pierpont

Rejected matches › Abigail (Unknown) Burr (1668-1710)

O  >  Osborn  |  L  >  Law  >  Sarah (Osborn) Law