Born in Ashford, Kent, England
Daughter of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of
John Black Sr
— married
8 Jul 1618 in Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
Descendants 
Died
at age 47
in Belfast, County Down, Ireland
Profile last modified
| Created 7 Aug 2013
This page has been accessed 788 times.
This profile lacks source information. Please add sources that support the facts.
Contents |
Biography
Janet (Osborne) Black was born in England.
Janet was born on the 12 Aug 1594 in Ashford, Kent County, England. Her Christening occurred on 31 DEC 1594 in Buxhall, Suffolk, England. She died in Ireland in 1641.
Research Notes
- Original death location data - Belfast, Ulster Province, Ireland please note term not used in this time period amended to assist in sourcing profile
- Brown-13495 14:40, 3 July 2018 (UTC) No baptism found Ancestry.co,uk, FreeReg, FamilySearch, FindMyPast
- No marriage found on FamilySearch, ScotlandsPeople
Sources
- Source: S-1761195704 Repository: #R-1789194159 Title: Ancestry Family Trees Publication: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com. Original data: Family Tree files submitted by Ancestry members. Note: This information comes from 1 or more individual Ancestry Family Tree files. This source citation points you to a current version of those files. Note: The owners of these tree files may have removed or changed information since this source citation was created.
- Repository: R-1789194159 Name: Ancestry.com Address: http://www.Ancestry.com Note:
- Source: S-2132910164 Repository: #R-2144324172 Title: Ancestry Family Trees Publication: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com. Original data: Family Tree files submitted by Ancestry members. Note: This information comes from 1 or more individual Ancestry Family Tree files. This source citation points you to a current version of those files. Note: The owners of these tree files may have removed or changed information since this source citation was created. Page: Ancestry Family Trees Note: Data: Text: http://trees.ancestry.com/pt/AMTCitationRedir.aspx?tid=9773793&pid=1172
- Repository: R-2144324172 Name: Ancestry.com Address: http://www.Ancestry.com Note:
Acknowledgments
- Thank you to David Black for creating WikiTree profile Osborne-1893 through the import of David_s Family Tree_Ancestry_26Jun2013.ged on Jul 23, 2013.
- Thank you to Walter Fiedler for creating WikiTree profile Osbourne-115 through the import of Fiedler Family Tree.ged on Jun 20, 2013.
Is Janet your ancestor? Please don't go away!
Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or
ask our community of genealogists a question.
Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA
No known carriers of Janet's DNA have taken a DNA test.
No known carriers of Janet's DNA have taken a DNA test.
Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
Featured National Park champion connections: Janet is 15 degrees from Theodore Roosevelt, 22 degrees from Stephanus Johannes Paulus Kruger, 14 degrees from George Catlin, 18 degrees from Marjory Douglas, 22 degrees from Sueko Embrey, 16 degrees from George Grinnell, 24 degrees from Anton Kröller, 16 degrees from Stephen Mather, 24 degrees from Kara McKean, 19 degrees from John Muir, 15 degrees from Victoria Hanover and 21 degrees from Charles Young on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.
O > Osborne | B > Black > Janet (Osborne) Black
Categories: Unsourced Profiles | Kent, Unsourced Profiles | Ashford, Kent
Most names from this period are spelled differently from time to time even by the subject.
This person Osbourne-115 and Osborne-1893 are the same person and should be merged under both spellings. At this time, a merge is unable to be done. If Mr. Feidler can provide documentation his suggested spelling is correct, then the merge can be made. I cannot disprove either spelling, Osbourne, or Osborne.
This person Osbourne-115 and Osborne-1893 are the same person and should be merged under both spellings. At this time, a merge is unable to be done. If Mr. Feidler can provide documentation his suggested spelling is correct, then the merge can be made. I cannot disprove either spelling, Osbourne, or Osborne.