no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Martha (Griegg) Edwards (abt. 1652 - aft. 1716)

Martha Edwards formerly Griegg aka Branch, Osborne
Born about in Henrico County, Virginiamap [uncertain]
Daughter of and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married 1671 in Henrico, Virginiamap
Wife of — married 1688 in Henrico, Virginiamap
Wife of — married 26 Oct 1692 in Henrico, Virginia Colonymap
Descendants descendants
Died after after about age 64 in Henrico County, Virginiamap [uncertain]
Profile last modified | Created 19 Oct 2010
This page has been accessed 1,826 times.

Contents

Biography

U.S. Southern Colonies Project logo
Martha (Griegg) Edwards was a Virginia colonist.

She was born about 1652.

Martha Griegg first married about 1671 in Virginia to John Branch (1652-1688).

She was Martha Branch in April of 1688 when she was granted probate for the Will of her deceased husband, John Branch. [1]

Martha married about 1688 to Thomas Osborne, III (Thomas was first married to Mary Bailey 1644-1665). [2]

She was Martha Osborne when she testified in court on 01 Dec 1688 for Abel Gower, at which time the clerk re­corded that she was about age 26 [3]

Thomas Osborne died in 1692 and Martha was married for the final time to Thomas Edwards on 26 October 1692 [4] [5] [6]

Research Notes

Different Marthas and Thomas Edwards may have been confused. See Martha (Osborn) Edwards for a discussion of various possibilities.


Martha Osborn married on 26 Oct 1692 in Henrico County, Virginia to Thomas Edwards. [7]

She died after 1716. [8]

Extract

Thomas Lockett, died c1745/46 [#4 John Camden Hotten: Original Lists of Persons of Quality, etc. p219 Rouse "Reeds and Their Relatives" p485]

Thomas Lockett married 1) Martha Osborne; 2) Elizabeth.

Martha Osborne was the niece of Margaret (Osborne) Lockett [the daughter of her brother Thomas Osborne, Jr. (1641-1692)] and was born c1662. (Henrico Records p26; Martha Osborne, aged 26 years on 01 Dec 1688).

Martha Osborne would be the niece of Margaret Osborne Lockett, and first cousin of her husband Thomas Lockett, 2nd.

Until recently it was usually thought that the second wife of Thomas Osborne (1641-1692), who was the widow of John Branch, was Martha Jones. She married Thomas Edwards not long after Thomas Osborne’s death, the license being issued 20 Oct 1692. [#26 Henrico Records V 1688-1697 p435]

On 01 August 1693, the Court ordered Mr. Thomas Edwards, who married the relict of Mr. Osborne Sr., (who married the relict of Mr. John Branch, deceased) to appear at the next Court. This order is recorded in the Orphans Court, so it evidently had to do with the minor children of Branch and Osborne.

On 01 June 1695, Mr. Richard Kennon was discharged from being security for Mr. Thomas Edwards, guardian of orphans of John Branch and Thomas Osborne, and Capt. William Randolph became surety. [#27 Henrico Records V 1688-1697 p435]

Mr. James Branch Cabell has recently advanced the idea that Martha Branch-Osborne-Edwards was born Griegg, the daughter of Robert Griegg, whose Will, dated 10 February 1702-03, recorded in Henrico, 02 August 1703, mentions the testator’s grandchildren: John Cocke, Thomas Edwards Jr., Mary Ward, and Edward Branch. The witnesses are Edward Warding, John Clark, and Jane Gower, who is named Executrix. Jane Gower was the mother of John Branch who was Martha Griegg’s first husband, having successively married William Baugh, Jr., William Branch and Abel Gower. (See Mr. Cabell’s report which follows at the end of this chapter).

But from the wills of Repps Jones and his mother, Mrs. Mary Skerme, it is evident that Martha Jones, daughter of Mrs. Mary Skerme by her first husband Thomas Jones, married an Osborne, and that she left children Mary, Martha and Thomas Osborne. Reps Jones’ Will was made 19 February 1688/89 and was probated 01 August 1689; he bequeathed property to Philip Turpin, who married his sister Elizabeth, (this was the property he bought from his brother Thomas Jones, which at the death of Philip and Elizabeth Turpin was to go to his cozen (sic) Thomas Jones, and if Thomas Jones left no male heirs, it was to go to Edward Skerme); his sisters Mary Skerme and Martha Osborne; and his honored mother. [#28 Henrico Records V 1688-1697 p73]

Mrs. Mary Jones married Edward Skerme, who died about 1677, and his widow was given the probate of his estate 01 September 1677. [#29 Henrico Records v1 p16]

Mrs. Mary Skerme died about 1710 and left property to her grandchildren, Matthew, Philip, and Martha Turpin; daughter Elizabeth Turpin; son-in-law Philip Turpin; grand daughter Elizabeth Turpin; daughter Mary Brodneks (Broadnax); and to grandchildren Mary, Martha, and Thomas Osborne. She left Martha Osborne her wedding ring. (The Will was dated 16 November 1707 and proved 05 October 1710.) [#30 Henrico Records 1710-1714 Will, dated: 16 Nov 1707; proved: 05 Oct 1710]

It was this Martha Osborne who according to family tradition married Thomas Lockett, 2nd.

The above facts suggest that Thomas Osborne’s (1641-1692) first wife was Martha Jones; that she died not too long after her brother Repps made his Will (19 Feb 1688-89) and that Thomas Osborne then married Martha, widow of John Branch, not long thereafter. Since Thomas Osborne, son of Thomas (1641-1692), was filing a petition with the Court concerning his father’s estate in 1692, it is likely that he was already of age, suggesting a birth date about 1670 at the latest.

On 20 August 1692, Mr. Thomas Osborne, son and heir of Mr. Thomas Osborne, deceased, petitioned the Court that the widow of said decedent may have her parts of lands and plantacions (sic) of ye said decedent assigned and laid out by such persons as appointed by the Court. The Court ordered that the said Thomas and Mrs. Martha Osborne, relict and Executrix of the decedent try to agree before the next Court and if they do not, the Court will appoint persons to make the division. [#31 Henrico Records v1 p489]

Since Mrs. Skerme names Thomas Osborne a grandson, it seems likely that his mother was a daughter of Mrs. Skerme. Mrs. Skerme’s first husband was Thomas Jones, a son of Thomas and Margaret Jones who came to Virginia in the "London Merchant" in March 1619/20. [#32 Cabell: Branchiana p140-142]

As Repps Jones, son of Thomas and Mary Jones, lists Martha Osborne as a sister, it seems likely that Martha Jones was the first wife of Thomas Osborne (1641-1692). Actually such an explanation clears up the problem of how a man apparently of age in 1692 and 1696 (when he was giving deeds), could have been the grandson of a woman (Mrs. Skerme) whose daughter did not marry his father until after 1688, which would have been the case if Martha Branch-Osborne-Edwards had been born Martha Jones.

However, there is one problem which yet remains. Martha Osborne appeared as a witness in Henrico Court, 01 December 1688, and gave the same testimony as Mrs. Jane Gower, to the effect that when two men came before Abel Gower, (a Justice of the Court), with a dispute over apples, Mr. Gower, being very ill, asked them to go before some other Justice. Martha Osborne is here listed as about 26 years of age. [#33 Henrico Records v5 p28]

It is not likely that this would have been the first Mrs. Thomas Osborne, from the age. The age and the circumstance both fit the second Mrs. Osbarne, for her first husband John Branch, was a son of Mrs. Gower by a previous marriage. But it is between two or three months later that Repps Jones makes a will mentioning his sister Martha Osborne. If Thomas Osborne, son of Thomas (1641-1692) had been born about 1670, it would be impossible for his mother to have been only 26 years old in 1688. Yet Mrs. Mary Skerme lists him as a grandson, which indicates that he, Mary and Martha Osborne were the children of Martha Jones Osborne. And it does not seem likely that Repps Jones would have referred in his Will to a deceased sister as though she were still alive.

Thomas Osborne’s Will mentions a son John, a son Thomas, and his wife, Martha, who is named Executrix. John got 200 acres of Coxendale and 95 acres, “lately patented”; Thomas was to occupy, possess, and enjoy the part on which he dwells during the natural life of wife Martha and no longer; Martha got the house where I live and the orchard; the rest of the goods was to be divided between John and Martha. If John died before he became 18, Martha was to have the choice of the three parts into which these are to be divided, with the rest going to Thomas or the male heirs of Thomas. Dated 02 Oct 1691; proved 01 June 1692. [#34 Henrico Records v5 p310]

There is the indication that John Osborne was the son of Martha, the second wife, since she was mentioned as his guardian in another record. A page in the records is mutilated, but we can learn that the "said Thomas in Court refusing”. The Court directed the Sheriff to summon - Ligon, Surveyor, and an able jury of the neighborhood on the 13th instant to divide the Osborne property, except what belongs to John Osborne (second son of the decedent) under the guardianship of the said Martha. The late dwelling and orchard of the decedent were given to Martha in lieu of her claiming no part of the whole plantation whereon said Thomas lives and is also excluded from the division. The mutilation does not give the date, but the page number suggets that this settlement was determined not long after Thomas Osborne filed the petition in August 1692. [#35 Henrico Records v1 p494]

From all of the above records we may conclude that Martha Osborne who according to family tradition married Thomas Lockett, 2nd, had not married in 1707 when her grandmother’s Will was written, as she refers to her as MARTHA OSBORNE. She was dead prior to 1722. [#36 Stanard’s Extracts p3 with note #16]

The evidence that her father was born about 1641 comes from testimony he offered in Henrico County, 02 Dec 1689, when his age was given as about 48 years. [#37 Henrico Records V 1688-1697 p107]

Dr. James Branch Cabell, who has done much research on the Osborne family, incident to his research on the Branch family with whom the Osbornes were closely connected, arrives at a different conclusion concerning the maiden name of the widow of John Branch, whom he says was Martha Griegg. He very kindly prepared a short report for me in August of 1950 and it follows below ...

"Edward Osborne, Gent., on 02 June 1636, patented 400 acres in Henrico, "Joyning - westerly upon the Maine river", (and therefore apparently not in what is now Chesterfield), due for his personal adventure and the transportation of seven persons, two of whom were Robert James and Richard Hitchcock.
Captain Thomas Osborne of Coxendale, born 1590, came to Virginia in 1619, leaving in England at least one son, and dies prior to 1642.
This son, Thomas Osborne, Jun’r, on 16 June 1637, patented 500 acres in Henrico, adjoining southerly upon his father’s land, “Ffeering”, due for his personal adventure and the transportation of nine persons. This shows that he came from England and presumably was unmarried in 1637, since otherwise his wife would be listed among the headrights, Upon 20 August 1642, after his father’s death, as Thomas Osborne he patented 400 acres in Henrico, adjoining North North East on Mr. Osborne’s land called by the name of "Ffeering". He died before 1685, leaving issue ...
Thomas Osborne of Coxendale, born 1641, died March 1692, Will dated 01 October 1691, recorded 01 June 1692. On 20 April 1685, he patented eighty five acres in Henrico, "along the head of the said Osborne’s ancient patent, belonging to Coxendale". This shows that his father was then dead. The name of his first wife is not known. He married in 1688/89, Martha Griegg, then the widow of John Branch, and she married, third, in 1692, Thomas Edwards.
Thomas Osborne of Coxendale, in his Will refers to the 1685 patent as "the land I lately patented". Immediately before his death, he applied for the patent granted 19 (or 29) April 1692, upon account of the resurvey having shown the estimated 1000 acres to be 1113 acres, the surplus being covered by his importation of two persons. In terming "Captain Thomas Osborne, father of the Patentee", this land grant is beyond question incorrect, and should read "grandfather:. By his first wife, Thomas Osborne of Coxendale had issue another Thomas, and he left also another son, John, who was under eighteen in 1691, and who may have been a child of second wife.
The son Thomas Osborne of Henrico, born prior to 1670, died 1733, Will dated 27 February 1730, recorded June 1733, sold to his uncle Edward Osborne, upon 01 June 1696, two hundred acres of land "granted to my great grandfather, Captain Thomas Osborne, by patent". He sold to Philip Turpin, on 02 August 1697, one hundred acres of land "more or less", which from the description of it appears to be the eighty five acres patented by his father on 20 April 1685.
He married, prior to February 1688-89, Martha Jones, born 1662, who died prior to 1730, (since her husband’s Will does not mention her, and bequeaths to his daughter Cicely, "All her mother’s clothes"), and by her had issue ...
- Thomas Osborne; Martha Osborne, living in 1707, who died prior to 1730, since her father’s Will does not mention her;
- Mary Osborne, who married Benjamin Branch;
- Elizabeth Osborne, who died unmarried prior to 1730;
- Edward Osborne; and
- Cicely Osborne.
The younger son of Thomas Osborne, Jun’r, was Edward Osborne of Henrico, born 1646, living 01 June 1696 (when he already possessed a portion of the Coxendale property, and bought from his nephew two hundred more acres of it "running along Edward Osborne’s line"), Will dated 06 January 1696, recorded 01 April 1697, who married Tabitha Platt, and left issue.
As to Martha Branch-Osborne-Edwards; The Will of Robert Griegg, dated 10 February 1702/03, recorded in Henrico 02 August 1703, mentions the testator’s grandchildren, John Cocke, Thomas Edwards Jr., Mary Ward and Edward Branch. The witnesses are Edward Warding, John Clark, and Jane Gower, who is named Executrix. She was the mother of that John Branch who was Martha Griegg’s first husband, having married successively William Baugh Jr., William Branch, and Abel Gower."

The above report gives us food for thought, and certainly clues for further research. However, until, or I might say UNLESS other records are discovered, we can not say with any certainty how many generations of Osbornes lived in Henrico County in the seventeenth century.

Since there are no OFFICIAL records of the marriages of Margaret Osborne to Thomas Lockett, first, and Martha Osborne to Thomas Lockett, Second, we shall have to accept the family traditions that have been handed down through many generations.

It is my earnest hope that some future genius will untangle the many clues and solve the problems. Until then, perhaps the descendants will study my effort with understanding and forbearance. [9]

Research Notes

Goode Cemetery includes a number of Branch burials and ...

- Martha (Griegg) Edwards (1640-unknown)
- Martha (Goode) Branch Taylor Osborne Edwards (1662-1729)
- Martha (Jones) Goode (1667- unknown)
- Thomas Edwards (unknown-1688)
- Thomas Edwards (1656-unknown)
- Cpt. Thomas Edwards (1700-1782)
- Cpt. Thomas Osborne (1641-1691)
- John Osborne (1689-29 Mar 1760)
- Cpt. Abel Gower (unknown-Dec 1688)
- Jane Hatcher Gower (1640-1709)
- Edward Skerme (1670-1699).

Sources

  1. Henrico County book 1678-1693 p266
  2. "Story of History of Sites and People of Chesterfield County, Virginia, by Mrs. Maude Adkins Joyner in 1950
  3. Henrico County book 1688-1697 p26
  4. Henrico County, Virginia probate records at familysearch.org, "County Court records, deeds, wills, settlements of estates, etc., 1677-1787", 1677-1697, film # 31763, page 435, image 482/650
  5. https://www.familysearch.org/library/books/records/item/175598-the-osborn-oracle-v-1-no-2-june-1970?viewer=1&offset=0#page=11&viewer=picture&o=info&n=0&q=
  6. Virginia, U.S., Compiled Marriages 1660-1800 compiled by Jordan Dodd on ancestry.com; m: 26 Oct 1692 Henrico County, Virginia for Thomas Edwards & Martha Osborne
  7. Virginia, Marriages 1660-1800 compiled by Jordan Dodd; on ancestry.com
  8. Henrico County, VIrginia Will Book
  9. "Southern kith and kin; a record of my children's ancestors" by Jewel Davis Scarborough of Abilene Texas in 1951; p219-225






Is Martha your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Martha by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Martha:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 17

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Griegg-1 and Osborn-3167 appear to represent the same person because: Reverse this merge. Osborn-3167 into Griegg-1. With the addition of more primary sources, court records, the merge should continue. However, supported by the previously mentioned court records this Martha was born in 1662 not 1652. So the marriage date to John Branch did nor occur in 1671, it occurred around 1680. So this marriage record is in error.
posted on Osborn-3167 (merged) by Victor Lee
Victor, I have restored the old bio before my edit and added your comments here ...

Victor Lee commented ...

There are problems with Martha (Griegg) Branch Osborn Edwards being the same as this woman, first are sons William (b. 1694) and Thomas (b. 1697) Edwards. If Thomas Edwards was married to Martha Griegg, (info listed below) Martha would have been in her mid to late 40s when son Thomas Edwards was born. It is possible the 1697 birth year is too early. Projecting son Thomas's birth date from his marriage in 1724 would result in a birth year of 1704. Putting Martha Griegg giving birth in her 50s, Big red flag. Given the age Martha Griegg would be at the births of sons William and Thomas, I would look at the Osborn family to see if there is another Martha who would be the right age for the mother of William and Thomas Edwards. Second, If Thomas Edwards was as old as Martha (Griegg) Branch Osborn Edwards, there is no record of a prior family for husband Thomas Edwards.
Given the info at hand, it is more probable that Thomas Edwards was a young man and he died young. And thus his wife was a younger woman than Martha (Griegg) Branch Osborn Edwards.
posted on Osborn-3167 (merged) by N Gauthier
Another possibility is that there are 2 different men named "Thomas Edwards" - the one that married Martha (Griegg) Branch-Osborne and another one that married a Martha of unknown maiden surname.
posted on Osborn-3167 (merged) by N Gauthier
Could there be a confusion of profile details, because both Thomas Edwards, Sr. married a Martha and Thomas Edwards, Jr. also married a different Martha ?
posted on Osborn-3167 (merged) by N Gauthier
Hi Victor, Please review the book extract of one researcher's findings about different women named Martha Osborne, to see if it helps you come to any conclusions about her.
posted on Osborn-3167 (merged) by N Gauthier
If I understood correctly, the first section mentioned two Martha's whos maiden name was Osborn. Plus we add who we are assuming is Martha (Grigg) Branch Osborn Edwards. So we have three women who are recorded as Osborn in Primary Source records.

I will start with the comment below

[As to Martha Branch-Osborne-Edwards; The Will of Robert Griegg, dated 10 February 1702/03, recorded in Henrico 02 August 1703, mentions the testator’s grandchildren, John Cocke, Thomas Edwards Jr., Mary Ward and Edward Branch. The witnesses are Edward Warding, John Clark, and Jane Gower, who is named Executrix. She was the mother of that John Branch who was Martha Griegg’s first husband, having married successively William Baugh Jr., William Branch, and Abel Gower."]

A Will cannot be relied upon to mention all children, much less all grand children. Which of these grandchildren are the child or children of daughter Martha and which are the children of other daughters? Lets assume for now grandchildren Branch and Edwards are Martha's children. If so, Edward Branch can be confirmed as the child of daughter Martha. The mother of any other Branch children, linked to Martha, would have to be proven another way. Or they are not Martha's children.

Couple the comment above with the comment below. The Branch and Osborn children are minors in 1795 and need a guardian. And the guardian needs a security for these minor children. Are step-children of Martha involved? No Osborn children are mentioned and no additional Branch or Edwards children.

[On 01 August 1693, the Court ordered Mr. Thomas Edwards, who married the relict of Mr. Osborne Sr., (who married the relict of Mr. John Branch, deceased) to appear at the next Court. This order is recorded in the Orphans Court, so it evidently had to do with the minor children of Branch and Osborne.

On 01 June 1695, Mr. Richard Kennon was discharged from being security for Mr. Thomas Edwards, guardian of orphans of John Branch and Thomas Osborne, and Capt. William Randolph became surety. [#27 Henrico Records V 1688-1697 p435]]

From the Edwards side, this info proves a Thomas Edwards Sr. and Jr. And places Thomas Edwards Jr.'s birth year range 1693-1703. This matches the info at hand for Thomas Edwards Jr. Assuming Martha was age 26 in 1688, giving birth in age range of 31-41 is possible. I must have read another comment which Martha was age 26 at an earlier date. So need to verify the original court record for the year Martha Osborn states she is age 26.

With the addition of the court records, the Martha who married Thomas Edwards Sr. was the mother/step mother of children of John Branch and Thomas Osborn. And a daughter of Robert Griegg had a grandchild named Thomas Edwards Jr.. Although Thomas Edwards Sr.'s son William is not mentioned in Robert Griegg's Will, I think there are enough pointers to merge my Martha Osborn as Martha (Griegg) Branch Osborn Edwards, and make her the mother of Thomas Edwards Jr.. Thomas Edwards Sr. might have been married before.

posted on Osborn-3167 (merged) by Victor Lee
Found why I thought Martha Griegg was born before 1662, Someone recorded the marriage to John Branch as occurring in 1671, this is not possible. Martha Griegg would have been 9 years old at the time. So Martha's marriage to John Branch occurred around 1680.
posted on Osborn-3167 (merged) by Victor Lee
Osborn-3167 and Griegg-1 appear to represent the same person because: dups with same husbands. She was born a Grieg and married 3 times.

Osborn was her 2nd of 3 husbands. See Grieg profile for sources.

posted by N Gauthier
I think we can agree that Thomas Edwards did not marry two separate and distinct women on October 26, 1692 in Henrico Co. The marriage record indicates that the one woman that he married was a widow who had been married to a man named Thomas Osborne. She is styled "Mrs. Thomas Osborne".


Lycences for mariage -- Oct'r 26: 1692 Mr. Tho's Edwards & Mrs Martha Osborne Securitys named Edw'd Hatcher Tho: Holmes ("Henrico County, Virginia Deeds, Wills, Etc. 1688-1697" (LDS microfilm 31763, item 3), page 435)


So which Thomas Osborne? The October 2, 1691 will of Thomas Osborne III refers to his wife Martha. She was the executrix of his estate and on September 1, 1692 she presented an inventory to the court. The wedding that we are talking about took place less than 2 months later. In the absence of contrary evidence it seems obvious that Thomas Edwards's new wife was the widow of Thomas Osborne III.

Osborn-3167 is woman whose maiden name (last name at birth) was Osborn. Thomas Edward did not marry such a woman. Osborn-3167 never existed, and the profile should be removed. Merging it with Griegg-1 is a way to do that.

Note that whether the wife of Thomas Osborne III was Martha Grieg(g) previously married to John Branch, or someone else is another matter about which there has been disagreement.

No evidence has been provided as to the birth dates of Thomas and William Edwards. The dates in WikiTree (1694 and 1697) are plausible. 1693 and 1695 would also be plausible.

We don't have any unambiguous evidence as to the age of the widow Mrs. Martha Osborne. A Martha Osborne gave a deposition on December 1, 1688 in which it was said that she was about 26 years of age, thus born in about 1662. If the deponent in 1688 was then the wife of Thomas Osborne III (and later the wife of Thomas Edwards), then she was easily young enough to have given birth to Thomas and William Edwards in the early to mid 1690's.

If the deponent was the wife of Thomas Osborne IV, then we don't have any clear evidence as to the age of the widow of Thomas Osborne III. If she was born in 1652, as is proposed in the profile of Martha Edwards formerly Griegg aka Branch (Griegg-1), she would be young enough (just barely) to have 2 sons in the early 1690's. And she could have been born after 1652. The dates in WikiTree about births and marriages related to Griegg-1 are mostly guesses.

posted by Neal Parker
Osborn-3167 and Griegg-1 appear to represent the same person because: Both are wives of Thomas Edwards (Edwards-15522). The woman's maiden name was Griegg. Her second husband was Thomas Osborne. Her third husband was Thomas Edwards.
posted by Neal Parker
If she was 26 in 1688, after Branch had already died and she had already married Osborne, that means she was born about 1662, not 1652.

That means she was too young to be the mother of Patience and Obedience.

posted by Jack Danel
My sister has Martha's maiden name as BOLLING, but I have nothing to substantiate that.
posted on Osborn-3167 (merged) by Judith (Drew) Brittingham
Need the source that says she was a Greigg.
I am Hensley and I have got back this far on my mom's,mom , Dad's,mom.grandmother
posted on Osborn-3167 (merged) by Shirley Ramey
Hi Susan,

As we are a collaborative tree, it would be a great help if you could be a bit more explicit about your sources. For instance: If these are from a family bible or work done by another family member that you inherited or a birth or marriage certificate, giving specifics will help others know where the information comes from. Anything would be helpful.

Here is what our Sources help page says. It has lots of ideas: http://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Sources

Looking forward to your contributions!

Dave

posted on Griegg-4 (merged) by Dave Rutherford
Osborne-1254 and Osborne-216 may share some similarities, but other differences like given name, spouse, and other locations indicate this profile needs additional research and better source citations before any merge is completed.
posted on Osborne-216 (merged) by Michael Tyler
Osborne-1254 and Osborne-216 appear to represent the same person because: birth and death details the same. Her husband's surname seems to be incorrectly captured in one entry.
posted on Osborne-216 (merged) by Evan (Chapman) Snyman

G  >  Griegg  |  E  >  Edwards  >  Martha (Griegg) Edwards

Categories: Virginia Colonists