There are multiple potential baptism records for Janet. She was likely born in Alloa, since her marriage record says she is "of this parish". There are two Alloa records that work well based on the ages of her children:
PATERSON, JANNET; JAMES PATERSON/MARGARET CRUMBIE; 03/08/1705; 465/
20 92; Alloa
and
PATERSON, JANNET; WILLIAM PATERSON/JANNET PATERSON; 06/10/1706; 465/
20 101; Alloa
But, considering how Janet did not name any of her children after any of these potential parents, it is very difficult to say which of the two baptism records is more likely, or whether her baptism was recorded elsewhere or not recorded at all.
Sources
↑ OPR Marriage indexes; HUNTER, JOHN; JANET PATERSON/; 18/12/1730; 465/ 30 391; Alloa; from www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk
↑ "Scotland Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XYKX-GM8 : 10 February 2018), John Hunter in entry for John Hunter, 24 Oct 1731; citing ALLOA,CLACKMANNAN,SCOTLAND, reference , index based upon data collected by the Genealogical Society of Utah, Salt Lake City; FHL microfilm 1,040,205.
↑ "Scotland Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XYKX-2ZH : 10 February 2018), John Hunter in entry for Hunter, 28 Jan 1733; citing ALLOA,CLACKMANNAN,SCOTLAND, reference , index based upon data collected by the Genealogical Society of Utah, Salt Lake City; FHL microfilm 1,040,205.
↑ OPR Baptism indexes; HUNTER, ELIZABETH; JOHN HUNTER/JANET PATERSON; F; 20/11/1737; 465/ 20 346; Alloa; from www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk
↑ OPR Baptism indexes; HUNTER, DAVID; JOHN HUNTER/JANET PATERSON; M; 09/08/1747; 465/ 40 53; Alloa; from www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk
Is Janet your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Janet by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Janet: